Cited by 52Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCrime Patterns and Interventions

THE RELATION BETWEEN RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS FOR PROBLEM BEHAVIORS AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS, ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR, AND ALCOHOL USE IN ADOLESCENCE

Open access
Monahan, Kathryn C., Oesterle, Sabrina, Rhew, Isaac, Hawkins, J. David·2014·Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Both externalizing and internalizing psychopathology increase throughout adolescence and a similar set of risk and protective factors may underlie depressive symptoms, antisocial behavior, and alcohol use. Analyses test how risk and protective factors for externalizing behavior in community, school, family, peer, and individual domains are related to depressive symptoms, antisocial behavior, and alcohol use concurrently and longitudinally in a sample of 2,002 students assessed in 8 th and 10 th grades (52% male; 58% Caucasian). Findings indicate that risk and protective factors for antisocial behavior and alcohol use are also associated with depressive symptoms, both concurrently and longitudinally. Prevention approaches that target risk and protective factors for externalizing problems may have crossover effects on depressive symptoms during adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcop.21642

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Community Youth Development Study reported that the Communities that Care system increased adoption of evidence-based programs and reduced youth substance use and violence.

    “This study found that the CTC decision support system led to greater adoption of evidence-based programs and prevented youth substance use and violence.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monahan, K. C., Oesterle, S., Rhew, I., & Hawkins, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Monahan, Kathryn C.
Venue
Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-11
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
621-638
ISSN
  • 0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6629
OpenAlex
W2098499511
Cited by
52
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA015183-03)
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
risk and protective factors, adolescent depression, depressive symptoms, antisocial behavior, adolescent alcohol use, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, prevention programs, crossover effects, family factors, peer factors, school factors, community factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review