Cited by 36Evolution and Paleontology StudiesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsPhilosophy and History of Science

Novelties That Change Carrying Capacity

Erwin, Douglas H.·2012·Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution

Abstract

Comparative developmental studies have revealed a rich array of details about the patterns and processes of morphological change in animals and increasingly in plants. But, applying these insights to the study of major episodes of evolutionary innovation requires understanding how these novel morphologies become established and sufficiently abundant (either as individuals within a species or as a clade of species) to be preserved in the fossil record, and, in many cases, to influence ecological processes. Evolutionary novelties may: (1) disappear without changing the species; (2) be associated with the generation (through selection or drift) of a new species; and if the latter (3) may or may not become ecologically significant. Only the latter are commonly preserved in the fossil record. These alternatives mirror the distinction among historians of technology between innovation and invention. Here, I argue that specific sorts of evolutionary inventions drive ecological transformation, essentially constructing an environment for themselves and ancillary organisms through ecological spillover effects, increasing the “carrying capacity” of an ecosystem. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 318B:460–465, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jez.b.21429

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of particular interest is the involvement of niche construction and ecosystem engineering in this stage.

    “Of particular interest is the involvement of niche construction and ecosystem engineering in this stage [43,46,72].”

    From Novelty and Innovation in the History of Life (2015) · cites this paper as [72]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erwin, D. H.
Affiliations
Santa Fe Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Erwin, Douglas H.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-27
Volume
318
Issue
6
Pages
460-465
ISSN
  • 1552-5007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5015
OpenAlex
W2116053177
Cited by
36
References
47
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Santa Fe Institute
  • NASA Astrobiology Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
evolutionary innovation, carrying capacity, ecological transformation, morphological changes, speciation, comparative developmental biology
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Biological Evolution, Plants, Population Dynamics, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review