The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clonal growth of normal human epidermal keratinocytes in a defined medium
Abstract
Colony formation by normal human epidermal keratinocytes (HK) has been achieved in a medium that contains no deliberately added undefined supplements. The term “defined” is used to describe this medium, although the possibility that trace contaminants in its components could be contributing to the multiplication that it supports cannot yet be ruled out completely. The defined medium consists of a basal medium, MCDB 152, supplemented with 5 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF), 10 μg/ml transferrin, 5 μg/ml insulin, 1.4 × 10−6 M hydrocortisone, 1.0 × 10−5 M ethanolamine, 1.0 × 10−5 M phosphoethanolamine, and 2.0 × 10−9 M progesterone. MCDB 152 differs from MCDB 151, previously developed for multiplication of HK with small amounts of dialyzed serum (Peehl and Ham, 1980b), only by addition of the trace element mixture from human fibroblast medium MCDB 104 (McKeehan et al., 1977). Most of the requirement for transferrin, which is the least defined component of the defined medium, can be replaced by adding freshly dissolved and sterilized ferrous sulfate to the final medium after it has been filter sterilized. Insulin and EGF are clearly needed for optimal multiplication and hydrocortisone is mildly beneficial. Either ethanolamine or phosphoethanolamine must be present in the defined medium for HK multiplication. There is a greater need for EGF and less for hydrocortisone in the defined medium than in previous partially defined systems that we have worked with. Very large colonies of flattened epithelial cells are obtained in the defined medium, which has a low calcium concentration (0.03 mM) and does not favor keratinocyte differentiation. Less growth and more differentiation are obtained with higher calcium concentrations. The defined medium is highly selective for keratinocyte growth from a mixed inoculum of keratinocytes and fibroblasts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clonal growth of mammalian cells in a chemically defined, synthetic medium
Ham, R. G. (1965) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.53.2.288 · Cited by 837
Self-citation
Cited by
Boyce, S. T., & Ham, R. G. (1983) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12540422 · Cited by 1,083
Self-citationRosdy, M., & Clauss, L.-C. (1990) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12555510 · Cited by 280
Boyce, S. T., & Ham, R. G. (1985) · Journal of Tissue Culture Methods · doi:10.1007/bf01797779 · Cited by 263
Self-citationE-cadherin and P-cadherin have partially redundant roles in human epidermal stratification
Jensen, P. J., Telegan, B., Lavker, R. M., & Wheelock, M. J. (1997) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s004410050816 · Cited by 54
Human mast cells produce and differentially express both soluble and membrane‐bound stem cell factor
Welker, Grabbe, Gibbs, Zuberbier, & Henz (1999) · Scandinavian Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3083.1999.00519.x · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsao, M. C., Walthall, B. J., & Ham, R. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-02
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-229
- ISSN
- 0021-9541 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4652
- OpenAlex
- W2153929601
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clonal growth of normal human epidermal keratinocytes in a defined medium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcp.1041100217
- The paper
- Tsao, M. C., Walthall, B. J., & Ham, R. G. (1982). Clonal growth of normal human epidermal keratinocytes in a defined medium. Journal of Cellular Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041100217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.