Cited by 22Advanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsElectron Spin Resonance StudiesProtein Structure and Dynamics

Observation of slow dynamic exchange processes in RAS protein crystals by 31P solid state NMR spectroscopy

Stumber, Michael, Geyer, Matthias, Graf, Robert, Robert Kalbitzer, Hans, Scheffzek, Klaus, Haeberlen, Ulrich·2002·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

The folding, structure and biological function of many proteins are inherently dynamic properties of the protein molecule. Often, the respective molecular processes are preserved upon protein crystallization, leading, in X-ray diffraction experiments, to a blurring of the electron density map and reducing the resolution of the derived structure. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is known to be an alternative method to study molecular structure and dynamics. We designed and built a probe for phosphorus solid state NMR that allows for the first time to study static properties as well as dynamic processes in single-crystals of a protein by NMR spectroscopy. The sensitivity achieved is sufficient to detect the NMR signal from individual phosphorus sites in a 0.3mm(3) size single-crystal of GTPase Ras bound to the nucleotide GppNHp, that is, the signal from approximately 10(15) phosphorus nuclei. The NMR spectra obtained are discussed in terms of the conformational variability of the active center of the Ras-nucleotide complex. We conclude that, in the crystal, the protein complex exists in three different conformations. Magic angle spinning (MAS) NMR spectra of a powder sample of Ras-GppNHp show a splitting of one of the phosphate resonances and thus confirm this conclusion. The MAS spectra provide, furthermore, evidence of a slow, temperature-dependent dynamic exchange process in the Ras protein crystal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01010-0

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stumber, M., Geyer, M., Graf, R., Robert Kalbitzer, H., Scheffzek, K., & Haeberlen, U.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Medical Research (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Geyer, Matthias
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
323
Issue
5
Pages
899-907
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088629679
Cited by
22
References
40
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Peter und Traudl Engelhorn Stiftung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electron Spin Resonance Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
Ras GTPase, protein dynamics, conformational heterogeneity, single-crystal NMR, 31P solid-state NMR, magic angle spinning, protein crystallization
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Crystallization, Guanylyl Imidodiphosphate, Models, Molecular, Phosphorus, Protein Conformation, Thermodynamics, Crystallography, X-Ray, ras Proteins, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review