The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Serial administration of a modified richmond agitation and sedation scale for delirium screening
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Because delirium is a common yet frequently unrecognized condition, this study sought to design a brief screening tool for a core feature of mental status and to validate the instrument as a serial assessment for delirium. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary VA Hospital in New England. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 95 veterans admitted to the medical service. METHODS: A consensus panel developed a modified version of the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) to capture alterations in consciousness. Upon admission, and daily thereafter, patients were screened with a modified RASS (mRASS) and independently underwent a comprehensive mental status interview by a geriatric expert, who determined whether the criteria for delirium were met. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio (LR) of the mRASS for delirium are reported. RESULTS: As a single assessment, the mRASS had a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 93% for delirium (LR, 9.4). When used to detect change, serial mRASS assessments had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 92% (LR, 8.9) in both prevalent and incident delirium. When prevalent cases were excluded, any change in the mRASS had a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 92% for incident delirium (LR, 10.2) CONCLUSION: When administered daily, the mRASS has good sensitivity and specificity for incident delirium. Given the brevity of the instrument (<30 seconds), consideration should be given to incorporating the modified RASS as a daily screening measure for consciousness and delirium. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2012; © 2012 Society of Hospital Medicine
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179 · Cited by 18,540
Sessler, C. N., Gosnell, M. S., Grap, M. J., Brophy, G. M., O'Neal, P. V., Keane, K. A., Tesoro, E. P., & Elswick, R. K. (2002) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.2107138 · Cited by 3,695
Delirium epidemiology in critical care (DECCA): an international study
Salluh, J. I., Soares, M., Teles, J. M., Ceraso, D., Raimondi, N., Nava, V. S., Blasquez, P., Ugarte, S., Ibanez-Guzman, C., Centeno, J. V., et al. (2010) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc9333 · Cited by 373
Piccinelli, M., Tessari, E., Bortolomasi, M., Piasere, O., Semenzin, M., Garzotto, N., & Tansella, M. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7078.420 · Cited by 333
Cited by
Inouye, S. K., Westendorp, R. G., & Saczynski, J. S. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60688-1 · Cited by 3,722
Delirium in Older Persons: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment
Oh, E. S., Fong, T. G., Hshieh, T. T., & Inouye, S. K. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.12067 · Cited by 926
Bellelli, G., Morandi, A., Davis, D. H. J., Mazzola, P., Turco, R., Gentile, S., Ryan, T., Cash, H., Guerini, F., Torpilliesi, T., et al. (2014) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afu021 · Cited by 788
Richardson, S. J., Davis, D. H. J., Stephan, B. C. M., Robinson, L., Brayne, C., Barnes, L. E., Taylor, J.-P., Parker, S. G., & Allan, L. M. (2021) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afaa244 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Chester, J. G., Beth Harrington, M., Rudolph, J. L., & on behalf of the VA Delirium Working Group
- Venue
- Journal of Hospital Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12-15
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 450-453
- ISSN
- 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-5606
- OpenAlex
- W1605785259
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serial administration of a modified richmond agitation and sedation scale for delirium screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jhm.1003
- The paper
- Chester, J. G., Beth Harrington, M., Rudolph, J. L., & on behalf of the VA Delirium Working Group. (2012). Serial administration of a modified richmond agitation and sedation scale for delirium screening. Journal of Hospital Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.1003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.