Cited by 42Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods

Impact of Target‐Mediated Elimination on the Dose and Regimen of Evolocumab, a Human Monoclonal Antibody Against Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9)

Open access
Gibbs, John P., Doshi, Sameer, Kuchimanchi, Mita, Grover, Anita, Emery, Maurice G., Dodds, Michael G., Gibbs, Megan A., Somaratne, Ransi +2 more·2017·The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Understanding the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) exhibiting target‐mediated drug disposition (TMDD) is critical for selecting optimal dosing regimens. We describe the PK/PD relationship of evolocumab using a mathematical model that captures evolocumab binding and removal of unbound PCSK9 as well as reduction in circulating low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C). Data were pooled from 2 clinical studies: a single‐dose escalation study in healthy subjects (7‐420 mg SC; n = 44) and a multiple‐dose escalation study in statin‐treated hypercholesterolemic patients (14 mg weekly to 420 mg monthly [QM] SC; n = 57). A TMDD model described the time course of unbound evolocumab concentrations and removal of unbound PCSK9. The estimated linear clearance and volume of evolocumab were 0.256 L/day and 2.66 L, respectively, consistent with other monoclonal antibodies. The time course of LDL‐C reduction was described by an indirect response model with the elimination rate of LDL‐C being modulated by unbound PCSK9. The concentration of unbound PCSK9 associated with half‐maximal inhibition (IC 50) of LDL‐C elimination was 1.46 nM. Based on simulations, 140 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) and 420 mg QM were predicted to achieve a similar time‐averaged effect of 69% reduction in LDL‐C in patients on statin therapy, suggesting that an approximate 3‐fold dose increase is required for a 2‐fold extension in the dosing interval. Evolocumab dosing regimens of 140 mg Q2W or 420 mg QM were predicted to result in comparable reductions in LDL‐C over a monthly period, consistent with results from recently completed phase 3 studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcph.840

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gibbs et al. demonstrated the critical importance of characterizing target-mediated clearance in selecting an optimal dosing regimen for the PCSK9 antibody evolocumab; their TMDD PK/PD modeling suggested that doubling the dose and extending the dosing interval from biweekly to monthly did not adequately maintain the reduction in LDL-C, and a higher dose was required to maintain stable LDL-C levels

    “For example, Gibbs et al. demonstrated the critical importance of characterizing target‐mediated clearance in selecting an optimal dosing regimen for protein convertase substilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) antibody evolucumab.37 Their target‐mediated drug disposition PK/PD modeling suggested that doubling the dose and extending the dosing interval from biweekly to monthly did not adequately maintain”
  • PK/PD analysis using unbound evolocumab, unbound PCSK9, and LDL-C data has enabled dose and regimen selection in clinical trials.

    “PK/PD analysis using unbound evolocumab, unbound PCSK9, and LDL‐C data has enabled dose and regimen selection in clinical trials37”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibbs, J. P., Doshi, S., Kuchimanchi, M., Grover, A., Emery, M. G., Dodds, M. G., Gibbs, M. A., Somaratne, R., Wasserman, S. M., & Blom, D.
Affiliations
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Gibbs, John P.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-15
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
616-626
ISSN
  • 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2700
  • 1552-4604
OpenAlex
W2550315736
Cited by
42
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Amgen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Keywords
evolocumab, PCSK9, target-mediated drug disposition, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling, LDL cholesterol lowering, monoclonal antibodies, dosing regimen optimization, indirect response model, mathematical pharmacokinetic model
MeSH terms
PCSK9 Inhibitors, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Biological Availability, Female, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review