Evaluation of serum autoantibody levels in the diagnosis of ovarian endometrioma
Open accessAbstract
Objective: We analyzed autoantibodies against tumor‐associated antigens (TAAs) in the serum of patients with endometrioma and healthy controls to determine whether autoantibodies can be accurate biomarkers for the diagnosis of ovarian endometrioma. Methods: Serum samples were obtained from 56 patients with endometriosis and 66 healthy women who served as normal controls. The titers of antibodies against a panel of eight TAAs were analyzed using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Results: We found that the serum IGFII mRNA‐binding protein 1 (IMP1) autoantibody and cyclin B1 autoantibody could discriminate between healthy controls and endometriosis patients (AUC–ROC 0.777; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.694–0.860, P<0.0005, and AUC–ROC 0.614; 95%confidence interval [CI] 0.513–0.714, P=0.031, respectively). Using 0.073 and 0.007 as the cutoff values for IMP1 and Cyclin B1 autoantibody, respectively, the sensitivity and specificity of IMP1 were 85.7 and 63.6%, respectively. When cylcin B1 was combined with IMP1, the specificity increased to 72.7% and the sensitivity slightly decreased to 83.9%. Conclusions: Our data suggest that IMP1 alone or combined with cyclin B1 seems to fulfill the requirements of sensitivity and specificity to become a useful clinical biomarker of endometrioma. However, further studies will be required to establish the predictive value and to support the clinical use of IMP1/cyclin B1 in the diagnosis and/or screening of endometriosis. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 24:357–362, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In patients with ovarian endometrioma, autoantibodies against IMP1 were significantly higher than in healthy controls.
“In patients with ovarian endometrioma, autoantibodies against Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IMP1) were significantly higher than in healthy controls [79].”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [79]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Manual of Clinical Laboratory Immunology
Balows, A. (1997) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/s0732-8893(97)00145-4 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Nielsen, J., Christiansen, J., Lykke-Andersen, J., Johnsen, A. H., Wewer, U. M., & Nielsen, F. C. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.2.1262 · Cited by 721 · see citing works
p53 Antibodies in the sera of patients with various types of cancer: a review.
Soussi, T. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 555 · see citing works
The performance of CA-125 measurement in the detection of endometriosis: a meta-analysis
Mol, B. W. J., Bayram, N., Lijmer, J. G., Wiegerinck, M. A. H. M., Bongers, M. Y., van der Veen, F., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (1998) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00355-0 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Disis, M. L., Pupa, S. M., Gralow, J. R., Dittadi, R., Ménard, S., & Cheever, M. A. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.11.3363 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
The relationship of endometriosis and ovarian malignancy: a review
Nezhat, F. R., Datta, M., Hanson, V., Pejovic, T. B., Nezhat, C., & NEZHAT, C. R. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.007 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Zhang, J.-Y., Chan, E. K. L., Peng, X.-X., & Tan, E. M. (1999) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.189.7.1101 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Autoantibodies as reporters identifying aberrant cellular mechanisms in tumorigenesis
Tan, E. M. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci14451 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Expression of IGF-II mRNA-binding proteins (IMPs) in gonads and testicular cancer
Hammer, N. A., Hansen, T. V. O., Byskov, A. G., Meyts, E. R.-D., Grøndahl, M. L., Bredkjær, H. E., Wewer, U. M., Christiansen, J., & Nielsen, F. C. (2005) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/rep.1.00664 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Regulation of c- myc mRNA Decay by Translational Pausing in a Coding Region Instability Determinant
Lemm, I., & Ross, J. (2002) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.22.12.3959-3969.2002 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Kao, H., Marto, J. A., Hoffmann, T. K., et al. (2001) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.194.9.1313 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Laboratory testing for endometriosis
Bedaiwy, M. A., & Falcone, T. (2003) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cccn.2003.10.021 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Differentially expressed genes in eutopic and ectopic endometrium of women with endometriosis
Meola, J., Silva, J. C. R. E., Dentillo, D. B., Silva, W. A., Veiga-Castelli, L. C., Bernardes, L. Â. D. S., Ferriani, R. A., de Paz, C. C. P., Giuliatti, S., & Martelli, L. R. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.058 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Expression of the RNA-binding protein IMP1 correlates with poor prognosis in ovarian carcinoma
Köbel, M., Weidensdorfer, D., Reinke, C., et al. (2007) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210563 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Kato, T., Hayama, S., Yamabuki, T., et al. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1297 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Johnson, M. C., Torres, M. J., Alves, A., Bacallao, K., Fuentes, A., Vega, M., & Boric, M. A. (2005) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/1477-7827-3-45 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Usefulness of CA19-9 versus CA125 for the diagnosis of endometriosis
Harada, T., Kubota, T., & Asô, T. (2002) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03328-9 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Kitawaki, J., Ishihara, H., Koshiba, H., Kiyomizu, M., Teramoto, M., Kitaoka, Y., & Honjo, H. (2005) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh890 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Zhang, J.-Y., Megliorino, R., Peng, X.-X., Tan, E. M., Chen, Y., & Chan, E. K. L. (2006) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2006.08.010 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Expression of oncofetal RNA‐binding protein CRD‐BP/IMP1 predicts clinical outcome in colon cancer
Dimitriadis, E., Trangas, T. T., Milatos, S., Foukas, P. G., Gioulbasanis, I., Courtis, N., Nielsen, F. C., Pandis, N., Dafni, U. G., Bardi, G., et al. (2007) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.22716 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Gu, L., Shigemasa, K., & Ohama, K. (2004) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo.24.3.671 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Ioannidis, P., Mahaira, L. G., Perez, S. A., et al. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m410036200 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
C‐MYC and IGF‐II mRNA‐binding protein (CRD‐BP/IMP‐1) in benign and malignant mesenchymal tumors
Ioannidis, P., Trangas, T. T., Dimitriadis, E., et al. (2001) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.1512 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Serum and peritoneal abnormalities in endometriosis: potential use as diagnostic markers.
Gupta, S., Agarwal, A. K., Sekhon, L. H., Krajcir, N., Cocuzza, M., & Falcone, T. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Comparison of the clinical value of CA 19-9 versus CA 125 for the diagnosis of endometriosis
Kurdoğlu, Z., Gursoy, R., Kurdoğlu, M., Erdem, M., Erdem, Ö., & Erdem, A. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.022 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
c-myc, c-erb-B2, nm23 and p53 expression in human endometriosis.
Schneider, J., Jiménez, E., Rodríguez, F. J., et al. (1998) · Oncology Reports · doi:10.3892/or.5.1.49 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Tumor-associated antigen arrays to enhance antibody detection for cancer diagnosis
Zhang, J.-Y. (2004) · Cancer Detection and Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.cdp.2003.12.006 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Serum Antiendometrial Antibodies and Diagnosis of Endometriosis
Randall, G. W., Gantt, P. A., Poe‐Zeigler, R. L., Bergmann, C. A., Noel, M. E., Strawbridge, W. R., Richardson‐Cox, B., Hereford, J. R., & Reiff, R. H. (2007) · American Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.2007.00523.x · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Endometriosis Markers: Immunologic Alterations as Diagnostic Indicators for Endometriosis
BOHLER, H. C. L., Gerçel-Taylor, Ç., Lessey, B. A., & Taylor, D. D. (2007) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1177/1933719107307910 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Tang, L., Wang, T., Wu, Y., Zhou, C., & Huang, H. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.041 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Antinuclear antibodies and endometriosis
Dias, J., Oliveira, R. M., & Abrão, M. S. (2006) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.03.005 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis
Fassbender, A., Burney, R. O., F. O, D., D’Hooghe, T., & Giudice, L. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/130854 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
“In patients with ovarian endometrioma, autoantibodies against Insulin-like growth factor 2mRNA-binding protein 1 (IMP1) were significantly higher than in healthy controls [79].”
Noninvasive biomarkers of endometriosis: myth or reality?
Lanišnik Rižner, T. (2014) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1586/14737159.2014.899905 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yi, Y., Wang, S., Chao, C., Su, C., Lee, Y., & Chen, L.
- Affiliations
- Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
- Chung Shan Medical University (TW)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 357-362
- ISSN
- 0887-8013 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2825
- PMC
- PMC6647576
- OpenAlex
- W1997544588
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Chung Shan Medical University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Keywords
- endometrioma, endometriosis, serum autoantibodies, tumor-associated antigens, IMP-1, cyclin B1, diagnostic biomarkers, sensitivity and specificity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Autoantibodies, Endometriosis, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Tumor, Case-Control Studies, RNA-Binding Proteins, Young Adult, Cyclin B1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review