Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microstructure and mineral composition of dental enamel of permanent and deciduous teeth

De Menezes Oliveira, Maria Angélica Hueb, Torres, Carolina Paes, Gomes‐Silva, Jaciara Miranda, Chinelatti, Michelle Alexandra, De Menezes, Fernando Carlos Hueb, Palma‐Dibb, Regina Guenka, Borsatto, Maria Cristina·2010·Microscopy Research and Technique

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated and compared in vitro the microstructure and mineral composition of permanent and deciduous teeth's dental enamel. Methods: Sound third molars (n = 12) and second primary molars (n = 12) were selected and randomly assigned to the following groups, according to the analysis method performed (n = 4): Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X‐Ray diffraction (XRD) and Energy dispersive X‐ray spectrometer (EDS). Qualitative and quantitative comparisons of the dental enamel were done. The microscopic findings were analyzed statistically by a nonparametric test (Kruskal‐Wallis). The measurements of the prisms number and thickness were done in SEM photomicrographs. The relative amounts of calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) were determined by EDS investigation. Chemical phases present in both types of teeth were observed by the XRD analysis. Results: The mean thickness measurements observed in the deciduous teeth enamel was 1.14 mm and in the permanent teeth enamel was 2.58 mm. The mean rod head diameter in deciduous teeth was statistically similar to that of permanent teeth enamel, and a slightly decrease from the outer enamel surface to the region next to the enamel‐dentine junction was assessed. The numerical density of enamel rods was higher in the deciduous teeth, mainly near EDJ, that showed statistically significant difference. The percentage of Ca and P was higher in the permanent teeth enamel. Conclusions: The primary enamel structure showed a lower level of Ca and P, thinner thickness and higher numerical density of rods. Microsc. Res. Tech., 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jemt.20796

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
De Menezes Oliveira, M. A. H., Torres, C. P., Gomes‐Silva, J. M., Chinelatti, M. A., De Menezes, F. C. H., Palma‐Dibb, R. G., & Borsatto, M. C.
Venue
Microscopy Research and Technique
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-23
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
572-577
ISSN
  • 1059-910X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0029
OpenAlex
W1990072502
Cited by
253
References
9
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microstructure and mineral composition of dental enamel of permanent and deciduous teeth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jemt.20796
The paper
De Menezes Oliveira, M. A. H., Torres, C. P., Gomes‐Silva, J. M., Chinelatti, M. A., De Menezes, F. C. H., Palma‐Dibb, R. G., & Borsatto, M. C. (2010). Microstructure and mineral composition of dental enamel of permanent and deciduous teeth. Microscopy Research and Technique. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20796

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.