Cited by 23Homelessness and Social IssuesSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

The life-enhancing alcohol-management program: results from a 6-month nonrandomized controlled pilot study assessing a community based participatory research program in housing first

Open access
Clifasefi, Seema L., Collins, Susan E., The LEAP Advisory Board·2020·Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

A 2‐arm, 6‐month, nonrandomized controlled pilot trial was conducted to test the initial effectiveness of the Life Enhancing Alcohol‐management Program (LEAP) as an adjunct to Housing First (HF; e.g., permanent supportive housing) on alcohol and quality‐of‐life (QoL) outcomes. The LEAP entails resident‐driven leadership opportunities, meaningful activities, and pathways to recovery aimed at reducing alcohol‐related harm and improving QoL. Data analyses were conducted to test between‐ and within‐subjects effects of the LEAP on self‐reported alcohol and QoL outcomes among HF residents. At the 6‐month follow up, between groups analysis revealed nonsignificant findings for alcohol quantity or alcohol‐related harm (ps > 0.06); however, LEAP participants reported significantly more engagement in meaningful activities than control participants ( p < .001), and within‐subjects analyses indicated that high levels of LEAP programming engagement predicted significant reductions in alcohol quantity and alcohol‐related harm (ps < 0.01). The LEAP was associated with increased engagement in meaningful activities, and greater involvement in the LEAP programming was associated with reduced alcohol use and alcohol‐related harm. Planning is underway for a future, large‐scale randomized controlled trial to establish the efficacy of this approach, its generalizability across HF programs, and potential mechanisms of action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcop.22291

Cites

43 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A nonrandomized pilot study examined a second adjunct intervention known as the Life-Enhancing Alcohol-management Program.

    “A nonrandomized pilot study examined a second adjunct intervention known as the Life-Enhancing Alcohol-management Program (Clifasefi et al., 2020).”
  • In people with a history of chronic homelessness and Alcohol Use Disorder, no differences in alcohol-related harm were found between the HF with and without adjunct LEAP intervention groups.

    “no differences in alcohol-related harm were found between the two groups”
  • Two studies in this review highlighted the feasibility of implementing adjunct interventions to facilitate behavioural change related to alcohol harms.

    “Two studies in our review (Clifasefi et al., 2020; Kennedy et al., 2018) highlighted the feasibility of implementing adjunct interventions to facilitate behavioural change related to alcohol harms.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Clifasefi SL, Collins SE, Torres NI, Grazioli VS, & Mackelprang JL (2016). Housing First, but what comes second? A qualitative study of resident, staff and management perspectives on single-site Housing First program enhancement. Journal of Community Psychology, 44(7), 845– 855. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21812 28579653 PMC5451125 · DOI
  2. Harrington M, & Dawson D (1997). Recreation as empowerment for homeless people living in shelters. Journal of Leisurability, 24(1), 17– 29. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500126 · DOI
  3. Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel J, & Minkler M (2017). Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity (3rd edition). San Franciso: Jossey Bass.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clifasefi, S. L., Collins, S. E., & The LEAP Advisory Board
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Clifasefi, Seema L.
Venue
Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-28
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
763-776
ISSN
  • 0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6629
OpenAlex
W2990368081
Cited by
23
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K01AA21147, R34AA022077)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
Housing First, permanent supportive housing, alcohol consumption, alcohol-related harm, quality of life, meaningful activities, community-based participatory research, alcohol recovery, program engagement
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Female, Housing, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Harm Reduction, Community-Based Participatory Research, Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review