The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation
Abstract
Bone formation was measured in rat tibiae after 12 days of applied loading. Bending forces were applied using a four-point loading apparatus. Sham loads were applied at the same magnitudes as bending forces but the loading pads were arranged so that bending was minimized. Bending and sham loading were applied to the right tibiae of rats and the left tibiae served as contralateral controls. Loading was applied as a sine wave with a frequency of 2 Hz for 18 s (36 cycles) per day. The peak magnitude of applied load was 27, 33, 40, 52, and 64 N. Woven bone was observed on the periosteal surface in all animals subjected to loads of 40 N or greater. Periosteal woven bone formation occurred in both bending and sham loading groups. Woven bone formation on the periosteal surface was either absent or responded at a maximal rate if the stimulus threshold was surpassed. The amount of new woven bone and the woven bone-forming surface were independent of the magnitude of applied strain. Bone formation on the endocortical surface was exclusively lamellar. Lamellar bone formation was stimulated by applied bending of the tibia but not by sham loading. Bending strains above a loading threshold of 40 N or about 1050 μstrain increased both bone-forming surface and the mineral apposition rate and subsequently increased the bone formation rate as much as sixfold. No evidence of increased bone formation was seen for applied strains below 1050 μstrain. Examination of bulk stained sections from animals exposed to the highest applied loads showed no evidence of microcracks. Thus, microcracks have not been implicated as a causal factor for the observed increases in bone formation rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Weaver, C. M., Gordon, C. M., Janz, K. F., Kalkwarf, H. J., Lappe, J. M., Lewis, R., O’Karma, M., Wallace, T. C., & Zemel, B. S. (2016) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-015-3440-3 · Cited by 1,378
Molecular mechanosensors in osteocytes
Qin, L., Liu, W., Cao, H., & Xiao, G. (2020) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/s41413-020-0099-y · Cited by 484
Nikander, R., Sievänen, H., Heinonen, A., Daly, R. M., Uusi-Rasi, K., & Kannus, P. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-47 · Cited by 479
Forwood, M. R. (1996) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650111112 · Cited by 358
Self-citationBone-muscle strength indices for the human lower leg
Rittweger, J., Beller, G., Ehrig, J., Jung, C., Koch, U., Ramolla, J., Schmidt, F., Newitt, D., Majumdar, S., Schiessl, H., et al. (2000) · Bone · doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00327-6 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Dr. Turner, C. H., Forwood, M. R., Rho, J.-Y., & Yoshikawa, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-97
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2027914516
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650090113
- The paper
- Dr. Turner, C. H., Forwood, M. R., Rho, J.-Y., & Yoshikawa, T. (1994). Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650090113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.