The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flow perfusion culture induces the osteoblastic differentiation of marrow stromal cell‐scaffold constructs in the absence of dexamethasone
Abstract
Flow perfusion culture of scaffold/cell constructs has been shown to enhance the osteoblastic differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells (MSCs) over static culture in the presence of osteogenic supplements including dexamethasone. Although dexamethasone is known to be a powerful induction agent of osteoblast differentiation in MSCs, we hypothesized that the mechanical shear force caused by fluid flow in a flow perfusion bioreactor would be sufficient to induce osteoblast differentiation in the absence of dexamethasone. In this study, we examined the ability of MSCs seeded on titanium fiber mesh scaffolds to differentiate into osteoblasts in a flow perfusion bioreactor in both the presence and absence of dexamethasone. Scaffold/cell constructs were cultured for 8 or 16 days and osteoblastic differentiation was determined by analyzing the constructs for cellularity, alkaline phosphatase activity, and calcium content as well as media samples for osteopontin. For scaffold/cell constructs cultured under flow perfusion, there was greater scaffold cellularity, alkaline phosphatase activity, osteopontin secretion, and calcium deposition compared with static controls, even in the absence of dexamethasone. When dexamethasone was present in the cell culture medium under flow perfusion conditions, there was further enhancement of osteogenic differentiation as evidenced by lower scaffold cellularity, greater osteopontin secretion, and greater calcium deposition. These results suggest that flow perfusion culture alone induces osteogenic differentiation of rat MSCs and that there is a synergistic effect of enhanced osteogenic differentiation when both dexamethasone and flow perfusion culture are used. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 72A: 326–334, 2005
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration
Vo, T. N., Kasper, F. K., & Mikos, A. G. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.016 · Cited by 666
Self-citationKretlow, J. D., Jin, Y.-Q., Liu, W., Zhang, W. J., Hong, T.-H., Zhou, G., Baggett, L. S., Mikos, A. G., & Cao, Y. (2008) · BMC Cell Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2121-9-60 · Cited by 466
Self-citationBiomaterials for stem cell differentiation
Dawson, E., Mapili, G., Erickson, K., Taqvi, S., & Roy, K. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.037 · Cited by 448
Engineering anatomically shaped human bone grafts
Grayson, W. L., Fröhlich, M., Yeager, K., Bhumiratana, S., Chan, M. E., Cannizzaro, C., Wan, L. Q., Liu, X. S., Guo, X. E., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0905439106 · Cited by 425
Datta, N., P. Pham, Q., Sharma, U., Sikavitsas, V. I., Jansen, J. A., & Mikos, A. G. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0505661103 · Cited by 411
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Holtorf, H. L., Jansen, J. A., & Mikos, A. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01-18
- Volume
- 72A
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 326-334
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W2152198035
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flow perfusion culture induces the osteoblastic differentiation of marrow stromal cell‐scaffold constructs in the absence of dexamethasone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.30251
- The paper
- Holtorf, H. L., Jansen, J. A., & Mikos, A. G. (2005). Flow perfusion culture induces the osteoblastic differentiation of marrow stromal cell‐scaffold constructs in the absence of dexamethasone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.