The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vivo evaluation of biodegradable magnesium alloy bone implant in the first 6 months implantation
Open accessAbstract
In vivo degradation of magnesium alloy implant, the bone response to the magnesium, and the effect of the degradation of magnesium on the blood composition and organs were investigated by using light microscopy and scanning electronic microscopy with energy dispersive spectrum. Magnesium alloy showed different degradation rates in the marrow channel and the cortical bone. More degradation of magnesium implant was observed in the marrow channel than in the cortical bone. New bone tissue formed around the magnesium implants after 6 weeks implantation but no fibrous capsule was found. There existed two distinct layers separating the new bone tissue from the magnesium implant. On the magnesium implant side, crystalline magnesium calcium phosphate formed on the surface of the implant due to the reaction between the implant and blood or body fluid. On the new bone tissue side was a 10–30‐μm membrane comprising two distinct layers with many fibroblasts in the layer close to the new bone tissue. The new bone was in tight contact with the implant through the membrane and phosphate layer due to the good osteoconductivity of the phosphate layer. After 10 and 26 weeks postimplantation, more new bone tissues as well as the membrane were found around the implant. However, no apparent increase in the thickness of the membrane was observed with the increasing of the implantation duration. Blood examination has shown that the degradation of the magnesium implant caused little change to blood composition but no disorder to liver or kidneys. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: A review
Staiger, M. P., Pietak, A. M., Huadmai, J., & Dias, G. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003 · Cited by 4,452
In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response
Witte, F., Kaese, V., Haferkamp, H., Switzer, E., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Wirth, C. J., & Windhagen, H. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.049 · Cited by 2,395
In vitro and in vivo corrosion measurements of magnesium alloys
Witte, F., Fischer, J., Nellesen, J., Crostack, H.-A., Kaese, V., Pisch, A., Beckmann, F., & Windhagen, H. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.037 · Cited by 1,386
Fox, J. G., & Bennett, B. T. (2015) · Laboratory Animal Medicine · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-409527-4.00001-8 · Cited by 589
In vivo corrosion behavior of Mg‐Mn‐Zn alloy for bone implant application
Xu, L., Yu, G., Zhang, E., Pan, F., & Yang, K. (2007) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31273 · Cited by 520
Self-citationBiomaterials : an interfacial approach
Hench, L. L., & Ethridge, E. C. (1982) · Academic Press eBooks · Cited by 487
Li, L., Gao, J., & Wang, Y. (2004) · Surface and Coatings Technology · doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.01.004 · Cited by 441
Helsen, J. A., & Breme, H. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 347
ABSORBABLE METAL IN BONE SURGERY: A FURTHER REPORT ON THE USE OF MAGNESIUM ALLOYS
McBRIDE, E. D. (1938) · Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1938.02790530018007 · Cited by 231
Jansen, J. A., van de Waerden, J. P. C. M., Wolke, J. G. C., & De Groot, K. (1991) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820250805 · Cited by 216
Cited by
Bone Tissue Engineering: Recent Advances and Challenges
Amini, A. R., Laurencin, C. T., & Nukavarapu, S. P. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v40.i5.10 · Cited by 2,336
Osteoinduction of bone grafting materials for bone repair and regeneration
García-Gareta, E., Coathup, M. J., & Blunn, G. W. (2015) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2015.07.007 · Cited by 649
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: Achievements, Future, and Sustainability in Asia
Han, F., Wang, J., Ding, L., Hu, Y., Li, W., Yuan, Z., Guo, Q., Zhu, C., Yu, L., Wang, H., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00083 · Cited by 357
Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys: A Review of Material Development and Applications
Persaud-Sharma, D., & McGoron, A. (2012) · Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/jbbte.12.25 · Cited by 287
Alkalization is responsible for antibacterial effects of corroding magnesium
Rahim, M. I., Eifler, R., Rais, B., & Mueller, P. P. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35503 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, E., Xu, L., Yu, G., Pan, F., & Yang, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07-10
- Volume
- 90A
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 882-893
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W2105888628
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo evaluation of biodegradable magnesium alloy bone implant in the first 6 months implantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.32132
- The paper
- Zhang, E., Xu, L., Yu, G., Pan, F., & Yang, K. (2009). In vivo evaluation of biodegradable magnesium alloy bone implant in the first 6 months implantation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
