The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inhibition of RNA synthesis by actinomycin D: Characteristic dose‐response of different RNA species
Abstract
A quantitative dose‐response study was made of the inhibition by actinomycin D of the synthesis of various RNA species in cultured L cells. After a suitable preincubation with various concentrations of actinomycin, synthesis was measured by a brief incorporation of radioactive uridine. The 45S precursor of ribosomal RNA, 5S ribosomal RNA, transfer RNA and various sized fractions of heterogeneous nuclear RNA were extracted from the appropriate subcellular fractions and resolved by acrylamide gel electrophoresis. Polyribosomal messenger RNA was also studied. Over the range of actinomycin concentrations employed cellular uptake of the drug is proportional to external concentration, and maximal inhibition of RNA synthesis is generally achieved within one hour after exposure. For most of the RNA species studied the dose‐response data appear to follow an exponential inactivation function with some “tailing” evident at the higher doses. Sensitivities, defined as the reciprocal of the dose necessary to reduce synthesis to 1/e of the control level, were compared and examined with respect to the molecular weight of the RNA species under consideration. Among the heterogeneous nuclear RNA's there is a good correlation between RNA size and sensitivity, such that the sensitivity per unit molecular weight is relatively constant. A similar relationship is roughly applicable to the ribosomal and transfer RNA's when taken as a group, although in this case the sensitivity per unit molecular weight is 50 to 100 fold greater. A model is proposed in which this marked difference in actinomycin sensitivity arises as a consequence of the transcription of stretches of contiguous repetitive genes by RNA polymerase molecules which attach to the DNA only at a limited number of entry points, the highest probability of attachment being at the beginning of a stretch.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Visualization of nucleolar genes
Miller, O. L., & Beatty, B. R. (1969) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.164.3882.955 · Cited by 876
Cited by
Shuttling of pre-mRNA binding proteins between nucleus and cytoplasm
Piñol-Roma, S., & Dreyfuss, G. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/355730a0 · Cited by 834
Kaikkonen, M. U., Spann, N. J., Heinz, S., Romanoski, C. E., Allison, K. A., Stender, J. D., Chun, H. B., Tough, D. F., Prinjha, R. K., Benner, C., et al. (2013) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.010 · Cited by 672
Regulation of HDM2 activity by the ribosomal protein L11
Lohrum, M. A. E., Ludwig, R. L., Kubbutat, M. H. G., Hanlon, M., & Vousden, K. H. (2003) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00134-x · Cited by 623
Signaling to p53: ribosomal proteins find their way
Zhang, Y., & Lu, H. (2009) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.09.024 · Cited by 591
Inhibiting eukaryotic transcription: which compound to choose? How to evaluate its activity
Bensaude, O. (2011) · Transcription · doi:10.4161/trns.2.3.16172 · Cited by 574
Metadata
- Authors
- Perry, R. P., & Kelley, D. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1970-10
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-139
- ISSN
- 0021-9541 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4652
- OpenAlex
- W2156506178
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition of RNA synthesis by actinomycin D: Characteristic dose‐response of different RNA species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcp.1040760202
- The paper
- Perry, R. P., & Kelley, D. E. (1970). Inhibition of RNA synthesis by actinomycin D: Characteristic dose‐response of different RNA species. Journal of Cellular Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1040760202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.