Cited by 926Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency

Delirium in Older Persons: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment

Open access
Oh, Esther S., Fong, Tamara G., Hshieh, Tammy T., Inouye, Sharon K.·2017·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Delirium is defined as an acute disorder of attention and cognition. It is a common, serious, and often fatal condition among older patients. Although often underrecognized, delirium has serious adverse effects on the individual's function and quality of life, as well as broad societal effects with substantial health care costs. Objective: To summarize the current state of the art in diagnosis and treatment of delirium and to highlight critical areas for future research to advance the field. Evidence Review: Search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for the past 6 years, from January 1, 2011, until March 16, 2017, using a combination of controlled vocabulary and keyword terms. Since delirium is more prevalent in older adults, the focus was on studies in elderly populations; studies based solely in the intensive care unit (ICU) and non-English-language articles were excluded. Findings: Of 127 articles included, 25 were clinical trials, 42 cohort studies, 5 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and 55 were other categories. A total of 11 616 patients were represented in the treatment studies. Advances in diagnosis have included the development of brief screening tools with high sensitivity and specificity, such as the 3-Minute Diagnostic Assessment; 4 A's Test; and proxy-based measures such as the Family Confusion Assessment Method. Measures of severity, such as the Confusion Assessment Method-Severity Score, can aid in monitoring response to treatment, risk stratification, and assessing prognosis. Nonpharmacologic approaches focused on risk factors such as immobility, functional decline, visual or hearing impairment, dehydration, and sleep deprivation are effective for delirium prevention and also are recommended for delirium treatment. Current recommendations for pharmacologic treatment of delirium, based on recent reviews of the evidence, recommend reserving use of antipsychotics and other sedating medications for treatment of severe agitation that poses risk to patient or staff safety or threatens interruption of essential medical therapies. Conclusions and Relevance: Advances in diagnosis can improve recognition and risk stratification of delirium. Prevention of delirium using nonpharmacologic approaches is documented to be effective, while pharmacologic prevention and treatment of delirium remains controversial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2017.12067

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DSM-5 recognizes delirium as a cognitive disorder with a disturbance of attention and awareness, often leading to a confusional state or reduced level of consciousness.

    “The DSM‐5 recognizes delirium as a cognitive disorder with a disturbance of attention (i.e., reduced ability to direct, focus, sustain and shift attention) and awareness (i.e., reduced orientation to the environment). This often leads to what has been referred to as a confusional state or reduced level of consciousness 180 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oh, E. S., Fong, T. G., Hshieh, T. T., & Inouye, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2017-09-26
Volume
318
Issue
12
Pages
1161
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2759229677
Cited by
926
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 163 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
58.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001102)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG031720, K07AG041835, P50AG005146, R24AG054259, R01AG044518, K23AG043504)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
Keywords
delirium, older adults, delirium diagnosis, delirium screening tools, Confusion Assessment Method, delirium severity assessment, delirium prevention, non-pharmacological treatment, immobility, antipsychotic drugs, sedating medications, delirium management, risk stratification
MeSH terms
Emergence Delirium, Aged, Delirium, Electroencephalography, Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Antipsychotic Agents, Biomarkers, Geriatric Assessment, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review