Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 410

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Macrophage/particle interactions: Effect of size, composition and surface area

Shanbhag, Arun S., Jacobs, Joshua J., Black, Jonathan, Galante, Jorge O., Glant, Tibor T.·1994·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Abstract

Particulate wear‐debris are detected in histiocytes/macrophages of granulomatous tissues adjacent to loose joint prostheses. Such cell‐particle interactions have been simulated in vitro by challenging macrophages with particles dosed according to weight percent, volume percent, and number of particles. Each of these dosage methods has inherent shortcomings due to varying size and density of challenging particles of different compositions. In this study we challenged P388D 1 macrophages with titania and polystyrene particles (> 2 μm), with dosage based on the ratio of the surface area of the particles to the surface area of the cells. The effect of size and composition on (1) the bone resorbing activity, (2) fibroblast proliferation, and (3) secretion of IL‐1 and PGE 2 was determined. Macrophage response to particulate debris appears to be dependent on particle size, composition, and dose as given by surface area ratio. P388D 1 macrophages challenged with titania particles released IL‐1, but did not stimulate fibroblasts. Inhibition of macrophage DNA synthesis at higher surface area ratios suggests cell damage or death. Particle‐stimulated cells increased bone resorption up to 125% of controls but released only basal levels of PGE 2. Macrophages stimulated by wear particles are expected to synthesize numerous factors affecting events in the bone‐implant interface. Using the concept of surface area ratio allows us to study and compare such cellular responses to wear particles in a standardized manner. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.820280111

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 410

Metadata

Authors
Shanbhag, A. S., Jacobs, J. J., Black, J., Galante, J. O., & Glant, T. T.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
81-90
ISSN
  • 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4636
OpenAlex
W2007835360
Cited by
410
References
4
FWCI
15.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macrophage/particle interactions: Effect of size, composition and surface area. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.820280111
The paper
Shanbhag, A. S., Jacobs, J. J., Black, J., Galante, J. O., & Glant, T. T. (1994). Macrophage/particle interactions: Effect of size, composition and surface area. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820280111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.