The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice
Open accessAbstract
Chitosan scaffolds appear to be suitable for a variety of tissue engineering applications. This study addressed the biocompatibility of chitosan in a mouse implantation model. Porous chitosan scaffolds were implanted in mice, and animals were sacrificed after 1, 2, 4, 8, or 12 weeks. Macroscopic inspection of the implantation site revealed no pathological inflammatory responses. Histological assessment indicated marked neutrophil accumulation within the implant, which resolved with increasing implantation time. Gram staining and limulus assays revealed no evidence of infection or endotoxin. Collagen was observed within the chitosan pore spaces, indicating that connective tissue matrix was deposited within the implant. Angiogenic activity associated with the external implant surface was also observed. Cellular immune responses were determined by lymphocyte proliferation assays, and antibody responses were measured using ELISA techniques. These assays indicated a very low incidence of chitosan‐specific reactions. Although there was a large migration of neutrophils into the implantation area, there were minimal signs of any inflammatory reaction to the material itself. This preliminary study demonstrates that chitosan has a high degree of biocompatibility in this animal model. Overall, the findings suggest that chitosan may be suitable for the development of implantable materials. © 2001 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 59: 585–590, 2002
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications
Drury, J. L., & Mooney, D. J. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00340-5 · Cited by 5,136
Franz, S., Rammelt, S., Scharnweber, D., & Simon, J. C. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.078 · Cited by 1,391
Hu, Q., Li, B., Wang, M., & Shen, J. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00582-9 · Cited by 466
Kou, S. (., Peters, L., & Mucalo, M. (2022) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119132 · Cited by 380
Wang, Y.-X., Robertson, J. L., Spillman, W. B., & Claus, R. O. (2004) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/b:pham.0000036909.41843.18 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- VandeVord, P. J., Matthew, H. W. T., DeSilva, S. P., Mayton, L., Wu, B., & Wooley, P. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12-05
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 585-590
- ISSN
- 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4636
- OpenAlex
- W2104948210
- Cited by
- 747
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.1270
- The paper
- VandeVord, P. J., Matthew, H. W. T., DeSilva, S. P., Mayton, L., Wu, B., & Wooley, P. H. (2002). Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.