The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control of pore structure and size in freeze‐dried collagen sponges
Abstract
Because of many suitable properties, collagen sponges are used as an acellular implant or a biomaterial in the field of tissue engineering. Generally, the inner three‐dimensional structure of the sponges influences the behavior of cells. To investigate this influence, it is necessary to develop a process to produce sponges with a defined, adjustable, and homogeneous pore structure. Collagen sponges can be produced by freeze‐drying of collagen suspensions. The pore structure of the freeze‐dried sponges mirrors the ice‐crystal morphology after freezing. In industrial production, the collagen suspensions are solidified under time‐ and space‐dependent freezing conditions, resulting in an inhomogeneous pore structure. In this investigation, unidirectional solidification was applied during the freezing process to produce collagen sponges with a homogeneous pore structure. Using this technique the entire sample can be solidified under thermally constant freezing conditions. The ice‐crystal morphology and size can be adjusted by varying the solute concentration in the collagen suspension. Collagen sponges with a very uniform and defined pore structure can be produced. Furthermore, the pore size can be adjusted between 20–40 μm. The thickness of the sponges prepared during this research was 10 mm. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 58: 352–357, 2001
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design of an artificial skin. Part III. Control of pore structure
Dagalakis, N., Flink, J., Stasikelis, P., Burke, J. F., & Yannas, I. V. (1980) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820140417 · Cited by 358
Cited by
Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications
Drury, J. L., & Mooney, D. J. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00340-5 · Cited by 5,136
Hydrogels in Biology and Medicine: From Molecular Principles to Bionanotechnology
Peppas, N. A., Hilt, J. Z., Khademhosseini, A., & Langer, R. (2006) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200501612 · Cited by 4,109
Freeze‐Casting of Porous Ceramics: A Review of Current Achievements and Issues
Deville, S. (2008) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.200700270 · Cited by 1,260
Processing of collagen based biomaterials and the resulting materials properties
Meyer, M. (2019) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/s12938-019-0647-0 · Cited by 539
Xia, Z., Yu, X., Jiang, X., Brody, H. D., Rowe, D. W., & Wei, M. (2013) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.038 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoof, H., Apel, J., Heschel, I., & Rau, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 352-357
- ISSN
- 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4636
- OpenAlex
- W2099883555
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control of pore structure and size in freeze‐dried collagen sponges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.1028
- The paper
- Schoof, H., Apel, J., Heschel, I., & Rau, G. (2001). Control of pore structure and size in freeze‐dried collagen sponges. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.