The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The recurrence of negatively reinforced responding of humans
Abstract
The recurrence of negatively reinforced responding of humans was studied in three experiments. In each experiment during Baseline, key-pressing produced 3-s timeouts from a requirement to exert finger pressure on a force cell according to variable- or fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. In Experiment 1, resurgence was studied by arranging a differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior schedule in the second phase, and extinction in the Test phase. In Experiment 2, ABA renewal was studied by extinguishing responding in the second phase in a different context and, in the Test phase, by presenting the Baseline-phase context when extinction still was in effect. In Experiment 3, reinstatement was studied by arranging extinction in the second phase, followed by the delivery of response-independent timeouts in the Test phase. Resurgence and renewal occurred consistently for each participant in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. In Experiment 3, reinstatement was observed less consistently in four participants. The results of these experiments replicate and extend to negatively reinforced responding previous findings of the resurgence and renewal of positively reinforced responding obtained mainly with nonhuman animals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, resurgence of negatively reinforced behavior maintained by escape has been demonstrated (Alessandri, Lattal, & Cançado, 2015)”
From Relapse of anxiety-related fear and avoidance: Conceptual analysis of treatment with acceptance and commitment therapy (2020) · cites this paper as Alessandri, Lattal, & Cançado, 2015
In the citing paper
“Although a handful of resurgence studies have examined negatively reinforced target behaviors in humans (Alessandri et al., 2015; Bruzek, Thompson, & Peters, 2009; Marsteller & St Peter, 2012; Volkert, Lerman, Call, & Trosclair-Lasserre, 2009; Wacker et al., 2013), to our knowledge, none have included positively reinforced alternative behaviors, a promising area for future research.”
From Relapse of anxiety-related fear and avoidance: Conceptual analysis of treatment with acceptance and commitment therapy (2020) · cites this paper as Alessandri et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
Renewal after the extinction of free operant behavior
Bouton, M. E., Todd, T. P., Vurbic, D., & Winterbauer, N. E. (2011) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-011-0018-6 · Cited by 281
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.05.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.009 · DOI
- 10.1101/lm.78804 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.2009-92-327 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00131-5 · DOI
- Critchfield T. S., 2007, It's aversive to have an incomplete science of behavior, Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 33, 1
- 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-313 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03196746 · DOI
- Epstein R., 1983, Resurgence of previously reinforced behavior during extinction, Behaviour Analysis Letters, 3, 391
- 10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.3.004 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03214424 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03393137 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03392026 · DOI
- 10.1037/13938-004 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0076418 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0022760 · DOI
- 10.1006/lmot.2000.1064 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0020519 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03392064 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.fbp.0000224385.09486.ba · DOI
- 10.3758/LB.37.4.357 · DOI
- 10.1002/jaba.163 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1958.tb00658.x · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-153 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-91 · DOI
- 10.1037/11256-000 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-0965(69)90088-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-0965(66)90038-5 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13420-013-0116-8 · DOI
- 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-295 · DOI
- 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-145 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smith, B. M., Smith, G. S., & Dymond, S. (2020) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.573 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Alessandri, J., Lattal, K. A., & Cançado, C. R. X.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- West Virginia University (US)
- Universidade de Brasília (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Lattal, Kennon A.
- Venue
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 211-222
- ISSN
- 0022-5002 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3711
- OpenAlex
- W2330944917
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- resurgence, renewal, reinstatement, extinction, differential reinforcement of other behavior, variable-ratio schedules, fixed-ratio schedules, human behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Escape Reaction, Extinction, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Psychomotor Performance, Recurrence, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reinforcement Schedule, Muscle Strength, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The recurrence of negatively reinforced responding of humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jeab.178
- The paper
- Alessandri, J., Lattal, K. A., & Cançado, C. R. X. (2015). The recurrence of negatively reinforced responding of humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.178