Cited by 327Brain Tumor Detection and ClassificationMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesAI in cancer detection

Big data analysis for brain tumor detection: Deep convolutional neural networks

Amin, Javeria, Sharif, Muhammad, Yasmin, Mussarat, Fernandes, Steven Lawrence·2018·Future Generation Computer Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2018.04.065

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amin, J., Sharif, M., Yasmin, M., & Fernandes, S. L.
Affiliations
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
  • Sahyadri College of Engineering & Management (IN)
Corresponding author
Yasmin, Mussarat
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
87
Pages
290-297
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799476711
Cited by
327
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 8
FWCI
15.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
brain tumor detection, brain tumor segmentation, brain tumor classification, magnetic resonance imaging, convolutional neural networks, image patch classification, BraTS, medical image segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review