Cited by 117Gene Regulatory Network Analysisstochastic dynamics and bifurcationAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

Lattice microbes: High-performance stochastic simulation method for the reaction-diffusion master equation

Open access
Roberts, Elijah, Stone, John E., Luthey‐Schulten, Zaida·2013·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Abstract

Spatial stochastic simulation is a valuable technique for studying reactions in biological systems. With the availability of high‐performance computing (HPC), the method is poised to allow integration of data from structural, single‐molecule and biochemical studies into coherent computational models of cells. Here, we introduce the Lattice Microbes software package for simulating such cell models on HPC systems. The software performs either well‐stirred or spatially resolved stochastic simulations with approximated cytoplasmic crowding in a fast and efficient manner. Our new algorithm efficiently samples the reaction‐diffusion master equation using NVIDIA graphics processing units and is shown to be two orders of magnitude faster than exact sampling for large systems while maintaining an accuracy of ∼0.1%. Display of cell models and animation of reaction trajectories involving millions of molecules is facilitated using a plug‐in to the popular VMD visualization platform. The Lattice Microbes software is open source and available for download at http://www.scs.illinois.edu/schulten/lm © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcc.23130

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lattice Microbes simulations use time steps of the order of microseconds, which allows for a potential feedback loop between these computational approaches.

    “Besides, Lattice Microbes simulations of the Luthey-Schulten group (Roberts et al., 2013) use time steps of the order of microseconds, which allows for a potential feedback loop between these computational approaches.”

    From Molecular dynamics simulation of an entire cell (2023) · cites this paper as Roberts et al., 2013

    Results and Discussion §3.1 reports time steps of 3.0 × 10⁻³ to 3.0 × 10⁻⁴ seconds for the simulations tested—hundreds to thousands of microseconds, rather than steps on the order of microseconds. The proposed feedback loop is the citing authors’ inference, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [20]Roberts E Stone JE Sepulveda L M W Hwu W Luthey-Schulten Z Long time-scale simulations of in vivo diffusion using GPU hardware IEEE 2009
  2. [51]Zhukov S Iones A Kronin G Rendering Techniques 98 (Proceedings of EuroGraphics Workshop on Rendering) 45 55 1998
  3. [52]Stone JE An Efficient Library for Parallel Ray Tracing and Animation Master's thesis Computer Science Department University of Missouri at Rolla 1998
  4. [55]Enos J Steffen C Fullop J Showerman M Shi G Esler K Kindratenko V Stone JE Phillips JC International Conference on Green Computing 317 324 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, E., Stone, J. E., & Luthey‐Schulten, Z.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09-25
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
245-255
ISSN
  • 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-987X
OpenAlex
W2151643303
Cited by
117
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Computational Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM104601)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR005969, P41RR005969)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
reaction-diffusion master equation, spatial stochastic simulation, reaction-diffusion systems, GPU acceleration, cytoplasmic crowding, cell model, high-performance computing, open source software
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Diffusion, DNA, Escherichia coli, Gene Expression Regulation, Models, Biological, Protein Binding, Software, Stochastic Processes, Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review