The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Converging free energy estimates: MM‐PB(GB)SA studies on the protein–protein complex Ras–Raf
Abstract
Estimating protein–protein interaction energies is a very challenging task for current simulation protocols. Here, absolute binding free energies are reported for the complex H‐Ras/C‐Raf1 using the MM‐PB(GB)SA approach, testing the internal consistency and model dependence of the results. Averaging gas‐phase energies (MM), solvation free energies as determined by Generalized Born models (GB/SA), and entropic contributions calculated by normal mode analysis for snapshots obtained from 10 ns explicit‐solvent molecular dynamics in general results in an overestimation of the binding affinity when a solvent‐accessible surface area‐dependent model is used to estimate the nonpolar solvation contribution. Applying the sum of a cavity solvation free energy and explicitly modeled solute–solvent van der Waals interaction energies instead provides less negative estimates for the nonpolar solvation contribution. When the polar contribution to the solvation free energy is determined by solving the Poisson–Boltzmann equation (PB) instead, the calculated binding affinity strongly depends on the atomic radii set chosen. For three GB models investigated, different absolute deviations from PB energies were found for the unbound proteins and the complex. As an alternative to normal‐mode calculations, quasiharmonic analyses have been performed to estimate entropic contributions due to changes of solute flexibility upon binding. However, such entropy estimates do not converge after 10 ns of simulation time, indicating that sampling issues may limit the applicability of this approach. Finally, binding free energies estimated from snapshots of the unbound proteins extracted from the complex trajectory result in an underestimate of binding affinity. This points to the need to exercise caution in applying the computationally cheaper “one‐trajectory‐alternative” to systems where there may be significant changes in flexibility and structure due to binding. The best estimate for the binding free energy of Ras–Raf obtained in this study of −8.3 kcal mol −1 is in good agreement with the experimental result of −9.6 kcal mol −1 , however, further probing the transferability of the applied protocol that led to this result is necessary. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 2: 238–250, 2003
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978
Self-citationPrinciples of protein-protein interactions
Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 · Cited by 2,684
Guerois, R., Nielsen, J. E., & Serrano, L. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00442-4 · Cited by 1,728
Massova, I., & Kollman, P. A. (2000) · Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design · doi:10.1023/a:1008763014207 · Cited by 1,015
Stumber, M., Geyer, M., Graf, R., Robert Kalbitzer, H., Scheffzek, K., & Haeberlen, U. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01010-0 · Cited by 22
Cited by
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Self-citationHou, T., Wang, J., Li, Y., & Wang, W. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100275a · Cited by 2,773
Onufriev, A., Bashford, D., & Case, D. A. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20033 · Cited by 2,507
Self-citationEntropy-Enthalpy Compensation: Role and Ramifications in Biomolecular Ligand Recognition and Design
Chodera, J. D., & Mobley, D. L. (2013) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130318 · Cited by 531
Computational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities
Siebenmorgen, T., & Zacharias, M. (2020) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1448 · Cited by 184
“For example, Gohlke et al.(85,86) investigated the Ras–Raf and Ras–RalGDS complex and reported a binding free energy in good agreement with experiment, however, depending on how conformational entropy was estimated and with errors of about several kcal/mol.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Gohlke, H., & Case, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11-19
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-250
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W2157281740
- Cited by
- 860
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Converging free energy estimates: MM‐PB(GB)SA studies on the protein–protein complex Ras–Raf. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.10379
- The paper
- Gohlke, H., & Case, D. A. (2004). Converging free energy estimates: MM‐PB(GB)SA studies on the protein–protein complex Ras–Raf. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.