Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Crosstalk of ER stress‐mediated autophagy and ER‐phagy: Involvement of UPR and the core autophagy machinery

Song, Shuling, Tan, Jin, Miao, Yuyang, Zhang, Qiang·2018·Journal of Cellular Physiology

Abstract

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, a common cellular stress response, is closely related to the activation of autophagy that is an important and evolutionarily conserved mechanism for maintaining cellular homeostasis. Autophagy induced by ER stress mainly includes the ER stress‐mediated autophagy and ER‐phagy. The ER stress‐mediated autophagy is characterized by the generation of autophagosomes that include worn‐out proteins, protein aggregates, and damaged organelles. While the autophagosomes of ER‐phagy selectively include ER membranes, and the double membranes also derive, at least in part, from the ER. The signaling pathways of IRE1α, PERK, ATF6, and Ca 2+ are necessary for the activation of ER stress‐mediated autophagy, while the receptor‐mediated selective ER‐phagy degrades the ER is Atg40/FAM134B. The ER stress‐mediated autophagy and ER‐phagy not only have differences, but also have connections. The activation of ER‐phagy requires the core autophagy machinery, and the ER‐phagy may be a branch of ER stress‐mediated autophagy that selectively targets the ER. However, the determined factors that control the changeover switch between ER stress‐mediated autophagy and ER‐phagy are largely obscure, which may be associated with the type of cells and the extent of stimulation. This review summarized the crosstalk between ER stress‐mediated autophagy and ER‐phagy and their signaling networks. Additionally, we discussed the possible factors that influence the type of autophagy induced by ER stress.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcp.26137

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Song, S., Tan, J., Miao, Y., & Zhang, Q.
Venue
Journal of Cellular Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-30
Volume
233
Issue
5
Pages
3867-3874
ISSN
  • 0021-9541 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4652
OpenAlex
W2744123648
Cited by
361
References
46
FWCI
22.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crosstalk of ER stress‐mediated autophagy and ER‐phagy: Involvement of UPR and the core autophagy machinery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcp.26137
The paper
Song, S., Tan, J., Miao, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Crosstalk of ER stress‐mediated autophagy and ER‐phagy: Involvement of UPR and the core autophagy machinery. Journal of Cellular Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.26137

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.