The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell
Abstract
Quantitative bone assessment today is primarily based on the analysis of bone mineral density (BMD). The geometric properties of bone, which are an important parameter for skeletal strength, are generally not considered in the routine clinical assessment of osteoporosis. This study combined the geometric properties and the BMD values determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) at the distal radius and at the femoral neck to predict fracture loads of the radius, femur, and lumbar vertebrae of 20 cadavers. Generalized osteopenia reduced the fracture loads at all three sites (p < 0.001). The strength of the radius and the femoral neck could best be predicted by considering either the second moment of inertia and trabecular BMD (R = 0.93) or the moment of inertia and the cortical BMD (R = 0.91). The geometric properties at the distal radius were highly correlated with the fracture load at the same skeletal site (R = 0.89) and were also used to estimate the fracture risk at the lumbar vertebrae (R = 0.75) and at the femoral neck (R = 0.87). We conclude that both geometry and density contribute substantially to the strength of the skeleton. The screening for osteoporosis and the prediction of fracture risk can be improved, therefore, by an additional consideration of the geometric properties of the cortex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bone Compressive Strength: The Influence of Density and Strain Rate
Carter, D. R., & Hayes, W. C. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.996549 · Cited by 709
Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration.
Courtney, A. C., Wachtel, E. F., Myers, E. R., & Hayes, W. C. (1995) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199503000-00008 · Cited by 301
Cited by
Kearns, A. E., Khosla, S., & Kostenuik, P. J. (2008) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2007-0014 · Cited by 824
Engelke, K., Adams, J. E., Armbrecht, G., Augat, P., Bogado, C. E., Bouxsein, M. L., Felsenberg, D., Ito, M., Prevrhal, S., Hans, D. B., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Densitometry · doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.010 · Cited by 617
Self-citationBone mechanical properties and changes with osteoporosis
Osterhoff, G., Morgan, E. F., Shefelbine, S. J., Karim, L., McNamara, L. M., & Augat, P. (2016) · Injury · doi:10.1016/s0020-1383(16)47003-8 · Cited by 557
Self-citationLiu, F., Hu, K., Al-Qudsy, L. H., Wu, L.-Q., Wang, Z., Xu, H.-Y., Yang, H., & Yang, P.-F. (2022) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.064 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Augat, P., Reeb, H., & Claes, L. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-09-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1356-1363
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2039038256
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650110921
- The paper
- Augat, P., Reeb, H., & Claes, L. E. (1996). Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650110921
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.