The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain tumor detection and classification: A framework of marker‐based watershed algorithm and multilevel priority features selection
Abstract
Brain tumor identification using magnetic resonance images (MRI) is an important research domain in the field of medical imaging. Use of computerized techniques helps the doctors for the diagnosis and treatment against brain cancer. In this article, an automated system is developed for tumor extraction and classification from MRI. It is based on marker‐based watershed segmentation and features selection. Five primary steps are involved in the proposed system including tumor contrast, tumor extraction, multimodel features extraction, features selection, and classification. A gamma contrast stretching approach is implemented to improve the contrast of a tumor. Then, segmentation is done using marker‐based watershed algorithm. Shape, texture, and point features are extracted in the next step and high ranked 70% features are only selected through chi‐square max conditional priority features approach. In the later step, selected features are fused using a serial‐based concatenation method before classifying using support vector machine. All the experiments are performed on three data sets including Harvard, BRATS 2013, and privately collected MR images data set. Simulation results clearly reveal that the proposed system outperforms existing methods with greater precision and accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brain tumor segmentation with Deep Neural Networks
Havaei, M., Davy, A., Warde-Farley, D., Biard, A., Courville, A., Bengio, Y., Pal, C., Jodoin, P.-M., & Larochelle, H. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.05.004 · Cited by 3,278
Big data analysis for brain tumor detection: Deep convolutional neural networks
Amin, J., Sharif, M., Yasmin, M., & Fernandes, S. L. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.04.065 · Cited by 327
Self-citation
Cited by
Brain tumor detection and classification using machine learning: a comprehensive survey
Amin, J., Sharif, M., Haldorai, A., Yasmin, M., & Nayak, R. S. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00563-y · Cited by 503
Self-citationA decision support system for multimodal brain tumor classification using deep learning
Sharif, M. I., Khan, M. A., Alhussein, M., Aurangzeb, K., & Raza, M. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00321-0 · Cited by 305
Self-citationSaba, T. (2020) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.033 · Cited by 284
Self-citationDeep Learning for Smart Healthcare—A Survey on Brain Tumor Detection from Medical Imaging
Arabahmadi, M., Farahbakhsh, R., & Rezazadeh, J. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22051960 · Cited by 253
Brain Tumor Detection Based on Multimodal Information Fusion and Convolutional Neural Network
Li, M., Kuang, L., Xu, S., & Sha, Z. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2958370 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, M. A., Lali, I. U., Rehman, A., Ishaq, M., Sharif, M., Saba, T., Zahoor, S., & Akram, T.
- Venue
- Microscopy Research and Technique
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-02-23
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 909-922
- ISSN
- 1059-910X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0029
- OpenAlex
- W2916213758
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain tumor detection and classification: A framework of marker‐based watershed algorithm and multilevel priority features selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jemt.23238
- The paper
- Khan, M. A., Lali, I. U., Rehman, A., Ishaq, M., Sharif, M., Saba, T., Zahoor, S., & Akram, T. (2019). Brain tumor detection and classification: A framework of marker‐based watershed algorithm and multilevel priority features selection. Microscopy Research and Technique. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.