Cited by 34Microbial Fuel Cells and BioremediationElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related Materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hydrogen production with polyaniline/multi‐walled carbon nanotube cathode catalysts in microbial electrolysis cells

Yang, Qian, Jiang, Yangyue, Xu, Yuan, Qiu, Yu, Chen, Yingwen, Zhu, Shemin, Shen, Shubao·2015·Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology

Abstract

BACKGROUND Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) have been considered a promising approach for hydrogen production from renewable biomass. The optimization of the cathode catalyst is important in the study of MECs. Based on the hydrogen production rate (Q) and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal as the evaluation standards, this research focused on the use of the polyaniline (PANI)/multi‐walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) composites as the cathode catalysts to replace platinum (Pt) in a single‐chamber membrane‐free MEC. RESULTS Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and linear sweep voltammograms (LSV) were used to evaluate the morphology and electrocatalytic activity of the cathodes. At an applied voltage of 1.0 V, the MEC with 75% wt PANI/MWCNTs cathodes achieved a hydrogen production rate of 1.04 m3 m−3 d−1 at a current density of 163 A m−3, a coulombic efficiency of 47.2%, a cathodic hydrogen recovery of 56.7%, a COD removal of 88%, and an electrical energy efficiency based on an electricity input of 89%, which was comparable with that of a Pt/C cathode. CONCLUSIONS The PANI/MWCNTs cathodes developed achieved a performance comparable with that of the Pt/C cathode in terms of the hydrogen production rate. The PANI/MWCNTs composites used as cathodic catalysts to replace Pt/C substantially reduced the cost of the MECs. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jctb.4425

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.014 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00008-2 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/es071720 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yang, Q., Jiang, Y., Xu, Y., Qiu, Y., Chen, Y., Zhu, S., & Shen, S.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Tech University (CN)
  • The College of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Engineering Nanjing Tech University Nanjing 210009 China
Corresponding author
Chen, Yingwen
Venue
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-30
Volume
90
Issue
7
Pages
1263-1269
ISSN
  • 0142-0356 (ISSN-L)
  • 0268-2575
  • 1097-4660
OpenAlex
W1513166606
Cited by
34
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Keywords
microbial electrolysis cells, hydrogen production, polyaniline, multi-walled carbon nanotubes, cathode catalysts, platinum-free catalysts, COD removal, electrocatalytic activity, biomass hydrogen production, Coulombic efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review