Cited by 111Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone health and treatmentsBone Metabolism and Diseases

Treatment with Zoledronate Subsequent to Denosumab in Osteoporosis: a Randomized Trial

Open access
Sølling, Anne Sophie, Harsløf, Torben, Langdahl, Bente·2020·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

Discontinuing denosumab is associated with bone loss and possibly increased fracture risk. We investigated if treatment with zoledronate (ZOL) could prevent bone loss and if the timing of the ZOL infusion influenced the outcome. We report on a 2-year randomized, open label, interventional study including 61 patients with osteopenia, discontinuing denosumab after 4.6 ± 1.6 years. We administrated ZOL 6 months (6M group, n = 20) or 9 months (9M group, n = 20) after the last denosumab injection or when bone turnover had increased (OBS group, n = 21). We monitored the patients with DXA and bone turnover markers. Our primary endpoints were change in lumbar spine BMD (LSBMD) 6 months after ZOL and the proportion of patients who failed to maintain BMD. The study is ongoing (clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03087851). We included 61 participants and 59 patients completed follow-up 12 months after ZOL. Six months after ZOL, LSBMD had decreased significantly by (mean ± SE) 2.1% ± 0.9%, 4.3% ± 1.1%, and 3.0% ± 1.1% in the 6M, 9M, and OBS groups, respectively, and by 4.8% ± 0.7%, 4.1% ± 1.1%, and 4.7% ± 1.2% 12 months after ZOL in the 6M, 9M, and OBS groups, respectively (p < .02, no between-group differences). BMD loss above the least significant change was seen in all groups; at the spine: 6M, n = 6 (30%); 9M, n = 9 (45%); and OBS, n = 9 (47%); and at the total hip: 6M, n = 1 (5%); 9M, n = 5 (25%); and OBS, n = 2 (11%). In the 6M group p-crosslinked C-terminal telopeptide (p-CTX) decreased initially, but increased rapidly thereafter, and 6 months after ZOL, p-CTX was 0.60 ± 0.08 g/L. p-CTX increased rapidly in the 9M and OBS groups, was suppressed by ZOL but increased again thereafter; p-CTX was 0.47 ± 0.05 μg/L and 0.47 ± 0.05 μg/L in the 9M and OBS groups 6 months after ZOL, respectively. Incident vertebral fractures were seen in two women in the 9M group. Treatment with ZOL irrespective of the timing did not fully prevent loss of BMD in patients discontinuing denosumab. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbmr.4098

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Eastell R, Vittinghoff E, Lui LY, et al. Surrogate threshold effect: a novel approach for potential approval of new osteoporosis treatments using change in BMD. Study-level analysis from the FNIH Bone Qual- ity Project. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;32 Suppl 1. [Presented orally at: Annual Meeting American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR); 2019 Sep 20-23; Orlando, FL, USA; Presentation Number: 1090]. Available from: https://www.asbmr.org/education/Abstract Detail?aid=a68865ec-0073-4624-8a7c-c3f93f10efa3. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research n 1870 SØLLING ET AL. 15234681, 2020, 10, Downloaded from https://asbmr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbmr.4098, Wiley Online Library on [14/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sølling, A. S., Harsløf, T., & Langdahl, B.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Sølling, Anne Sophie
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2020-05-27
Volume
35
Issue
10
Pages
1858-1870
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W3030624497
Cited by
111
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9
FWCI
15.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Aarhus Universitet
  • Amgen Foundation
  • Ekspeditionssekretær Cand.Jur. Torkil Steenbecks Legat
  • P. Carl Petersen’s Foundation
  • The Danish Osteoporosis Society
  • Vilhelm Pedersen and wife’s Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
zoledronic acid, denosumab discontinuation, osteoporosis, osteopenia, bone loss, bone turnover markers, C-terminal telopeptide, lumbar spine bone mineral density, fracture risk, RANKL inhibition, bone resorption inhibition, RANKL antibodies
MeSH terms
Denosumab, Zoledronic Acid, Diphosphonates, Humans, Osteoporosis, Bone Density, Bone Remodeling, Bone Density Conservation Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review