Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Serial administration of a modified richmond agitation and sedation scale for delirium screening

Open access
Chester, Jennifer G., Beth Harrington, Mary, Rudolph, James L., on behalf of the VA Delirium Working Group·2012·Journal of Hospital Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Because delirium is a common yet frequently unrecognized condition, this study sought to design a brief screening tool for a core feature of mental status and to validate the instrument as a serial assessment for delirium. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary VA Hospital in New England. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 95 veterans admitted to the medical service. METHODS: A consensus panel developed a modified version of the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) to capture alterations in consciousness. Upon admission, and daily thereafter, patients were screened with a modified RASS (mRASS) and independently underwent a comprehensive mental status interview by a geriatric expert, who determined whether the criteria for delirium were met. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio (LR) of the mRASS for delirium are reported. RESULTS: As a single assessment, the mRASS had a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 93% for delirium (LR, 9.4). When used to detect change, serial mRASS assessments had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 92% (LR, 8.9) in both prevalent and incident delirium. When prevalent cases were excluded, any change in the mRASS had a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 92% for incident delirium (LR, 10.2) CONCLUSION: When administered daily, the mRASS has good sensitivity and specificity for incident delirium. Given the brevity of the instrument (<30 seconds), consideration should be given to incorporating the modified RASS as a daily screening measure for consciousness and delirium. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2012; © 2012 Society of Hospital Medicine

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jhm.1003

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Chester, J. G., Beth Harrington, M., Rudolph, J. L., & on behalf of the VA Delirium Working Group
Venue
Journal of Hospital Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-15
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
450-453
ISSN
  • 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-5606
OpenAlex
W1605785259
Cited by
165
References
4
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serial administration of a modified richmond agitation and sedation scale for delirium screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jhm.1003
The paper
Chester, J. G., Beth Harrington, M., Rudolph, J. L., & on behalf of the VA Delirium Working Group. (2012). Serial administration of a modified richmond agitation and sedation scale for delirium screening. Journal of Hospital Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.1003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.