The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Folic acid‐PEG conjugated superparamagnetic nanoparticles for targeted cellular uptake and detection by MRI
Abstract
We report the development and in vitro study of a nanoconjugate serving as a targeted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast enhancement agent for detection of cancer cells overexpressing the folate receptor. The nanoconjugate was synthesized by coating superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with covalently bound bifunctional poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), followed by conjugation with folic acid (FA). The specificity of the nanoconjugate targeting cancerous cells was demonstrated by comparative intracellular uptake of the nanoconjugate and PEG‐/dextran‐coated nanoparticles by human adenocarcinoma HeLa cells. Preferential targeting to cancerous cells was studied by comparing the uptake of the nanoconjugate by HeLa cells and by non‐FR expressing osteosarcoma MG‐63 cells. Uptake of the nanoconjugate by HeLa cells after 4 h incubation was found to be a 12‐fold higher than that of PEG‐ or dextran‐coated nanoparticles as quantified by inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy. A significant negative contrast enhancement was observed with magnetic resonance (MR) phantom imaging for HeLa cells over MG‐63 cells, when both were cultured with the nanoconjugate. Specificity of the nanoconjugate for folate receptors was also verified with a competitive inhibition assay, in which HeLa cells were incubated with both NP–PEG–FA and free FA. The bifunctional PEG used has amide linkages within the PEG chains that can form interchain hydrogen bonding, leading to improved stability of the PEG coating. Self‐assembled PEG can be controlled at the molecular level and are suitable for nanoscale coatings. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2006
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, Y.-X. J., Hussain, S. M., & Krestin, G. P. (2001) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s003300100908 · Cited by 1,381
Cited by
Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Vander Elst, L., & Muller, R. N. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068445e · Cited by 6,852
Reddy, L. H., Arias, J. L., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300068p · Cited by 2,010
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: magnetic nanoplatforms as drug carriers
Wahajuddin, & Arora (2012) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s30320 · Cited by 1,117
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: from preparations to in vivo MRI applications
Qiao, R., Yang, C., & Gao, M. (2009) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b902394a · Cited by 685
Potential Toxicity of Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles: A Review
Malhotra, N., Lee, J.-S., Liman, R. A. D., Ruallo, J. M. S., Villaflores, O. B., Ger, T.-R., & Hsiao, C.-D. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25143159 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, C., Sze, R., & Zhang, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-30
- Volume
- 78A
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 550-557
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W1990585331
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Folic acid‐PEG conjugated superparamagnetic nanoparticles for targeted cellular uptake and detection by MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.30781
- The paper
- Sun, C., Sze, R., & Zhang, M. (2006). Folic acid‐PEG conjugated superparamagnetic nanoparticles for targeted cellular uptake and detection by MRI. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30781
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.