The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Trier Treatment Navigator (TTN) in action: Clinical case study on data‐informed psychological therapy
Open accessAbstract
Background: Although psychotherapy has shown to be effective for most patients, about one‐third of patients do not benefit or deteriorate during treatment. Technical progress has allowed the integration of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) into treatment, helping therapists detect patients at risk for a nonresponse or poor outcome early on. Psychological therapy can be enhanced by providing therapists with individual treatment recommendations for these at‐risk patients. One example of such a comprehensive feedback system is the Trier Treatment Navigator (TTN). Objective/Method: This clinical case study aims to illustrate the implementation of the TTN in a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) outpatient clinic in the treatment of a 30‐year‐old patient called Ms. Daun, who has a recurrent depressive disorder. Based on this case, the benefits of applying information from ROM in psychotherapy, important context factors, and possible implementation issues are discussed. Results/Conclusion: We conclude by encouraging practitioners to integrate ROM into their clinical thinking and daily practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Based on Trier Treatment Navigator information, the therapist can work on an initial case formulation.
“Based on this information, the therapist can work on an initial CF (Schaffrath et al., 2022).”
From Data-Informed Case Formulation with the Trier Treatment Navigator (2022) · cites this paper as Schaffrath et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M. J., & Smart, D. W. (2010) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019247 · Cited by 657
Lutz, W., Rubel, J. A., Schwartz, B., Schilling, V., & Deisenhofer, A.-K. (2019) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2019.103438 · Cited by 196
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1037/cou0000286 · DOI
- Castonguay L. C., 2013, Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 85
- Eubanks C. F., 2019, Handbook of psychotherapy integration, 88
- Grawe K., 1994, Psychotherapie im Wandel. Von der Konfession zur Profession
- 10.1037/0003-066X.51.10.1059 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1176/appi.ps.201400141 · DOI
- 10.1037/pst0000167 · DOI
- Lambert M. J., 2007, Clinical support tools manual‐brief version‐40
- Lutz W., 2010, Lehrbuch psychotherapie [Textbook psychotherapy]
- 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071720-014821 · DOI
- 10.1026/0012-1924.52.1.11 · DOI
- Lutz W., 2021, Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 89
- 10.1037/ccp0000642 · DOI
- 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.133 · DOI
- 10.1002/jclp.20107 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data-Informed Case Formulation with the Trier Treatment Navigator
Moggia, D., Schaffrath, J., Bommer, J., Weinmann-Lutz, B., & Lutz, W. (2022) · Revista de Psicoterapia · doi:10.33898/rdp.v33i123.35971 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaffrath, J., Weinmann‐Lutz, B., & Lutz, W.
- Affiliations
- Universität Trier (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schaffrath, Jana
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-04-18
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2016-2028
- ISSN
- 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4679
- OpenAlex
- W4223993866
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- routine outcome monitoring, treatment response prediction, cognitive behavioral therapy, recurrent depression, clinical implementation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Psychotherapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Connectin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
