Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of 2′‐hydroxyl sampling on the conformational properties of RNA: Update of the CHARMM all‐atom additive force field for RNA

Open access
Denning, Elizabeth J., Priyakumar, U. Deva, Nilsson, Lennart, Mackerell, Alexander D.·2011·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Abstract

Here, we present an update of the CHARMM27 all‐atom additive force field for nucleic acids that improves the treatment of RNA molecules. The original CHARMM27 force field parameters exhibit enhanced Watson‐Crick base pair opening which is not consistent with experiment, whereas analysis of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations show the 2′‐hydroxyl moiety to almost exclusively sample the O3′ orientation. Quantum mechanical (QM) studies of RNA related model compounds indicate the energy minimum associated with the O3′ orientation to be too favorable, consistent with the MD results. Optimization of the dihedral parameters dictating the energy of the 2′‐hydroxyl proton targeting the QM data yielded several parameter sets, which sample both the base and O3′ orientations of the 2′‐hydroxyl to varying degrees. Selection of the final dihedral parameters was based on reproduction of hydration behavior as related to a survey of crystallographic data and better agreement with experimental NMR J‐coupling values. Application of the model, designated CHARMM36, to a collection of canonical and noncanonical RNA molecules reveals overall improved agreement with a range of experimental observables as compared to CHARMM27. The results also indicate the sensitivity of the conformational heterogeneity of RNA to the orientation of the 2′‐hydroxyl moiety and support a model whereby the 2′‐hydroxyl can enhance the probability of conformational transitions in RNA. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2011

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcc.21777

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Denning, E. J., Priyakumar, U. D., Nilsson, L., & Mackerell, A. D.
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-05
Volume
32
Issue
9
Pages
1929-1943
ISSN
  • 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-987X
OpenAlex
W2022430866
Cited by
405
References
1
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of 2′‐hydroxyl sampling on the conformational properties of RNA: Update of the CHARMM all‐atom additive force field for RNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.21777
The paper
Denning, E. J., Priyakumar, U. D., Nilsson, L., & Mackerell, A. D. (2011). Impact of 2′‐hydroxyl sampling on the conformational properties of RNA: Update of the CHARMM all‐atom additive force field for RNA. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21777

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.