The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anchorage of TiO2‐blasted, HA‐coated, and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the histometrical and biomechanical anchorage of TiO 2‐blasted implants and TiO 2‐blasted implants coated with hydroxyapatite. The control implants were machined. Twenty‐six rabbits had a total of 156 implants placed in the proximal part of the tibia. Each rabbit had a machined, a TiO 2‐blasted, and a TiO 2‐blasted, HA‐coated implant placed in each tibia. After a healing period of 3 and 12 weeks, respectively, the implants placed in the right tibia were used for removal torque test, and the implants placed in the left tibia were used for histomorphometrical measurements. Preoperatively, implants from the same batches were examined topographically with a TopScan 3D system. The TiO 2‐blasted implants demonstrated significantly higher removal torque values than the machined implants, and they also had a significantly more irregular surface. Furthermore, significantly higher bone‐to‐implant contact length fractions were measured adjacent to the TiO 2‐blasted implants in contrast to the machined implants. The advantages of a TiO 2‐blasted surface were more pronounced after 3 weeks than after 12 weeks. The results demonstrated that it was possible to influence the anchorage of implants by altering the surface structure morphology. The new method with TiO 2 blasting on the titanium surface improves the anchorage o fimplants but is not yet practicable for HA coating. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Searle, S. R., Casella, G., & McCulloch, C. E. (1992) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316856 · Cited by 1,926
Cited by
Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration
Le Guéhennec, L., Soueidan, A., Layrolle, P., & Amouriq, Y. (2007) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025 · Cited by 2,406
Bosshardt, D. D., Chappuis, V., & Buser, D. (2017) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12179 · Cited by 574
Implant Surface Roughness and Bone Healing: a Systematic Review
Shalabi, M. M., Gortemaker, A., Hof, M. A. V., Jansen, J. A., & Creugers, N. H. J. (2006) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/154405910608500603 · Cited by 531
A Comparison of Endosseous Dental Implant Surfaces
Cochran, D. L. (1999) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.1999.70.12.1523 · Cited by 329
Schenk, R. K., & Buser, D. (1998) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00120.x · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Gotfredson, K., Wennerberg, A., Johansson, C., Skovgaard, L. T., & Hjørting‐Hansen, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1223-1231
- ISSN
- 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4636
- OpenAlex
- W2060175352
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anchorage of TiO2‐blasted, HA‐coated, and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.820291009
- The paper
- Gotfredson, K., Wennerberg, A., Johansson, C., Skovgaard, L. T., & Hjørting‐Hansen, E. (1995). Anchorage of TiO2‐blasted, HA‐coated, and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820291009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.