The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Classification of vertebral fractures
Abstract
Although it is a cardinal feature of involutional osteoporosis, there is often disagreement on what constitutes a vertebral fracture. We measured vertebrae T4-L5 in 52 healthy women to develop a normal range (mean ± 3 SD) for vertebral shape and used these data to assess the prevalence of vertebral fractures. We classified vertebral fractures by type of deformity (wedge, biconcavity, or compression) and further by the degree of deformity (grades 1 and 2). In 195 postmenopausal women who were an age-stratified random sample of the Rochester population (ages 47–94), 40 (21%) had vertebral fractures (mean, 2 per person). There was a similar number of compression and wedge fractures, and grade 2 fractures were as common as grade 1. In a referral sample of 74 women with suspected osteoporosis, 62 (84%) had vertebral fractures (mean, 3.3 per person). Wedge fractures were most common, and grade 2 fractures were more common than grade 1. The distribution of type and grade of fractures differed between the two patient groups (P < 0.01). Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine was related to mean fracture grade (r = −0.33, P < 0.05) and to fracture number (r = −0.57, P < 0.001) but not to fracture type. We conclude that a comprehensive approach is required in describing vertebral fractures. Using this approach we found distortion in the fracture characteristics of women referred to an osteoporosis clinic compared to women in the community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures
Cummings, S. R., & Melton, L. J. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08657-9 · Cited by 3,821
Self-citationVertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique
Genant, H. K., Wu, C. Y., van Kuijk, C., & Nevitt, M. C. (1993) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650080915 · Cited by 3,691
Black, D. M., Schwartz, A. V., Ensrud, K. E., Cauley, J. A., Levis, S., Quandt, S. A., Satterfield, S., Wallace, R. B., Bauer, D. C., Palermo, L., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.24.2927 · Cited by 1,407
How Many Women Have Osteoporosis?
Melton, L. J., Chrischilles, E. A., Cooper, C., Lane, A. W., & Riggs, B. L. (2005) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2005.20.5.886 · Cited by 708
Self-citationPrevalence and incidence of vertebral deformities
Melton, L. J., Lane, A. W., Cooper, C., Eastell, R., O'Fallon, W. M., & Riggs, B. L. (1993) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/bf01623271 · Cited by 517
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Eastell, R., Cedel, S. L., Wahner, H. W., Riggs, B. L., & Dr. Melton, L. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-03-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-215
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W1987809980
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of vertebral fractures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650060302
- The paper
- Eastell, R., Cedel, S. L., Wahner, H. W., Riggs, B. L., & Dr. Melton, L. J. (1991). Classification of vertebral fractures. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650060302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.