Cited by 54Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Respiratory feedback for treating panic disorder

Open access
Meuret, Alicia E., Wilhelm, Frank H., Roth, Walton T.·2004·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Panic disorder patients often complain of shortness of breath or other respiratory complaints, which has been used as evidence for both hyperventilation and false suffocation alarm theories of panic. Training patients to change their breathing patterns is a common intervention, but breathing rarely has been measured objectively in assessing the patient or monitoring therapy results. We report a new breathing training method that makes use of respiratory biofeedback to teach individuals to modify four respiratory characteristics: increased ventilation (Respiratory Rate × Tidal Volume), breath‐to‐breath irregularity in rate and depth, and chest breathing. As illustrated by a composite case, feedback of respiratory rate and end‐tidal pCO 2 can facilitate voluntary control of respiration and reduce symptoms. Respiratory monitoring may provide relevant diagnostic, prognostic, and outcome information. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol/In Session.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.10245

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial case studies supported the potential usefulness of capnometry-assisted breathing training.

    “Initial case studies supported the potential usefulness of this approach (Meuret et al., 2001; Meuret et al., 2004).”

    From Feedback of end-tidal pCO2 as a therapeutic approach for panic disorder (2008) · cites this paper as Meuret et al., 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meuret, A. E., Wilhelm, F. H., & Roth, W. T.
Affiliations
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Meuret, Alicia E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-12-10
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
197-207
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W2085342209
Cited by
54
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 56094, R01MH056094)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
panic disorder, respiratory biofeedback, breathing exercises, hyperventilation, end-tidal PCO2, respiratory rate, tidal volume, chest breathing, dyspnea, respiratory monitoring
MeSH terms
Biofeedback, Psychology, Breathing Exercises, Female, Humans, Hyperventilation, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Respiration, Respiratory Therapy, Tape Recording, Tidal Volume, Panic Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review