The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relationship between body composition and bone mass in women
Abstract
Increasing body weight is associated both with higher bone mass and with lower rates of bone loss. Whether the effects of body weight are mediated by lean body mass (LBM) or fat body mass (FBM) is, however, uncertain because different studies have used different measures of bone mass and arrived at contradictory conclusions. The parameter actually measured is bone mineral content (BMC). Bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral apparent density (BMAD), and the BMD/height attempt to “correct” BMC for differences in bone or body size, but these corrections may bias the analysis of the effects of body composition on the skeleton. To resolve this issue, we measured BMC at the total body, lumbar spine, proximal femur, and forearm using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a population-based sample including 138 premenopausal women (age range 21–54 years, mean 35 years) and 213 postmenopausal women (age range 34–94 years, mean 68 years). BMD, BMAD, and BMD/ height were also calculated for each site. LBM and FBM were determined from the DXA whole body scan. In a multivariate analysis that included age and height, both LBM and FBM predicted total body BMC in pre- and postmenopausal women (p < 0.002 for LBM and FBM in both groups). LBM had a dominant effect on spine and forearm BMC in both groups (p < 0.004) and hip BMC in premenopausal women (p < 0.001), whereas both LBM and FBM predicted hip BMC in postmenopausal women (p < 0.001). However, as BMC was adjusted for bone or body size using BMD, BMAD, or BMD/height, FBM tended to become more important than LBM in the analysis. This was, in part, due to the fact that each of the correction factors in the BMD and BMAD calculations, as well as height, were highly correlated with LBM (r = 0.57 and 0.52 for height versus LBM in pre- and postmenopausal women, respectively [p < 0.001]), and weakly or not at all with FBM (r = 0.08 and 0.11, respectively). Therefore, dividing BMC by these correction factors tended to bias the analysis against potential effects of LBM on bone mass. Thus, the relationship between body composition and bone mass is critically dependent on which bone mass parameter is used in the analysis. Both LBM and FBM have important effects on bone mass, depending on the bone mass parameter used, the skeletal site measured, and menopausal status.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wolff, I., van Croonenborg, J. J., Kemper, H. C. G., Kostense, P. J., & Twisk, J. W. R. (1999) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s001980050109 · Cited by 589
Relationships between fat and bone
Reid, I. R. (2008) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-007-0492-z · Cited by 475
Leptin directly regulates bone cell function in vitro and reduces bone fragility in vivo
Cornish, J., Callon, K., Bava, U., Lin, C., Naot, D., Hill, B., Grey, A., Broom, N., Myers, D., Nicholson, G., et al. (2002) · Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1677/joe.0.1750405 · Cited by 472
Alcohol and bone: review of dose effects and mechanisms
Maurel, D. B., Boisseau, N., Benhamou, C. L., & Jaffre, C. (2012) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-011-1787-7 · Cited by 343
Bolotin, H. H. (2007) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2007.02.022 · Cited by 274
Vilarrasa, N., Gómez, J. M., Elio, I., Gómez-Vaquero, C., Masdevall, C., Pujol, J., Virgili, N., Burgos, R., Sánchez-Santos, R., de Gordejuela, A. G. R., et al. (2009) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-009-9843-5 · Cited by 91
Villalon, K. L., Gozansky, W. S., van Pelt, R. E., Wolfe, P., Jankowski, C. M., Schwartz, R. S., & Kohrt, W. M. (2011) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2011.263 · Cited by 67
“In postmenopausal women, both fat-free mass and fat mass are significant determinants of BMD (7,8).”
BackgroundAndrogens and bone density in women with hypopituitarism.
Miller, K. K., Biller, B. M. K., Hier, J., Arena, E., & Klibanski, A. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.87.6.8557 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Khosla, S., Atkinson, E. J., Riggs, B. L., & Melton, L. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-06-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 857-863
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W1979055801
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.