Tutorial on monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics and its considerations in early development
Open accessAbstract
The tutorial introduces the readers to the fundamentals of antibody pharmacokinetics (PK) in the context of drug development. Topics covered include an overview of antibody development, PK characteristics, and the application of antibody PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) in research and development decision‐making. We also discuss the general considerations for planning a nonclinical PK program and describe the types of PK studies that should be performed during early development of monoclonal antibodies.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This tutorial reviews monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics, including absorption, distribution, catabolism, target-mediated clearance, immunogenicity, and translational PK/PD considerations in early development. It emphasizes that mAb PK is driven by interactions with antigen, FcγRs, and FcRn, and that PK/PD modeling supports lead selection, preclinical species choice, human PK projection, and first-in-human dose selection.
Key findings
- Systemically administered mAbs typically show biphasic PK, confined distribution to vascular/interstitial space, long half-lives of ∼11–30 days in humans from FcRn-mediated recycling, and nonlinear PK due to target-mediated clearance.
- Marketed mAbs exhibit clearance values between 90–560 mL/day and half-lives between 11–30 days, comparable to endogenous IgG half-life (∼21 days); volume of distribution is generally 3–8 L at steady state.
- Subcutaneous bioavailability varies between 50–90% with maximum plasma concentrations often reached around 3–7 days postdosing, whereas oral bioavailability is typically <1–2%.
- In a survey of recently approved mAbs, immunogenicity incidence rates varied from 0% to as high as 42%; ADA formation may accelerate mAb clearance and affect exposure, efficacy, and safety.
Methods
- Design: narrative tutorial/review introducing fundamentals of antibody PK and its application in early drug development decision-making.
- Data or sample: synthesizes published literature and tabulates PK parameters for marketed mAbs (2011–2017) as indicated in their labels; notes over 60 marketed antibodies in the United States and ∼350 new antibody entities in active clinical development.
- Main analysis: narrative synthesis of mAb-specific PK concepts, comparison tables between small molecules and mAbs, and discussion of preclinical/clinical PK/PD translation; no primary experimental study or meta-analysis is reported.
Limitations
- The paper states no formal limitations section.
- Evident from the text: this is a tutorial/narrative review rather than a systematic review or primary investigation, so it does not provide new experimental data or quantitative synthesis.
- Evident from the text: Table 3 contains blank cells and notes some values are not reported (e.g., daratumumab immunogenicity not reported due to assay interference); the paper also states that immunogenicity in preclinical species cannot predict the incidence of human ADAs.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 106 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
From a survey of recently approved mAbs, immunogenicity incidence rates varied from 0% to as high as 42%.
“From a survey of recently approved mAbs, immunogenicity incidence rates varied from 0% to as high as 42% (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Marketed antibodies often show relatively narrow ranges of PK parameters.
“Marketed antibodies often show relatively narrow ranges of PK parameters (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Alemtuzumab, an antibody targeting CD52-expressing tumor cells, showed time-dependent PK with decreased clearance and extended half-life as tumor burden decreases after repeated dosing.
“For example, alemtuzumab, an antibody targeting CD52‐expressing tumor cells, showed time‐dependent PK with decreased clearance and extended half‐life as tumor burden decreases after repeated dosing.36”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Mould, D.R. et al Population pharmacokinetics‐pharmacodynamics of alemtuzumab (Campath) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and its link to treatment response. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 64, 278– 291 (2007). 17506867 PMC2000651 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Factors influencing mAbs distribution to individual organs or tissues include drug-specific features such as binding affinity to target antigens, target internalization rate, mAb hydrophilicity, and charge, and tissue-specific features such as membrane structure and blood flow.
“Additional factors influencing mAbs distribution to individual organs or tissues include: drug‐specific features such as their binding affinity to specific target antigens, targets internalization rate,24 mAb hydrophilicity, charge,25 and tissue‐specific features such as membrane structure and blood flow.26”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [24] Rudnick, S.I. & Adams, G.P. Affinity and avidity in antibody‐based tumor targeting. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 24, 155– 161 (2009). 19409036 PMC2902227 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Boswell, C.A., Tesar, D.B., Mukhyala, K., Theil, F.P., Fielder, P.J. & Khawli, L.A. Effects of charge on antibody tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics. Bioconjug. Chem. 21, 2153– 2163 (2010). 21053952 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Deng, R., Jin, F., Prabhu, S. & Iyer, S. Monoclonal antibodies: what are the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for drug development? Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 8, 141– 160 (2012). 22248267 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Non-human primate models are often used for early assessment of bioavailability because of their physiological and biochemical proximity to humans.
“Non‐human primate (NHP) models are often used for early assessment of bioavailability for their physiological and biochemical proximity to humans.21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Datta‐Mannan, A., Witcher, D.R., Lu, J. & Wroblewski, V.J. Influence of improved FcRn binding on the subcutaneous bioavailability of monoclonal antibodies in cynomolgus monkeys. MAbs. 4, 267– 273 (2012). 22377715 PMC3361662 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Fc-mediated effector functions upon antibody-antigen interaction may contribute to observed clearance by depleting target cells, as shown for rituximab.
“For example, Fc‐mediated effector functions (ADCC or CDC) upon antibody–antigen interaction may contribute to observed clearance by depleting target cells, as shown for rituximab.34”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Golay, J. et al Lessons for the clinic from rituximab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. MAbs. 5, 826– 837 (2013). 23933992 PMC3896596 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Elimination of mAbs through the kidney is considered insignificant, since typical mAb molecular weight (150 kDa) is higher than the glomerular filtration threshold (~55 kDa).
“Elimination of mAbs through the kidney is considered insignificant, since typical mAb molecular weight (150 kDa) is higher than the glomerular filtration threshold (∼55 kDa).23”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Lobo, E.D., Hansen, R.J. & Balthasar, J.P. Antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. J. Pharm. Sci. 93, 2645– 2668 (2004). 15389672 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Because blood capillaries only allow substances with less than 16 kDa to reach systemic circulation, s.c. or i.m. administered mAbs presumably enter the circulation through lymphatic fluid drainage.
“Since blood capillaries only allow substances with less than 16 kDa to reach systemic circulation, s.c. or i.m. administered mAbs presumably enter the circulation through lymphatic fluid drainage.19”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Glassman, P.M., Abuqayyas, L. & Balthasar, J.P. Assessments of antibody biodistribution. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 55 (Suppl 3), S29– S38, (2015). 25707961 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Improved understanding of the IgG-FcRn interaction along with advances in protein engineering has led to opportunities to engineer mAbs with extended half-life.
“Improved understanding of the IgG‐FcRn interaction along with advances in protein engineering has led to opportunities to engineer mAbs with extended half‐life.32”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Robbie, G.J. et al A novel investigational Fc‐modified humanized monoclonal antibody, motavizumab‐YTE, has an extended half‐life in healthy adults. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 6147– 6153 (2013). 24080653 PMC3837853 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
FcRn protects the internalized antibody from rapid intracellular catabolism.
“One key mediator of this process is the FcRn, which protects the internalized antibody from rapid intracellular catabolism.30”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Roopenian, D.C. & Akilesh, S. FcRn: the neonatal Fc receptor comes of age. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7, 715– 725 (2007). 17703228 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Nonspecific clearance is considered dose-independent since most therapeutic antibodies at clinically relevant dose levels would fall far below the circulating endogenous IgG levels of ~10 g/ml.
“Nonspecific clearance is considered dose‐independent since most therapeutic antibodies at clinically relevant dose levels would fall far below the circulating endogenous IgG levels of ∼10 g/ml.23”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Lobo, E.D., Hansen, R.J. & Balthasar, J.P. Antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. J. Pharm. Sci. 93, 2645– 2668 (2004). 15389672 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Despite efforts in predicting mAbs bioavailability in humans using preclinical models, the translatability remains uncertain.
“Despite efforts in predicting mAbs bioavailability in humans using preclinical models, the translatability remains uncertain.20”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Richter, W.F., Bhansali, S.G. & Morris, M.E. Mechanistic determinants of biotherapeutics absorption following SC administration. AAPS J. 14, 559– 570 (2012). 22619041 PMC3385825 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Many factors, such as antibody properties (hydrophobicity, charge, glycosylation patterns), intersubject variability (disease status, body size, genetic polymorphisms, concomitant medication, comorbidities), and immune-mediated response generated by mAbs administration, can also impact mAb clearance.
“Many other factors, such as antibody properties (hydrophobicity, charge,38 glycosylation patterns39), intersubject variability (disease status, body size, genetic polymorphisms, concomitant medication, comorbidities, etc.40), and immune‐mediated response generated by mAbs administration can also impact mAb clearance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [38] Schoch, A. et al Charge‐mediated influence of the antibody variable domain on FcRn‐dependent pharmacokinetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5997– 6002 (2015). 25918417 PMC4434771 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Bumbaca, D., Boswell, C.A., Fielder, P.J. & Khawli, L.A. Physiochemical and biochemical factors influencing the pharmacokinetics of antibody therapeutics. AAPS J. 14, 554– 558 (2012). 22610647 PMC3385840 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Gill, K.L., Machavaram, K.K., Rose, R.H. & Chetty, M. Potential Sources of Inter‐Subject Variability in Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 55, 789– 805 (2016). 26818483 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Physicochemical properties including hydrated size, charge, hydrophobicity, electrophoretic mobility, isoelectric point, and glycosylation can potentially influence mAb PK.
“Physiochemical properties including hydrated size (Stokes radius), charge, hydrophobicity, electrophoretic mobility, isoelectric point (pI), and glycosylation can potentially influence mAb PK.38, 39”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [38] Schoch, A. et al Charge‐mediated influence of the antibody variable domain on FcRn‐dependent pharmacokinetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5997– 6002 (2015). 25918417 PMC4434771 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Bumbaca, D., Boswell, C.A., Fielder, P.J. & Khawli, L.A. Physiochemical and biochemical factors influencing the pharmacokinetics of antibody therapeutics. AAPS J. 14, 554– 558 (2012). 22610647 PMC3385840 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The primary mechanism of antibody diffusion in tissues is through convective transport through paracellular pores in vascular endothelial cell membranes.
“The primary mechanism of antibody diffusion in tissues is through the convective transport through paracellular pores in vascular endothelial cell membranes.19”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Glassman, P.M., Abuqayyas, L. & Balthasar, J.P. Assessments of antibody biodistribution. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 55 (Suppl 3), S29– S38, (2015). 25707961 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Nonspecific clearance of mAbs also occurs through proteolysis in the liver and the reticuloendothelial system.
“Nonspecific clearance of mAbs also occurs through proteolysis in the liver and the reticuloendothelial system (RES) located in reticular connective tissue.33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Wang, W., Wang, E.Q. & Balthasar, J.P. Monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 84, 548– 558 (2008). 18784655 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Rodents and mini pig have also been explored to further understand the mechanism and variables in mAbs absorption.
“Rodents and mini pig have also been explored to further understand the mechanism and variables in mAbs absorption.22”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Zheng, Y. et al Minipig as a potential translatable model for monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics after intravenous and subcutaneous administration. MAbs. 4, 243– 255 (2012). 22453096 PMC3361660 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Igawa et al. showed that lowering the total pI by 1-2 units resulted in longer half-lives and slower elimination rates.
“Igawa et al. showed that lowering the total pI by 1–2 units resulted in longer half‐lives and slower elimination rates.41”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Igawa, T. et al Reduced elimination of IgG antibodies by engineering the variable region. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 23, 385– 392 (2010). 20159773 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Subcutaneous administration is an established modality for almost all disease indications given its convenience and option of self-administration.
“While the i.v. route may result in higher systemic exposures, s.c. administration is an established modality for almost all disease indications given its convenience and option of self‐administration.18”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Jackisch, C., Muller, V., Maintz, C., Hell, S. & Ataseven, B. Subcutaneous Administration of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 74, 343– 349 (2014). 25076790 PMC4078128 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
At steady state, mAbs generally exhibit a low volume of distribution of 3-8 L, reflecting their confined distribution to the vascular and interstitial spaces because of their size and polarity.
“At steady state, mAbs generally exhibit a low volume of distribution of 3–8 L (Table 3), reflecting their confined distribution to the vascular and interstitial spaces because of their size and polarity.23”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Lobo, E.D., Hansen, R.J. & Balthasar, J.P. Antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. J. Pharm. Sci. 93, 2645– 2668 (2004). 15389672 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The species-invariant time method was reported to have better predictions than simplified allometry for both membrane-bound and soluble targets.
“The species‐invariant time method was reported to have better predictions than simplified allometry for both membrane‐bound and soluble targets.65”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Oitate, M., Nakayama, S., Ito, T., Kurihara, A., Okudaira, N. & Izumi, T. Prediction of human plasma concentration‐time profiles of monoclonal antibodies from monkey data by a species‐invariant time method. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 27, 354– 359 (2012). 22146109 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
PK/PD analysis using unbound evolocumab, unbound PCSK9, and LDL-C data has enabled dose and regimen selection in clinical trials.
“PK/PD analysis using unbound evolocumab, unbound PCSK9, and LDL‐C data has enabled dose and regimen selection in clinical trials37”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Gibbs, J.P. et al Impact of Target‐Mediated Elimination on the Dose and Regimen of Evolocumab, a Human Monoclonal Antibody Against Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9). J. Clin. Pharmacol. 57, 616– 626 (2017). 27861991 PMC5412926 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Jain et al. demonstrated the feasibility of using multiple biophysical metrics to characterize mAbs for drug-like behavior.
“and Jain et al. demonstrated the feasibility of using multiple biophysical metrics to characterize mAbs for drug‐like behavior.58”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Jain, T. et al Biophysical properties of the clinical‐stage antibody landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 944– 949 (2017). 28096333 PMC5293111 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Currently, the majority of bioanalytical methods used to determine mAb concentrations are ligand-based assays such as ELISA.
“Currently, the majority of bioanalytical methods used to determine mAb concentrations are ligand‐based assays (e.g., ELISA).54”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Patton, A., Mullenix, M.C., Swanson, S.J. & Koren, E. An acid dissociation bridging ELISA for detection of antibodies directed against therapeutic proteins in the presence of antigen. J. Immunol. Methods. 304, 189– 195 (2005). 16107258 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Early initiation of PK/PD assessment facilitates understanding of the biology by validating and confirming target engagement.
“Early initiation of PK/PD assessment facilitates understanding of the biology by validating and confirming target engagement.50”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Cook, D. et al Lessons learned from the fate of AstraZeneca's drug pipeline: a five‐dimensional framework. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 13, 419– 431 (2014). 24833294 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Candidate molecules at the early stage of discovery often display a much broader and sometimes undesirable range of PK behavior.
“In reality, candidate molecules at the early stage of discovery often display a much broader and sometimes undesirable range of PK behavior.57”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Hotzel, I. et al A strategy for risk mitigation of antibodies with fast clearance. MAbs. 4, 753– 760 (2012). 23778268 PMC3502242 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
LC-MS technologies have also been utilized for high-throughput quantification of mAbs.
“In addition to ligand‐based assays, LC‐MS technologies have also been utilized for high‐throughput quantification of mAbs.55”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Pai, R. et al Therapeutic Antibody‐Induced Vascular Toxicity Due to Off‐Target Activation of Nitric Oxide in Cynomolgus Monkeys. Toxicol. Sci. 151, 245– 260 (2016). 26917699 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Two general approaches for antibodies with linear PK are commonly used to project mAb PK in humans.
“two general approaches for antibodies with linear PK are commonly used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [63] Wang, J., Iyer, S., Fielder, P.J., Davis, J.D. & Deng, R. Projecting human pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies from nonclinical data: comparative evaluation of prediction approaches in early drug development. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 37, 51– 65 (2016). 25869767 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [64] Ling, J., Zhou, H., Jiao, Q. & Davis, H.M. Interspecies scaling of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: initial look. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 49, 1382– 1402 (2009). 19837907 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [65] Oitate, M., Nakayama, S., Ito, T., Kurihara, A., Okudaira, N. & Izumi, T. Prediction of human plasma concentration‐time profiles of monoclonal antibodies from monkey data by a species‐invariant time method. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 27, 354– 359 (2012). 22146109 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The practice of projecting mAb PK in humans is well established.
“The practice of projecting mAb PK in humans is well established,63, 64, 65, 66, 67”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [63] Wang, J., Iyer, S., Fielder, P.J., Davis, J.D. & Deng, R. Projecting human pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies from nonclinical data: comparative evaluation of prediction approaches in early drug development. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 37, 51– 65 (2016). 25869767 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [64] Ling, J., Zhou, H., Jiao, Q. & Davis, H.M. Interspecies scaling of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: initial look. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 49, 1382– 1402 (2009). 19837907 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [65] Oitate, M., Nakayama, S., Ito, T., Kurihara, A., Okudaira, N. & Izumi, T. Prediction of human plasma concentration‐time profiles of monoclonal antibodies from monkey data by a species‐invariant time method. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 27, 354– 359 (2012). 22146109 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Studies have shown that ADA response in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with anti-TNF immunobiologicals leads to loss of therapeutic benefit after an initial positive response.
“For example, studies have shown that ADA response in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with anti‐TNF immunobiologicals leads to loss of therapeutic benefit after an initial positive response.46”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Prado, M.S., Bendtzen, K. & Andrade, L.E.C. Biological anti‐TNF drugs: Immunogenicity underlying treatment failure and adverse events. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2017. 28772079 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
TMDD modeling has been employed successfully to capture the dynamic interactions between antibody and antigen.
“target‐mediated drug disposition (TMDD) modeling has been employed successfully to capture the dynamic interactions between antibody and antigen.67”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] Dong, J.Q. et al Quantitative prediction of human pharmacokinetics for monoclonal antibodies: retrospective analysis of monkey as a single species for first‐in‐human prediction. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 50, 131– 142 (2011). 21241072 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Dostalek et al. summarized the various in silico, in vitro, and in vivo tools in predicting PK liability of lead candidates.
“A comprehensive review by Dostalek et al. summarized the various in silico, in vitro, and in vivo tools in predicting PK liability of lead candidates.59”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Dostalek, M., Prueksaritanont, T. & Kelley, R.F. Pharmacokinetic de‐risking tools for selection of monoclonal antibody lead candidates. MAbs. 9, 756– 766 (2017). 28463063 PMC5524161 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Jarasch et al. presented a set of comprehensive methods to assess PK developability to help with lead candidate selection.
“The study by Jarasch et al. presented a set of comprehensive methods to assess “PK developability” to help with lead candidate selection51”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Jarasch, A., Koll, H., Regula, J.T., Bader, M., Papadimitriou, A. & Kettenberger, H. Developability assessment during the selection of novel therapeutic antibodies. J. Pharm. Sci. 104, 1885– 1898 (2015). 25821140 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Simplified allometry, which uses data from cynomolgus monkey instead of multiple species, is the most effective allometric scaling approach.
“Among different variations of allometric scaling methods, the “simplified allometry,” which only uses data from cynomolgus monkey instead of multiple species, is the most effective approach given the anatomical, physiological, and biological similarities between cynomolgus monkey and human, including FcRn binding affinity and antibody binding specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
At the investigational new drug enabling stage, integrated PK/PD knowledge along with safety studies serve a critical role in translating preclinical findings to first-in-human dose and regimen selection in the clinic.
“At the investigational new drug (IND) enabling stage, integrated PK/PD knowledge along with safety studies serve a critical role in translating preclinical findings to first‐in‐human dose and regimen selection in the clinic.52, 53”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [52] Tuntland, T. et al Implementation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic strategies in early research phases of drug discovery and development at Novartis Institute of Biomedical Research. Front. Pharmacol. 5, 174 (2014). 25120485 PMC4112793 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [53] Wang, Y., Booth, B., Rahman, A., Kim, G., Huang, S.M. & Zineh, I. Toward greater insights on pharmacokinetics and exposure‐response relationships for therapeutic biologics in oncology drug development. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 101, 582– 584 (2017). 28090657 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The framework of an FIH dose selection for mAbs is based on regulatory guidance.
“The framework of an FIH dose selection for mAbs is based on regulatory guidance.68, 69”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [68] FDA. Guidance for Industry Estimating the Maximum Safe Starting Dose in Initial Clinical Trials for Therapeutics in Adult Healthy Volunteers 2005 [Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm078932.pdf.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [69] EMA. Guideline on Strategies to Identify and Mitigate Risks for First‐in‐Human Clinical Trials with Investigational Medicinal Products 2007 [Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500002988.pdf. PMC6005602 29451320
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Severe mAb-related toxicities in FIH trials between 2000 and 2013 were infrequent.
“Recent surveys on the strategies and outcomes of mAbs tested in FIH trials between 2000 and 2013 found that severe mAb‐related toxicities were infrequent”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [71] Tosi, D. et al Clinical Development Strategies and Outcomes in First‐in‐Human Trials of Monoclonal Antibodies. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 2158– 2165 (2015). 26014300 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [72] Suh, H.Y., Peck, C.C., Yu, K.S. & Lee, H. Determination of the starting dose in the first‐in‐human clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review of papers published between 1990 and 2013. Drug Des Devel Ther. 10, 4005– 4016 (2016). PMC5153257 27994442 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The MABEL approach was used more frequently in recent years.
“The MABEL approach was used more frequently in recent years, reflecting the increasing repertoire of immune modulators and the recognition of translational insufficiency for this family of molecules.75”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] Trivedi, A. et al Clinical Pharmacology and Translational Aspects of Bispecific Antibodies. Clin. Transl. Sci. 10, 147– 162 (2017). 28297195 PMC5421745 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
PBPK modeling has been adapted in mAb scaling.
“Recently, physiologically based PK (PBPK) modeling has been adapted in mAb scaling despite its complexity.29”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Ferl, G.Z., Theil, F.P. & Wong, H. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models of small molecules and therapeutic antibodies: a mini‐review on fundamental concepts and applications. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 37, 75– 92 (2016). 26461173 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The PK/PD model-based approach was gaining acceptance for FIH dose selection.
“while the PK/PD model‐based approach was gaining acceptance.71”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Tosi, D. et al Clinical Development Strategies and Outcomes in First‐in‐Human Trials of Monoclonal Antibodies. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 2158– 2165 (2015). 26014300 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The TGN1412 incident led to the introduction of the MABEL- or MED-based approach.
“in the wake of the TGN1412 incident,73 which led to the introduction of the minimal anticipated biological effect level (MABEL)‐ or minimum effective dose (MED)‐based approach,74”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [73] Suntharalingam, G. et al Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti‐CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 1018– 1028 (2006). 16908486 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [74] EMA. Guideline on Strategies to Identify and Mitigate Risks for First‐in‐Human Clinical Trials with Investigational Medicinal Products 2007. PMC6005602 29451320
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The translatability of human efficacious dose projection depends on confidence in selecting the most relevant PD/efficacy end points and identifying key PK drivers for efficacy.
“The translatability of human efficacious dose projection depends on confidence in selecting the most relevant PD/efficacy end points and identifying key PK drivers (Cmax, Ctrough, or AUC, etc.) for efficacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Exposure–response relationships translate across species.
- Premisecitation
Surveys on FIH dose selection showed that guidance based on NOAEL was the most frequently used method.
“Surveys on FIH dose selection showed that guidance based on no observed adverse effects levels (NOAEL) was the most frequently used method”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Tosi, D. et al Clinical Development Strategies and Outcomes in First‐in‐Human Trials of Monoclonal Antibodies. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 2158– 2165 (2015). 26014300 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The MABEL-based approach could achieve the desired objectives of FIH clinical trials effectively with a more aggressive dose escalation.
“it could achieve the desired objectives of FIH clinical trials effectively with a more aggressive dose escalation.72”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Suh, H.Y., Peck, C.C., Yu, K.S. & Lee, H. Determination of the starting dose in the first‐in‐human clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review of papers published between 1990 and 2013. Drug Des Devel Ther. 10, 4005– 4016 (2016). PMC5153257 27994442 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The recommended FIH dose for TAM-163 based on the MABEL approach was projected to achieve <10% target coverage at Cmax.
“The recommended FIH dose for TAM‐163 based on the MABEL approach was projected to achieve <10% target coverage at Cmax.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Tosi, D. et al Clinical Development Strategies and Outcomes in First‐in‐Human Trials of Monoclonal Antibodies. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 2158– 2165 (2015). 26014300 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The usefulness of toxicity as the criterion to guide dose escalation was limited in FIH trials of mAbs.
“and the usefulness of toxicity as the criterion to guide dose escalation was limited.71, 72”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [71] Tosi, D. et al Clinical Development Strategies and Outcomes in First‐in‐Human Trials of Monoclonal Antibodies. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 2158– 2165 (2015). 26014300 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [72] Suh, H.Y., Peck, C.C., Yu, K.S. & Lee, H. Determination of the starting dose in the first‐in‐human clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review of papers published between 1990 and 2013. Drug Des Devel Ther. 10, 4005– 4016 (2016). PMC5153257 27994442 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A TMDD/PKPD model for TAM-163 identified an efficacy threshold to achieve significant weight gain in monkeys.
“a TMDD/PKPD model was developed for TAM‐163, an agonist antibody targeting tyrosine receptor kinase‐B (TrkB). The integration of exposure, target coverage, and pharmacological activity identified an efficacy threshold to achieve significant weight gain in monkeys.71”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Tosi, D. et al Clinical Development Strategies and Outcomes in First‐in‐Human Trials of Monoclonal Antibodies. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 2158– 2165 (2015). 26014300 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Additional precautions have been taken for molecules of novel pathways or for immune modulators.
“additional precautions have been taken for molecules of novel pathways or for immune modulators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [73] Suntharalingam, G. et al Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti‐CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 1018– 1028 (2006). 16908486 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [74] EMA. Guideline on Strategies to Identify and Mitigate Risks for First‐in‐Human Clinical Trials with Investigational Medicinal Products 2007. PMC6005602 29451320
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The mechanistic insights provided by PK/PD modeling are particularly relevant in applying a MABEL approach.
“The mechanistic insights it provides is particularly relevant in applying a MABEL approach.76”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] EMA. Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first‐in‐human and early clinical trials with investigational medicinal products. 2017. PMC6005602 29451320
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a retrospective population PK/PD analysis on eight targeted and cytotoxic agents with known clinical outcome, greater than 60% tumor growth inhibition in preclinical models at clinically relevant exposures was more likely to lead to responses in the clinic.
“Wong and colleagues showed that greater than 60% tumor growth inhibition in preclinical models at clinically relevant exposures was more likely to lead to responses in the clinic.78”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] Kamath, A.V. et al Preclinical pharmacokinetics of MEHD7945A, a novel EGFR/HER3 dual‐action antibody, and prediction of its human pharmacokinetics and efficacious clinical dose. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 69, 1063– 1069 (2012). 22203367 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A PK-based strategy to select nonclinical doses/regimen in mice for approved drugs can maximize the translatability of efficacy results by identifying 'clinically relevant dose' instead of 'maximally tolerated dose'.
“By identifying “clinically relevant dose” instead of “maximally tolerated dose,” this approach can maximize the translatability of efficacy results”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] Stroh, M. et al Challenges and Opportunities for Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology in Cancer Immunotherapy: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, and Something Blue. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 4, 495– 497 (2015). 26451328 PMC4592528 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Modulation of FcγR binding usually does not change PK profiles.
“Modulation of FcγR binding usually does not change PK profiles.97”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [97] Leabman, M.K., Meng, Y.G., Kelley, R.F., DeForge, L.E., Cowan, K.J. & Iyer, S. Effects of altered FcgammaR binding on antibody pharmacokinetics in cynomolgus monkeys. MAbs. 5, 896– 903 (2013). 24492343 PMC3896603 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Jumbe et al. developed a population-based semi-mechanistic PK/PD model to describe T-DM1 antitumor activity by consolidating the exposure-effect relationship determined across multiple animal models.
“The authors developed a population‐based semi‐mechanistic PK/PD model to describe the T‐DM1 antitumor activity by consolidating the exposure–effect relationship determined across multiple animal models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] Jumbe, N.L. et al Modeling the efficacy of trastuzumab‐DM1, an antibody drug conjugate, in mice. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn. 37, 221– 242 (2010). 20424896 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The anti-CD20 antibodies obinutuzumab and ocrelizumab, with their enhanced FcγR binding affinity, showed greater potency compared to rituximab.
“The anti‐CD20 antibodies, obinutuzumab and ocrelizumab, with their enhanced FcγR binding affinity showed greater potency compared to a first‐generation antibody, rituximab.95”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95] Polito, L., Djemil, A. & Bortolotti, M. Plant Toxin‐Based Immunotoxins for Cancer Therapy: A Short Overview. Biomedicines. 4 (2016). PMC5344252 28536379 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The PK of the anti-Her2/CD3 T cell-dependent bispecific (TDB) antibody in rats demonstrated similar clearance and half-life as trastuzumab.
“the PK of the anti‐Her2/CD3T cell‐dependent bispecific (TDB) antibody in rats demonstrated similar clearance and half‐life as trastuzumab.92”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] Poduslo, J.F., Curran, G.L. & Berg, C.T. Macromolecular permeability across the blood‐nerve and blood‐brain barriers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 5705– 5709 (1994). 8202551 PMC44065 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Frequently, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is determined in the absence of a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for mAbs.
“Frequently, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is determined in the absence of a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for mAbs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] Stroh, M. et al Challenges and Opportunities for Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology in Cancer Immunotherapy: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, and Something Blue. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 4, 495– 497 (2015). 26451328 PMC4592528 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In cases where RP2D is determined without MTD, clinical PK data and projected efficacious dose based on preclinical studies were the main criteria for choosing an RP2D.
“In these cases, clinical PK data and projected efficacious dose based on preclinical studies were the main criteria for choosing an RP2D.80”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] Stroh, M. et al Challenges and Opportunities for Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology in Cancer Immunotherapy: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, and Something Blue. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 4, 495– 497 (2015). 26451328 PMC4592528 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The relative HER2/CD3 affinity is a critical driver for TDB distribution and catabolism in transgenic mouse models.
“Mandikian et al. showed that the relative HER2/CD3 affinity is a critical driver for TDB distribution and catabolism in transgenic mouse models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] Mandikian, D. et al Relative Target Affinities of T‐Cell‐Dependent Bispecific Antibodies Determine Biodistribution in a Solid Tumor Mouse Model. Mol. Cancer Ther. 17, 776– 785 (2018). 29339550 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lindauer et al. utilized physiologically based PK and systems pharmacology approaches combining in vitro binding data, mechanistic tumor growth inhibition models, and drug exposure-time-to-event relationships to successfully identify the lowest effective dose for pembrolizumab.
“Lindauer et al. utilized physiologically based PK and systems pharmacology approaches combining in vitro binding data, mechanistic tumor growth inhibition models, and drug exposure‐time‐to‐event relationships to successfully identify the lowest effective dose for evaluation.82”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] Lindauer, A. et al Translational Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Tumor Growth Inhibition Supports Dose‐Range Selection of the Anti‐PD‐1 Antibody Pembrolizumab. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 6, 11– 20 (2017). 27863176 PMC5270293 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The first approved bsAbs are catumaxomab and blinatumomab.
“This is best exemplified by the first approved bsAbs, catumaxomab (a bsAb binds both CD3 on cytotoxic T cells and EpCAM on human adenocarcinomas,88) and blinatumomab (a CD19 × CD3 targeting bispecific scFv antibody fragment.89)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [88] Linke, R., Klein, A. & Seimetz, D. Catumaxomab: clinical development and future directions. MAbs. 2, 129– 136 (2010). 20190561 PMC2840231 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [89] Bargou, R. et al Tumor regression in cancer patients by very low doses of a T cell‐engaging antibody. Science. 321, 974– 977 (2008). 18703743 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
bsAbs produced from a single host cell through multiple engineering strategies have comparable PK profiles in mice as the in vitro-assembled bispecific IgG.
“Dillon et al., who showed that bsAbs produced from a single host cell through multiple engineering strategies have comparable PK profiles in mice as the in vitro‐assembled bispecific IgG.90”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Dillon, M. et al Efficient production of bispecific IgG of different isotypes and species of origin in single mammalian cells. MAbs. 9, 213– 230 (2017). 27929752 PMC5297516 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The treatment regimen, targeted exposure parameters, and tumoristatic concentration for T-DM1 were derived from the model to support early clinical trial design.
“Subsequently, the treatment regimen, targeted exposure parameters (AUC, Cmax, or time above minimal concentration threshold), and tumoristatic concentration were derived from the model to support early clinical trial design.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] Jumbe, N.L. et al Modeling the efficacy of trastuzumab‐DM1, an antibody drug conjugate, in mice. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn. 37, 221– 242 (2010). 20424896 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Atezolizumab was engineered with a mutation in the Fc domain (N298A) to reduce ADCC and CDC.
“Atezolizumab, an human IgG1 mAb targeting PD‐L1, was engineered with a mutation in the Fc domain (N298A) to reduce ADCC and CDC.96”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] Deng, R. et al Preclinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tissue distribution, and tumor penetration of anti‐PD‐L1 monoclonal antibody, an immune checkpoint inhibitor. MAbs. 8, 593– 603 (2016). 26918260 PMC4966836 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
TfR/BACE1 bsAb constructs drastically improved CNS delivery in both rodents and NHPs.
“By targeting TfR, a transcytosis efficient membrane protein expressed on endothelial cells in brain, these bsAb constructs drastically improved CNS delivery in both rodents and NHPs.94”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94] Yu, Y.J. et al Therapeutic bispecific antibodies cross the blood‐brain barrier in nonhuman primates. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 261ra154 (2014). 25378646 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Gadkar et al. built a PK/PD model using data from bsAbs with a range of affinities that captured the dependence of both systemic and brain exposure on TfR affinity and the subsequent impact on efficacy and safety.
“Gadkar et al. built a PK/PD model using data from bsAbs with a range of affinities that captured the dependence of both systemic and brain exposure on TfR affinity and the subsequent impact on efficacy and safety.87”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] Gadkar, K. et al Mathematical PKPD and safety model of bispecific TfR/BACE1 antibodies for the optimization of antibody uptake in brain. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 101, 53– 61 (2016). 26820920 source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 23
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe maximum plasma concentrations of mAbs are often reached around 3-7 days postdosing, and bioavailability varies between 50-90% following s.c. dosing in humans.
“The maximum plasma concentrations of mAbs are often reached around 3–7 days postdosing and bioavailability varies between 50–90% following s.c. dosing in humans (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationmAbs have limited oral bioavailability, typically less than 1-2%, and are therefore not usually administered orally.
“mAbs have limited oral bioavailability (typically <1–2%)15 and are therefore not usually administered orally.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Renukuntla, J., Vadlapudi, A.D., Patel, A., Boddu, S.H. & Mitra, A.K. Approaches for enhancing oral bioavailability of peptides and proteins. Int. J. Pharm. 447, 75– 93 (2013). 23428883 PMC3680128 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe limited bioavailability of orally administered mAbs is due to limited penetration across the intestinal epithelium and susceptibility to enzymatic degradation by proteases and peptidases in the intestinal lumen.
“The limited bioavailability of orally administered mAbs is due to their limited penetration across the intestinal epithelium16 and susceptibility to enzymatic degradation by proteases and peptidases in the intestinal lumen.17”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Morishita, M. & Peppas, N.A. Is the oral route possible for peptide and protein drug delivery? Drug Discov. Today. 11, 905– 910 (2006). 16997140 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Singh, R., Singh, S. & Lillard, J.W., Jr. Past, present, and future technologies for oral delivery of therapeutic proteins. J. Pharm. Sci. 97, 2497– 2523 (2008). 17918721 PMC4627499 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRudnick et al. showed that when targeting high-density and rapidly internalized antigens such as HER2, a lower-affinity antibody could penetrate tumors more effectively, while an ultrahigh-affinity antibody could limit the distribution of the antibody to tumor as a result of binding site barrier.
“For example, Rudnick et al. showed that when targeting high‐density and rapidly internalized antigens such as HER2, a lower‐affinity antibody could penetrate tumors more effectively, while an ultrahigh‐affinity antibody could limit the distribution of the antibody to tumor as a result of “binding site barrier.”27”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Rudnick, S.I. et al Influence of affinity and antigen internalization on the uptake and penetration of Anti‐HER2 antibodies in solid tumors. Cancer Res. 71, 2250– 2259 (2011). 21406401 PMC3077882 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationYadav et al. demonstrated that modifying Fv charge and hydrophobicity altered mAb PK and s.c. bioavailability; more positive-charged antibody variants showed faster nonspecific clearance than the less positively charged variants or the wildtype.
“Yadav et al. also demonstrated that modifying Fv charge and hydrophobicity altered mAb PK and s.c. bioavailability42: more positive‐charged antibody variants showed faster nonspecific clearance than the less positively charged variants or the wildtype.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Bumbaca Yadav, D. et al Evaluating the Use of Antibody Variable Region (Fv) Charge as a Risk Assessment Tool for Predicting Typical Cynomolgus Monkey Pharmacokinetics. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 29732– 29741 (2015). 26491012 PMC4705991 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe FcRn-mediated recycling process is most likely responsible for the observed relatively long half-life of mAbs of 11-30 days in humans, which is similar to the half-life of endogenous IgG (~21 days).
“This recycling process is most likely responsible for the observed relatively long half‐life of mAbs of 11–30 days in humans (Table 3), which is similar to the half‐life of endogenous IgG (∼21 days).31”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Dirks, N.L. & Meibohm, B. Population pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 49, 633– 659 (2010). 20818831 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGibbs et al. demonstrated the critical importance of characterizing target-mediated clearance in selecting an optimal dosing regimen for the PCSK9 antibody evolocumab; their TMDD PK/PD modeling suggested that doubling the dose and extending the dosing interval from biweekly to monthly did not adequately maintain the reduction in LDL-C, and a higher dose was required to maintain stable LDL-C levels
“For example, Gibbs et al. demonstrated the critical importance of characterizing target‐mediated clearance in selecting an optimal dosing regimen for protein convertase substilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) antibody evolucumab.37 Their target‐mediated drug disposition PK/PD modeling suggested that doubling the dose and extending the dosing interval from biweekly to monthly did not adequately maintain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Gibbs, J.P. et al Impact of Target‐Mediated Elimination on the Dose and Regimen of Evolocumab, a Human Monoclonal Antibody Against Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9). J. Clin. Pharmacol. 57, 616– 626 (2017). 27861991 PMC5412926 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTarget-mediated clearance refers to the elimination of mAbs through antigen-specific interactions; after mAbs bind a specific antigen, they may be internalized and catabolized through lysosomal degradation as an antibody-antigen complex.
“Target‐mediated clearance refers to the elimination of mAbs through its antigen‐specific interactions. After mAbs bind to a specific antigen (soluble or membrane bound) they may be internalized and catabolized through lysosomal degradation as an antibody–antigen complex.35”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Mellman, I. & Plutner, H. Internalization and degradation of macrophage Fc receptors bound to polyvalent immune complexes. J. Cell Biol. 98, 1170– 1177 (1984). 6715404 PMC2113248 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere are efforts aimed at predicting immunogenicity using in silico and in vitro tools.
“Despite these challenges, there are efforts aimed at predicting immunogenicity using in silico and in vitro tools.49”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] De Groot, A.S., McMurry, J. & Moise, L. Prediction of immunogenicity: in silico paradigms, ex vivo and in vivo correlates. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 8, 620– 626 (2008). 18775515 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing simplified allometry, the volume of distribution scales proportionally with body weight and clearance often follows an exponent between 0.8-0.9 along with body weight scaling.
“Using this method, the volume of distribution scales proportionally with body weight and clearance often follows an exponent between 0.8–0.9 along with body weight scaling.66”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] Deng, R., Iyer, S., Theil, F.P., Mortensen, D.L., Fielder, P.J. & Prabhu, S. Projecting human pharmacokinetics of therapeutic antibodies from nonclinical data: what have we learned? MAbs. 3, 61– 66 (2011). 20962582 PMC3038012 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSequence alone is not a reliable predictor of immunogenicity; determinants of immunogenicity include product characteristics such as oxidation and deamidation sites, as well as target biology, patient population, dosing routes, and regimen.
“However, sequence alone is not a reliable predictor of immunogenicity. Determinants of immunogenicity include product characteristics such as oxidation and deamidation sites, as well as target biology, patient population, dosing routes, and regimen.47”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Singh, S.K. Impact of product‐related factors on immunogenicity of biotherapeutics. J. Pharm. Sci. 100, 354– 387 (2011). 20740683 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationADA response may result in the formation of immune complexes with the mAbs; immune complexes are more likely cleared via FcγR-mediated endocytosis at a different rate than mAb alone and accelerate (or less frequently delay) the overall mAb clearance.
“ADA response may result in the formation of immune complexes with the mAbs. Varying in size and structure, immune complexes are more likely cleared via FcγR‐mediated endocytosis at a different rate than mAb alone (faster or sometimes slower) and accelerate (or less frequently delay) the overall mAb clearance.45”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Bendtzen, K. Immunogenicity of Anti‐TNF‐alpha Biotherapies: II. Clinical Relevance of Methods Used for Anti‐Drug Antibody Detection. Front Immunol. 6, 109 (2015). 25904911 PMC4389574 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationImmunogenicity in preclinical species cannot predict the incidence of human ADAs but may have utility in characterizing the consequences of potential ADAs.
“Immunogenicity in preclinical species cannot predict the incidence of human ADAs but may have utility in characterizing the consequences of potential ADAs.48”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] FDA. Guidance for Industry ‐ Immunogenicity Assessment for Therapeutic Protein Products 2014 [Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm338856.pdf.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTherapeutic mAbs with high terminal mannose glycans exhibit fast elimination from systemic circulation and lower efficacy.
“For example, therapeutic mAbs with high terminal mannose glycans exhibit fast elimination from systemic circulation and lower efficacy.43, 44”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [43] Goetze, A.M. et al High‐mannose glycans on the Fc region of therapeutic IgG antibodies increase serum clearance in humans. Glycobiology. 21, 949– 959 (2011). 21421994 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [44] Kanda, Y. et al Comparison of biological activity among nonfucosylated therapeutic IgG1 antibodies with three different N‐linked Fc oligosaccharides: the high‐mannose, hybrid, and complex types. Glycobiology. 17, 104– 118 (2007). 17012310 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnce in clinical development, clinical pharmacology studies can identify covariates and potential sources of intersubject variability, establish exposure-response relationships in patients, and aid in development of a dosing regimen.
“Once in clinical development, clinical pharmacology studies can identify the covariates and potential sources of intersubject variability; establish exposure–response relationships in patients, and aid in development of a dosing regimen.40”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Gill, K.L., Machavaram, K.K., Rose, R.H. & Chetty, M. Potential Sources of Inter‐Subject Variability in Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 55, 789– 805 (2016). 26818483 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe specific choice for FIH dose depends on several factors: species cross-reactivity, relevance of animal models, steepness of dose response, PK/PD relationship, nature of toxicity, and precedence of molecules in similar pathways.
“The specific choice for FIH dose depends on several factors: species cross‐reactivity, relevance of animal models, steepness of dose response, PK/PD relationship, nature of toxicity such as predictability, reversibility, tolerability, manageability, and the precedence of molecules in similar pathways.70”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] Chapman, K., Pullen, N., Graham, M. & Ragan, I. Preclinical safety testing of monoclonal antibodies: the significance of species relevance. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 6, 120– 126 (2007). 17268483 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationApproximately 58% of studies used NHPs only and nearly 80% used both NHPs and rodents to determine FIH dose.
“Based on literature, approximately 58% of studies used NHPs only and nearly 80% used both NHPs and rodents to determine FiH dose.71”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Tosi, D. et al Clinical Development Strategies and Outcomes in First‐in‐Human Trials of Monoclonal Antibodies. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 2158– 2165 (2015). 26014300 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe MABEL-based approach is the most conservative approach leading to a lower starting dose.
“While the MABEL‐based approach is the most conservative approach leading to a lower starting dose”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Suh, H.Y., Peck, C.C., Yu, K.S. & Lee, H. Determination of the starting dose in the first‐in‐human clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review of papers published between 1990 and 2013. Drug Des Devel Ther. 10, 4005– 4016 (2016). PMC5153257 27994442 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPBPK modeling can capture both drug-related and system-related properties across species and add additional insights in translational projection.
“By integrating physiological parameters, in vitro and in vivo PK data into anatomically and physiologically meaningful compartments, PBPK modeling can capture both drug‐related and system‐related properties across species and add additional insights in translational projection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationClinical pharmacology along with pharmacometric approaches help identify patient-specific covariates, assess the source of variability, explore dose/exposure response relationships, dissect the role of predictive and prognostic biomarkers, and ultimately, establish the dose and dosing regimen for a given treatment.
“Clinical pharmacology along with pharmacometric approaches help identify patient‐specific covariates, assess the source of variability, explore dose/exposure response relationships, dissect the role of predictive and prognostic biomarkers, and ultimately, establish the dose and dosing regimen for a given treatment.83”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] Vicini, P. & Roskos, L.K. Clinical Pharmacology: a Discipline at the Nexus Between Translational Science and Precision Medicine: Commentary on “Enhancing Value of Clinical Pharmacodynamics in Oncology Drug Development: An Alliance Between Quantitative Pharmacology and Translational Science”. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016. 27984659
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe majority of novel checkpoint inhibitors in cancer immunotherapy exhibit heterogeneous tumor responses and lack predictive biomarkers.
“since the majority of these therapeutics exhibit heterogeneous tumor responses and lack predictive biomarkers.81”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] Garrido, M.J., Berraondo, P. & Troconiz, I.F. Commentary on Pharmacometrics for Immunotherapy. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 6, 8– 10 (2017). 27997736 PMC5270298 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOne of the most active areas of bsAbs application is in the field of cancer immunotherapy.
“One of the most active areas of bsAbs application is in the field of cancer immunotherapy.85, 86, 87”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [85] Chames, P. & Baty, D. Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy: the light at the end of the tunnel? MAbs. 1, 539– 547 (2009). 20073127 PMC2791310 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [86] Muller, D. & Kontermann, R.E. Bispecific antibodies for cancer immunotherapy: Current perspectives. BioDrugs. 24, 89– 98 (2010). 20199124 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [87] Gadkar, K. et al Mathematical PKPD and safety model of bispecific TfR/BACE1 antibodies for the optimization of antibody uptake in brain. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 101, 53– 61 (2016). 26820920 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCurrently, there are over 60 different bsAbs formats with variations in modular structure, size, affinity/avidity, PK behavior, and intended clinical application.
“Currently, there are over 60 different bsAbs formats with variations in modular structure, size, affinity/avidity, PK behavior, and intended clinical application.84”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] Spiess, C., Zhai, Q. & Carter, P.J. Alternative molecular formats and therapeutic applications for bispecific antibodies. Mol. Immunol. 67 (2 Pt A), 95– 106 (2015). 25637431 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationM252Y/S254T/T256E (YTE) mutations on motavizumab led to a 10-fold increase in affinity for human FcRn at pH 6.0 with no change in affinity at pH 7.4 and significantly increased its half-life in monkeys and in healthy adult humans.
“M252Y/S254T/T256E (YTE) mutations on motavizumab led to a 10‐fold increase in affinity for human FcRn at pH 6.0 with no change in affinity at pH 7.4 and significantly increased its half‐life in monkeys and in healthy adult humans.32”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Robbie, G.J. et al A novel investigational Fc‐modified humanized monoclonal antibody, motavizumab‐YTE, has an extended half‐life in healthy adults. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 6147– 6153 (2013). 24080653 PMC3837853 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationmAbs exhibit limited distribution to the brain, with mAb concentrations determined to be 0.1-0.2% and 0.02% of the steady-state circulating mAb concentration in rodents and cynomolgus monkey, respectively.
“mAbs exhibit limited distribution to the brain, and mAb concentrations was determined to be 0.1–0.2 % and 0.02 % of the steady‐state circulating mAb concentration in rodents and cynomolgus monkey, respectively.92, 93”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [92] Poduslo, J.F., Curran, G.L. & Berg, C.T. Macromolecular permeability across the blood‐nerve and blood‐brain barriers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 5705– 5709 (1994). 8202551 PMC44065 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [93] Yadav, D.B. et al Widespread brain distribution and activity following i.c.v. infusion of anti‐beta‐secretase (BACE1) in nonhuman primates. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017. PMC5659992 28859225 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is a strong correlation between CD3 affinity and distribution to T-cell-rich tissues, with higher CD3 affinity reducing systemic exposure and shifting TDB distribution away from tumor to T cell-containing tissues.
“They also showed that there was a strong correlation between CD3 affinity and distribution to T‐cell‐rich tissues, with higher CD3 affinity reducing systemic exposure and shifting TDB distribution away from tumor to T cell‐containing tissues91”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] Mandikian, D. et al Relative Target Affinities of T‐Cell‐Dependent Bispecific Antibodies Determine Biodistribution in a Solid Tumor Mouse Model. Mol. Cancer Ther. 17, 776– 785 (2018). 29339550 source
Not checked in the free run.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Free mAb is the driver for biological activities.
“Free mAb is often the most desirable analyte since it is assumed to be the driver for biological activities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The FcγR-mediated elimination pathway is not saturable for mAb therapeutics.
“The FcγR‐mediated elimination pathway is not saturable for mAbs therapeutics; therefore, FcγR binding alone is not expected to impact mAb PK when nonspecific clearance is dominant.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Target-mediated clearance decreases with saturation of the target.
“Target‐mediated clearance decreases with the saturation of the target, which in turn is dependent on dose.”
The paper relies on this without support.
mAbs are mainly metabolized and eliminated through proteolytic degradation that results in smaller peptides and amino acids.
“Instead, mAbs are mainly metabolized and eliminated through proteolytic degradation that results in smaller peptides and amino acids.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Systemically administered mAbs exhibit biphasic PK profiles in circulation, with a relatively fast distribution phase followed by a slower elimination phase.
“Typically, systemically administered mAbs exhibit biphasic PK profiles in circulation, i.e., a relatively fast distribution phase followed by a slower elimination phase.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The administration routes of choice for mAbs are intravenous, subcutaneous, and occasionally intramuscular.
“The administration routes of choice for mAbs are intravenous (i.v.), subcutaneous (s.c.), and occasionally intramuscular (i.m.).”
The paper relies on this without support.
FcRn binds to the Fc region of IgG in a pH-dependent manner, strong at acidic pH 6.0–6.5 and weak at neutral pH 7.0–7.5.
“FcRn binds to the Fc region of the IgG in a pH‐dependent manner, i.e., the binding between IgG and FcRn is strong at acidic pH of 6.0–6.5 and weak at neutral pH of 7.0–7.5.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Dose-normalized drug concentrations in preclinical species are equivalent to humans.
“based on the assumption that the dose‐normalized drug concentrations in preclinical species are equivalent to humans”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Exposure–response relationships translate across species.
“exposure–response relationships translate across species”
The authors state this as an assumption.
mAb PK is predictable in humans at a relevant dose range.
“mAb PK is predictable in humans at a relevant dose range”
The paper relies on this without support.
A high degree of homology between epitopes often signals the likelihood of crossreactivity for a given mAb.
“A high degree of homology between epitopes often signals the likelihood of crossreactivity for a given mAb.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not unusual to have lead candidates that show limited binding to rodent and NHPs are the only relevant species that support toxicity or PD studies.
“It is not unusual to have lead candidates that show limited binding to rodent and NHPs are the only relevant species that support toxicity or PD studies.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Isoelectric point, viscosity, immunogenicity, non-specificity, aggregation, and stability are factors related to clinical PK clearance rate.
“Isoelectric point (pI), viscosity, immunogenicity, non-specificity, aggregation, and stability are factors related to clinical PK clearance rate [34].”
From Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Overlapping first-in-human study categories exceed 100%
MinorStudies using NHPs only cannot also use both NHPs and rodents. The stated shares-approximately 58% and nearly 80%-therefore cannot both describe the same set of studies.
“approximately 58% of studies used NHPs only”
“nearly 80% used both NHPs and rodents to determine FiH dose.”
Reported clearance range excludes a listed mAb
MinorTable 1 says recently marketed mAbs have clearance values of 90-560 mL/day, but Table 3 lists avelumab at 590 mL/day.
“Recently marketed mAbs exhibit clearance values between 90–560 mL/ day and half‐lives between 11–30 days (Table 3)”
“| Avelumab (Bavencio) Merck | PD‐1 blocker | Merkel cell carcinoma | i.v. infusion (60 minutes) 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks | 590 | 4.72 | 6.1 | | 4.1 |”
Cites
Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity
Köhler, G., & Milstein, C. (1975) · Nature · doi:10.1038/256495a0 · Cited by 17,200 · see citing works
FcRn: the neonatal Fc receptor comes of age
Roopenian, D. C., & Akilesh, S. (2007) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2155 · Cited by 2,346 · see citing works
Cytokine Storm in a Phase 1 Trial of the Anti-CD28 Monoclonal Antibody TGN1412
Suntharalingam, G., Perry, M. R., Ward, S., Brett, S. J., Castello-Cortes, A., Brunner, M. D., & Panoskaltsis, N. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa063842 · Cited by 2,164 · see citing works
Lessons learned from the fate of AstraZeneca's drug pipeline: a five-dimensional framework
Cook, D., Brown, D., Alexander, R., March, R., Morgan, P., Satterthwaite, G., & Pangalos, M. N. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4309 · Cited by 1,347 · see citing works
Tumor Regression in Cancer Patients by Very Low Doses of a T Cell–Engaging Antibody
Bargou, R., Leo, E., Zugmaier, G., Klinger, M., Goebeler, M., Knop, S., Noppeney, R., Viardot, A., Hess, G., Schuler, M., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158545 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Wang, W., Wang, E., & Balthasar, J. (2008) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.170 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
Antibody Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Lobo, E. D., Hansen, R. J., & Balthasar, J. P. (2004) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20178 · Cited by 909 · see citing works
Therapeutic antibodies for autoimmunity and inflammation
Chan, A. C., & Carter, P. J. (2010) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2761 · Cited by 840 · see citing works
Building better monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics
Weiner, G. J. (2015) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3930 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Approaches for enhancing oral bioavailability of peptides and proteins
Renukuntla, J., Vadlapudi, A. D., Patel, A., Boddu, S. H. S., & Mitra, A. K. (2013) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.02.030 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
Properties of Human IgG1s Engineered for Enhanced Binding to the Neonatal Fc Receptor (FcRn)
Dall’Acqua, W. F., Kiener, P. A., & Wu, H. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m604292200 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
Biophysical properties of the clinical-stage antibody landscape
Jain, T., Sun, T., Durand, S., Hall, A., Houston, N. R., Nett, J. H., Sharkey, B., Bobrowicz, B., Caffry, I., Yu, Y., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1616408114 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Alternative molecular formats and therapeutic applications for bispecific antibodies
Spiess, C., Zhai, Q., & Carter, P. J. (2015) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2015.01.003 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Liu, J. K. H. (2014) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2014.09.001 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Is the oral route possible for peptide and protein drug delivery?
Morishita, M., & Peppas, N. A. (2006) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2006.08.005 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Population Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies
Dirks, N. L., & Meibohm, B. (2010) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/11535960-000000000-00000 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Goetze, A. M., Liu, Y. D., Zhang, Z., Shah, B., Lee, E., Bondarenko, P. V., & Flynn, G. C. (2011) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/cwr027 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Effects of Charge on Antibody Tissue Distribution and Pharmacokinetics
Boswell, C. A., Tesar, D. B., Mukhyala, K., Theil, F.-P., Fielder, P. J., & Khawli, L. A. (2010) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/bc100261d · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Mechanistic Determinants of Biotherapeutics Absorption Following SC Administration
Richter, W. F., Bhansali, S. G., & Morris, M. E. (2012) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-012-9367-0 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Macromolecular permeability across the blood-nerve and blood-brain barriers.
Poduslo, J. F., Curran, G. L., & Berg, C. T. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.12.5705 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Kanda, Y., Yamada, T., Mori, K., Okazaki, A., Inoue, M., Kitajima-Miyama, K., Kuni-Kamochi, R., Nakano, R., Yano, K., Kakita, S., et al. (2007) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/cwl057 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Therapeutic bispecific antibodies cross the blood-brain barrier in nonhuman primates
Yu, Y. J., Atwal, J. K., Zhang, Y., Tong, R. K., Wildsmith, K. R., Tan, C., Bien-Ly, N., Hersom, M., Maloney, J. A., Meilandt, W. J., et al. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3009835 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Robbie, G. J., Criste, R., Dall'Acqua, W. F., Jensen, K., Patel, N. K., Losonsky, G. A., & Griffin, M. P. (2013) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01285-13 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Rudnick, S. I., Lou, J., Shaller, C. C., Tang, Y., Klein-Szanto, A. J. P., Weiner, L. M., Marks, J. D., & Adams, G. P. (2011) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-2277 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Impact of Product-Related Factors on Immunogenicity of Biotherapeutics
Singh, S. K. (2011) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.22276 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Drugs for Autoimmune Inflammatory Diseases: From Small Molecule Compounds to Anti-TNF Biologics
Li, P., Zheng, Y., & Chen, X. (2017) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00460 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy: The light at the end of the tunnel?
Chames, P., & Baty, D. (2009) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.1.6.10015 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Deng, R., Iyer, S., Theil, F.-P., Mortensen, D. L., Fielder, P. J., & Prabhu, S. (2011) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.3.1.13799 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Catumaxomab: Clinical development and future directions
Linke, R., Klein, A., & Seimetz, D. (2010) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.2.2.11221 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Reduced elimination of IgG antibodies by engineering the variable region
Igawa, T., Tsunoda, H., Tachibana, T., Maeda, A., Mimoto, F., Moriyama, C., Nanami, M., Sekimori, Y., Nabuchi, Y., Aso, Y., et al. (2010) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzq009 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Shah, D. K., & Betts, A. M. (2013) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.23684 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Sharma, V. K., Patapoff, T. W., Kabakoff, B., Pai, S., Hilario, E., Zhang, B., Li, C., Borisov, O., Kelley, R. F., Chorny, I., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1421779112 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Internalization and degradation of macrophage Fc receptors bound to polyvalent immune complexes.
Mellman, I., & Plutner, H. (1984) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.98.4.1170 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies: historical and future perspectives
Lim, S. H., Beers, S. A., French, R. R., Johnson, P., Glennie, M. J., & Cragg, M. S. (2009) · Haematologica · doi:10.3324/haematol.2008.001628 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
A strategy for risk mitigation of antibodies with fast clearance
Hötzel, I., Theil, F.-P., Bernstein, L. J., Prabhu, S., Deng, R., Quintana, L., Lutman, J., Sibia, R., Chan, P., Bumbaca, D., et al. (2012) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.22189 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Reichert, J. M. (2016) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2016.1269580 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Developability Assessment During the Selection of Novel Therapeutic Antibodies
Jarasch, A., Koll, H., Regula, J. T., Bader, M., Papadimitriou, A., & Kettenberger, H. (2015) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.24430 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Tuntland, T., Ethell, B., Kosaka, T., Blasco, F., Zang, R. X., Jain, M., Gould, T., & Hoffmaster, K. (2014) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2014.00174 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
The neonatal Fc receptor, FcRn, as a target for drug delivery and therapy
Sockolosky, J. T., & Szoka, F. C. (2015) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.02.005 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Affinity and Avidity in Antibody-Based Tumor Targeting
Rudnick, S. I., & Adams, G. P. (2009) · Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals · doi:10.1089/cbr.2009.0627 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Neonatal Fc receptor and IgG-based therapeutics
Kuo, T. T., & Aveson, V. G. (2011) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.3.5.16983 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Almagro, J. C., & Fransson, J. (2008) · PubMed · doi:10.2741/2786 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Charge-mediated influence of the antibody variable domain on FcRn-dependent pharmacokinetics
Schoch, A., Kettenberger, H., Mundigl, O., Winter, G., Engert, J., Heinrich, J., & Emrich, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1408766112 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Patton, A., Mullenix, M. C., Swanson, S. J., & Koren, E. (2005) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jim.2005.06.014 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Deng, R., Bumbaca, D., Pastuskovas, C. V., Boswell, C. A., West, D., Cowan, K. J., Chiu, H., McBride, J., Johnson, C., Xin, Y., et al. (2016) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1136043 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Past, Present, and Future Technologies for Oral Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins
Singh, R., Singh, S., & Lillard, J. W. (2008) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.21183 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Immunology beats cancer: a blueprint for successful translation
Pardoll, D. M. (2012) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.2392 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
van Gerven, J., & Bonelli, M. (2018) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.13550 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Antitumor Efficacy of a Bispecific Antibody That Targets HER2 and Activates T Cells
Junttila, T. T., Li, J., Johnston, J., Hristopoulos, M. L., Clark, R. A., Ellerman, D. A., Wang, B.-E., Li, Y., Mathieu, M. A., Li, G., et al. (2014) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-3622-t · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Dong, J. Q., Salinger, D. H., Endres, C. J., Gibbs, J. P., Hsu, C.-P., Stouch, B. J., Hurh, E., & Gibbs, M. A. (2011) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/11537430-000000000-00000 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Mandikian, D., Takahashi, N., Lo, A. A., Li, J., Eastham-Anderson, J., Slaga, D., Ho, J., Hristopoulos, M., Clark, R., Totpal, K., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-0657 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationZheng, Y., Tesar, D. B., Benincosa, L., Birnböck, H., Boswell, C. A., Bumbaca, D., Cowan, K. J., Danilenko, D. M., Daugherty, A. L., Fielder, P. J., et al. (2012) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.4.2.19387 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Lessons for the clinic from rituximab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Golay, J., Semenzato, G., Rambaldi, A., Foà, R., Gaidano, G., Gamba, E., Pane, F., Pinto, A., Specchia, G., Zaja, F., et al. (2013) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.26008 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Interspecies Scaling of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies: Initial Look
Ling, J., Zhou, H., Jiao, Q., & Davis, H. M. (2009) · The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1177/0091270009337134 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Bispecific Antibodies for Cancer Immunotherapy: Current Perspectives
Müller, D., & Kontermann, R. E. (2010) · BioDrugs · doi:10.2165/11530960-000000000-00000 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Analytical FcRn affinity chromatography for functional characterization of monoclonal antibodies
Schlothauer, T., Rueger, P., Stracke, J. O., Hertenberger, H., Fingas, F., Kling, L., Emrich, T., Drabner, G., Seeber, S., Auer, J., et al. (2013) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.24981 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Deng, R., Jin, F., Prabhu, S., & Iyer, S. (2012) · Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · doi:10.1517/17425255.2012.643868 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Preclinical safety testing of monoclonal antibodies: the significance of species relevance
Chapman, K., Pullen, N., Graham, M., & Ragan, I. (2007) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2242 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Lindauer, A., Valiathan, C., Mehta, K., Sriram, V, de Greef, R., Elassaiss-Schaap, J., & de Alwis, D. (2017) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12130 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Modeling the efficacy of trastuzumab-DM1, an antibody drug conjugate, in mice
Jumbe, N. L., Xin, Y., Leipold, D. D., Crocker, L., Dugger, D., Mai, E., Sliwkowski, M. X., Fielder, P. J., & Tibbitts, J. (2010) · Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics · doi:10.1007/s10928-010-9156-2 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Physiochemical and Biochemical Factors Influencing the Pharmacokinetics of Antibody Therapeutics
Bumbaca, D., Boswell, C. A., Fielder, P. J., & Khawli, L. A. (2012) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-012-9369-y · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Mould, D. R., Baumann, A., Kuhlmann, J., Keating, M. J., Weitman, S., Hillmen, P., Brettman, L. R., Reif, S., & Bonate, P. L. (2007) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02914.x · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Effects of altered FcγR binding on antibody pharmacokinetics in cynomolgus monkeys
Leabman, M. K., Meng, Y. G., Kelley, R. F., DeForge, L. E., Cowan, K. J., & Iyer, S. (2013) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.26436 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Prediction of immunogenicity: in silico paradigms, ex vivo and in vivo correlates
DEGROOT, A., MCMURRY, J., & MOISE, L. (2008) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2008.08.002 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Cruse, J. M., & Lewis, R. E. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-11196-3 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Coming-of-Age of Antibodies in Cancer Therapeutics
Ayyar, B. V., Arora, S., & O’Kennedy, R. J. (2016) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2016.09.005 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Subcutaneous Administration of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology
Jackisch, C., Müller, V., Maintz, C., Hell, S., & Ataseven, B. (2014) · Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1368173 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Bumbaca Yadav, D., Sharma, V. K., Boswell, C. A., Hotzel, I., Tesar, D., Shang, Y., Ying, Y., Fischer, S. K., Grogan, J. L., Chiang, E. Y., et al. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.692434 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Potential Sources of Inter-Subject Variability in Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics
Gill, K. L., Machavaram, K. K., Rose, R. H., & Chetty, M. (2016) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.1007/s40262-015-0361-4 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Clinical Pharmacology and Translational Aspects of Bispecific Antibodies
Trivedi, A., Stienen, S., Zhu, M., Li, H., Yuraszeck, T., Gibbs, J., Heath, T., Loberg, R., & Kasichayanula, S. (2017) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12459 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Plant Toxin-Based Immunotoxins for Cancer Therapy: A Short Overview
Polito, L., Djemil, A., & Bortolotti, M. (2016) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines4020012 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Dillon, M., Yin, Y., Zhou, J., McCarty, L., Ellerman, D., Slaga, D., Junttila, T. T., Han, G., Sandoval, W., Ovacik, M. A., et al. (2017) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2016.1267089 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationBendtzen, K. (2015) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00109 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Wang, J., Iyer, S., Fielder, P. J., Davis, J. D., & Deng, R. (2016) · Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition · doi:10.1002/bdd.1952 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Biological anti-TNF drugs: immunogenicity underlying treatment failure and adverse events
Prado, M. S., Bendtzen, K., & Andrade, L. E. C. (2017) · Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · doi:10.1080/17425255.2017.1360280 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Gupta, P., Kamath, A. V., Park, S., Chiu, H. H., Lutman, J., Maia, M., Tan, M., Xu, M., Swem, L. R., & Deng, R. (2016) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2016.1167294 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Ferl, G. Z., Theil, F., & Wong, H. (2016) · Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition · doi:10.1002/bdd.1994 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Human antibody libraries: A race to engineer and explore a larger diversity
Mondon, P. (2007) · Frontiers in bioscience · doi:10.2741/2749 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Zhou, L., Hoofring, S. A., Wu, Y. C., Vu, T. C., Ma, P., Swanson, S. J., Chirmule, N. B., & Starcevic, M. (2012) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-012-9408-8 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Datta-Mannan, A., Witcher, D. R., Lu, J., & Wroblewski, V. J. (2012) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.4.2.19364 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Gadkar, K., Yadav, D. B., Zuchero, J. Y., Couch, J. A., Kanodia, J., Kenrick, M. K., Atwal, J. K., Dennis, M. S., Prabhu, S., Watts, R. J., et al. (2016) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.01.009 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Suh, H. Y., Peck, C., Yu, K.-S., & Lee, H. (2016) · Drug Design, Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s121520 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Yadav, D. B., Maloney, J. A., Wildsmith, K. R., Fuji, R. N., Meilandt, W. J., Solanoy, H., Lu, Y., Peng, K., Wilson, B., Chan, P., et al. (2017) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.14021 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Booth, B., Rahman, A., Kim, G., Huang, S., & Zineh, I. (2017) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.628 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Kenny, J. R., Liu, M. M., Chow, A. T., Earp, J. C., Evers, R., Slatter, J. G., Wang, D. D., Zhang, L., & Zhou, H. (2013) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-013-9495-1 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Pharmacokinetic de-risking tools for selection of monoclonal antibody lead candidates
Dostalek, M., Prueksaritanont, T., & Kelley, R. F. (2017) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2017.1323160 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Assessments of antibody biodistribution
Glassman, P. M., Abuqayyas, L., & Balthasar, J. P. (2015) · The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/jcph.365 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Gibbs, J. P., Doshi, S., Kuchimanchi, M., Grover, A., Emery, M. G., Dodds, M. G., Gibbs, M. A., Somaratne, R., Wasserman, S. M., & Blom, D. (2017) · The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/jcph.840 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Kamath, A. V., Lu, D., Gupta, P., Jin, D., Xiang, H., Wong, A., Leddy, C., Crocker, L., Schaefer, G., Sliwkowski, M. X., et al. (2012) · Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00280-011-1806-6 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Oitate, M., Nakayama, S., Ito, T., Kurihara, A., Okudaira, N., & Izumi, T. (2012) · Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2133/dmpk.dmpk-11-sh-059 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Clinical Development Strategies and Outcomes in First-in-Human Trials of Monoclonal Antibodies
Tosi, D., Laghzali, Y., Vinches, M., Alexandre, M., Homicsko, K., Fasolo, A., Del Conte, G., Durigova, A., Hayaoui, N., Gourgou, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.58.1082 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Colbert, A., Umble-Romero, A., Prokop, S. P., Xu, R., Gibbs, J. P., & Pederson, S. M. (2014) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.28719 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Stroh, M., Carlile, D., Li, C.-C., Wagg, J., Ribba, B., Ramanujan, S., Jin, J., Xu, J., Charoin, J.-E., Xhu, Z.-X., et al. (2015) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12014 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Pai, R., Ma, N., Connor, A. V., Danilenko, D. M., Tarrant, J. M., Salvail, D., Wong, L., Hartley, D. P., Misner, D., Stefanich, E., et al. (2016) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfw037 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Commentary on Pharmacometrics for Immunotherapy
Garrido, M., Berraondo, P., & Trocóniz, I. (2017) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12162 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Vicini, P., & Roskos, L. (2016) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.596 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Janeway C.Immunobiology 5th Edition Garland Publishing;2001.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
De novo design of modular and tunable protein biosensors
Quijano-Rubio, A., Yeh, H.-W., Park, J., Lee, H., Langan, R. A., Boyken, S. E., Lajoie, M. J., Cao, L., Chow, C. M., Miranda, M. C., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03258-z · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development
Kim, J., McFee, M., Fang, Q., Abdin, O., & Kim, P. M. (2023) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2022.12.005 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ovacik, M., & Lin, K.
- Affiliations
- Genentech (US)
- NGM Biopharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lin, Kedan
- ORCID
- Lin, Kedan
- Venue
- Clinical and Translational Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-08-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 540-552
- ISSN
- 1752-8054 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-8062
- PMC
- PMC6226118
- OpenAlex
- W2806708871
- Semantic Scholar
- 45578fb88c0eef04cdfc82cd1d5a3b4947c25e9f
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 11.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical and Translational Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
- Keywords
- monoclonal antibodies, antibody pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, early drug development, antibody development
- MeSH terms
- Drug Development, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Biological Availability, Clinical Trials as Topic, Decision Making, Half-Life, Humans, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Models, Biological, Tissue Distribution, History, 21st Century, Molecular Targeted Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review