Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Laser‐layered microfabrication of spatially patterned functionalized tissue‐engineering scaffolds

Mapili, Gazell, Lu, Yi, Chen, Shaochen, Roy, Krishnendu·2005·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials

Abstract

Understanding cell behavior inside complex, three‐dimensional (3D) microenvironments with controlled spatiotemporal patterning of physical and biochemical factors would provide significant insights into the basic biology of organ development and tissue functions. One of the fundamental limitations in studying such behavior has been the inability to create patterned microenvironments within 3D scaffold structures. Here a simple, layer‐by‐layer stereolithography (SL) method that can precisely pattern ligands, extracellular‐matrix (ECM) components, and growth factors, as well as controlled release particles inside a single scaffold, has been developed. The process also allows fabrication of predesigned internal architectures and porosities. Photocrosslinkable poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate (PEGDMA) was used as the basic structural component of these microfabricated scaffolds. PEG acrylates, covalently modified with the cell adhesive peptide arginine‐glycine‐aspartic acid (RGD) or the ECM component heparan sulfate, was incorporated within the scaffolds to facilitate cell attachment and to allow spatial sequestration of heparan‐binding growth factors. Fluorescently labeled polymer microparticles and basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF‐2) were chosen to illustrate the capability of SL to spatiotemporally pattern scaffolds. The results demonstrate that a precise, predesigned distribution of single or multiple factors within a single 3D structure can be created, and specific internal architectures can be fabricated. Functionalization of these scaffolds with RGD is demonstrated, and heparan sulfate allows efficient cell attachment and spatial localization of growth factors. Such patterned scaffolds might provide effective systems to study cell behavior in complex microenvironments and could eventually lead to engineering of complex, hybrid tissue structures through predesigned, multilineage differentiation of a single stem‐cell population. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2005

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.b.30325

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Mapili, G., Lu, Y., Chen, S., & Roy, K.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-15
Volume
75B
Issue
2
Pages
414-424
ISSN
  • 1552-4973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4981
OpenAlex
W1983986887
Cited by
202
References
2
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laser‐layered microfabrication of spatially patterned functionalized tissue‐engineering scaffolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.b.30325
The paper
Mapili, G., Lu, Y., Chen, S., & Roy, K. (2005). Laser‐layered microfabrication of spatially patterned functionalized tissue‐engineering scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30325

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.