Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 609

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

S100B in brain damage and neurodegeneration

Rothermundt, Matthias, Peters, Marion, Prehn, Jochen H.M., Arolt, Volker·2003·Microscopy Research and Technique

Abstract

S100B is a calcium‐binding peptide produced mainly by astrocytes that exert paracrine and autocrine effects on neurons and glia. Some knowledge has been acquired from in vitro and in vivo animal experiments to understand S100B's roles in cellular energy metabolism, cytoskeleton modification, cell proliferation, and differentiation. Also, insights have been gained regarding the interaction between S100B and the cerebral immune system, and the regulation of S100B activity through serotonergic transmission. Secreted glial S100B exerts trophic or toxic effects depending on its concentration. At nanomolar concentrations, S100B stimulates neurite outgrowth and enhances survival of neurons during development. In contrast, micromolar levels of extracellular S100B in vitro stimulate the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and induce apoptosis. In animal studies, changes in the cerebral concentration of S100B cause behavioral disturbances and cognitive deficits. In humans, increased S100B has been detected with various clinical conditions. Brain trauma and ischemia is associated with increased S100B concentrations, probably due to the destruction of astrocytes. In neurodegenerative, inflammatory and psychiatric diseases, increased S100B levels may be caused by secreted S100B or release from damaged astrocytes. This review summarizes published findings on S100B regarding human brain damage and neurodegeneration. Findings from in vitro and in vivo animal experiments relevant for human neurodegenerative diseases and brain damage are reviewed together with the results of studies on traumatic, ischemic, and inflammatory brain damage as well as neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. Methodological problems are discussed and perspectives for future research are outlined. Microsc. Res. Tech. 60:614–632, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jemt.10303

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 609

Metadata

Authors
Rothermundt, M., Peters, M., Prehn, J. H. M., & Arolt, V.
Venue
Microscopy Research and Technique
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03-12
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
614-632
ISSN
  • 1059-910X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0029
OpenAlex
W2042735193
Cited by
609
References
3
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: S100B in brain damage and neurodegeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jemt.10303
The paper
Rothermundt, M., Peters, M., Prehn, J. H. M., & Arolt, V. (2003). S100B in brain damage and neurodegeneration. Microscopy Research and Technique. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.10303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.