Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): an integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception

Colwell, Kevin; Hiscock‐Anisman, Cheryl K.; Memon, Amina; Taylor, Laura; Prewett, Jessica

doi:10.1002/jip.73

Cited by 108Deception detection and forensic psychologyTorture, Ethics, and LawMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): an integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception

Colwell, Kevin, Hiscock‐Anisman, Cheryl K., Memon, Amina, Taylor, Laura, Prewett, Jessica·2007·Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling

DOI 10.1002/jip.73

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study describes the assimilation and validation of Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID). ACID is derived from investigative interviewing, Criteria‐Based Content Analysis, Reality Monitoring, and interpersonal deception. Each component has been previously published. Thirty‐eight university undergraduates entered a professor's office and either stole an exam or replaced an exam that had been stolen previously. They were interviewed 1 week later with the Reality Interview, which is deliberately challenging and aims to enhance the detection of deception. Half responded honestly and completely; half distorted their responses to avoid incrimination. Incentives were provided. Honest responses were longer, more detailed, and contained more admissions of potential mistakes. Most importantly, honest respondents benefited from attempts to enhance recall, whereas these same attempts caused deceptive respondents to provide shorter, more repetitive statements. This is a promising technique; 33 of 38 cases were classified accurately. Discussion includes characteristics of deception, process of deception during an investigative interview, hypothetical interview strategies to facilitate the detection of deception, strengths and weaknesses of the study, and areas for future research. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jip.73

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Providing a convincing false account is more demanding than completing legitimate activity and then providing a truthful account.
“Hence, providing a convincing false account is more demanding than completing legitimate activity and then providing a truthful account.”
From Sorting Insiders From Co-Workers: Remote Synchronous Computer-Mediated Triage for Investigating Insider Attacks (2024) · cites this paper as K. Colwell et al., 2007

Manuscript Preparation
Editorial Office (1997) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089297765555359 · Cited by 3,941
Cues to deception
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74 · Cited by 2,479
Reality monitoring.
Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.1.67 · Cited by 1,658
Untitled work
(1992) · Cited by 1,155
Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.
Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.371 · Cited by 1,046
Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice
Vrij, A. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 625
Detecting lies and deceit: the psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice
Clifford, B. R. (2001) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.743 · Cited by 541
Information manipulation theory
McCornack, S. A. (1992) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759209376245 · Cited by 529
The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: a review of the empirical evidence
Masip, J., Sporer, S. L., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2004) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/10683160410001726356 · Cited by 320
Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load
Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., Mann, S. A., & Leal, S. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.003 · Cited by 319
Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis.
Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P., & Holland, H. L. (1985) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70.2.401 · Cited by 305
Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach.
Johnson, M. K. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.390 · Cited by 287
The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context.
Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01498980 · Cited by 260
Suspects, lies, and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stake liars.
Mann, S. A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2002) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1015332606792 · Cited by 256
Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis.
Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P., & Holland, H. L. (1985) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.70.2.401 · Cited by 254
The Motivational Impairment Effect in the Communication of Deception
DePaulo, B. M., & Kirkendol, S. E. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7856-1_3 · Cited by 233
Interviewing techniques and the assessment of statement credibility
Colwell, K., Hiscock, C. K., & Memon, A. (2002) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.788 · Cited by 117
Self-citation
Repeated Interrogations –Stretching the Deception Detection Paradigm
Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (1999) · Expert Evidence · doi:10.1023/a:1008993326434 · Cited by 116
Partners in Crime: How Liars in Collusion Betray Themselves1
Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Jonsson, A. (2003) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01928.x · Cited by 103
Criteria-Based Content Analysis: An empirical test of its underlying processes
Vrij, A., & Mann, S. A. (2006) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/10683160500129007 · Cited by 57
Strategies of impression management among deceivers and truth-tellers: How liars attempt to convince.
Colwell, K., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., Memon, A., Woods, D. M., & Michlik, P. M. (2006) · American journal of forensic psychology · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Challenging interviewees during interviews: The potential effects on lie detection
Vrij, A. (2005) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/10683160512331331319 · Cited by 45
Training in Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception to Improve Credibility Judgments
Colwell, K., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., Memon, A., Colwell, L. H., Taylor, L. A., & Woods, D. M. (2009) · Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice · doi:10.1080/15228930902810078 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Police officers and civilians as witnesses: intergroup biases and memory performance
Lindholm, T., Christianson, S., & Karlsson, I. (1997) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199710)11:5 · Cited by 24
Vividness and spontaneity of statement detail charateristics as predictors of witness credibility
Colwell, K., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., Memon, A., Rachel, A., & Colwell, L. H. (2007) · American journal of forensic psychology · Cited by 24
Self-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Hiscock‐Anisman C. Colwell K. Memon A. &Laurita A.(2008).Using the Reality Interview to improve credibility assessment. Manuscript under review.
Memon A. Mastroberardino S. Fraser J. &Colwell K.(2008).Reality Monitoring and credibility assessment. Manuscript under review.

Sorted by citations

Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0023589 · Cited by 668
A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta‐analysis
Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., & Blank, H. (2015) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1111/lcrp.12088 · Cited by 326
A social-cognitive framework for understanding serious lies: Activation-decision-construction-action theory
Walczyk, J. J., Harris, L. L., Duck, T. K., & Mulay, D. (2014) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.03.001 · Cited by 311
Lie Detection from Multiple Cues: A Meta‐analysis
Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F. (2014) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3052 · Cited by 245
Examining Rapport in Investigative Interviews with Suspects: Does its Building and Maintenance Work?
Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2011) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-011-9087-x · Cited by 179
Validity of content-based techniques to distinguish true and fabricated statements: A meta-analysis.
Oberlader, V. A., Naefgen, C., Koppehele‐Gossel, J., Quinten, L. K. J. L., Banse, R., & Schmidt, A. F. (2016) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000193 · Cited by 155
Deception and truth detection when analyzing nonverbal and verbal cues
Vrij, A. (2018) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3457 · Cited by 96
Reality Monitoring: A Meta-analytical Review for Forensic Practice
Gancedo, Y., Rivera, F. F., Seijo, D., Vázquez, M. V., & Fernández, R. A. (2021) · The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context · doi:10.5093/ejpalc2021a10 · Cited by 79
Verbal Deception and the Model Statement as a Lie Detection Tool
Vrij, A., Leal, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00492 · Cited by 70
Markers of Deception in Italian Speech
Spence, K., Villar, G., & Arciuli, J. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00453 · Cited by 64
Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future
Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Ashkenazi, T., Ganis, G., Leal, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12121644 · Cited by 69
Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception: An Example of the New Paradigm of Differential Recall Enhancement
Colwell, K., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., & Fede, J. H. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5547-9_11 · Cited by 54
Self-citation
Discriminating deceptive from truthful statements using the verifiability approach: A meta‐analysis
Verschuère, B., Bogaard, G., & Meijer, E. H. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3775 · Cited by 61
Helping to sort the liars from the truth‐tellers: The gradual revelation of information during investigative interviews
Dando, C. J., Bull, R., Ormerod, T. C., & Sandham, A. L. (2013) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1111/lcrp.12016 · Cited by 52
Deceiving and Detecting Deceit
DePaulo, B. M., & Bond, C. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0063 · Cited by 53
Distinguishing truthful from invented accounts using reality monitoring criteria
Memon, A., Fraser, J., Colwell, K., Odinot, G., & Mastroberardino, S. (2009) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1348/135532508x401382 · Cited by 49
Self-citation
Validity of content‐based techniques for credibility assessment—How telling is an extended meta‐analysis taking research bias into account?
Oberlader, V. A., Quinten, L. K. J. L., Banse, R., Volbert, R., Schmidt, A. F., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3776 · Cited by 53
Impression management strategies of deceivers and honest reporters in an investigative interview
Montalvo, L., Ansarra, R., Garrett, E., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., Colwell, K., & Hines, A. (2010) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 47
Self-citation
Carving Pinocchio: Longitudinal examination of children’s lying for different goals
Talwar, V., Lavoie, J., & Crossman, A. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.003 · Cited by 49
Airport artificial intelligence can detect deception: or am i lying?
Jupe, L. M., & Keatley, D. A. (2019) · Security Journal · doi:10.1057/s41284-019-00204-7 · Cited by 48
Plausibility: A Verbal Cue to Veracity worth Examining?
Vrij, A., Deeb, H., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., & Fisher, R. P. (2020) · The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context · doi:10.5093/ejpalc2021a4 · Cited by 41
Benefit Fraud Investigative Interviewing: A Self‐Report Study of Investigation Professionals' Beliefs Concerning Practice
Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2011) · Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling · doi:10.1002/jip.137 · Cited by 35
Interviewing to Detect Deception: When to Disclose the Evidence?
Sorochinski, M., Hartwig, M., Osborne, J. R., Wilkins, E., Marsh, J. J., Kazakov, D., & Granhag, P. A. (2013) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-013-9121-2 · Cited by 44
Verbal Lie Detection Tools From an Applied Perspective
Vrij, A. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812729-2.00013-6 · Cited by 34
Using the Reality Interview improves the accuracy of the Criteria‐Based Content Analysis and Reality Monitoring
Bogaard, G., Colwell, K., & Crans, S. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3537 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Training in Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception to Improve Credibility Judgments
Colwell, K., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., Memon, A., Colwell, L. H., Taylor, L. A., & Woods, D. M. (2009) · Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice · doi:10.1080/15228930902810078 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
THE COGNITIVE INTERVIEW FOR SUSPECTS (CIS)
Geiselman, R. E. (2012) · Cited by 31
A cognitive framework for understanding development of the ability to deceive
Walczyk, J. J., & Fargerson, C. (2019) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.02.003 · Cited by 32
A cognitive approach to elicit verbal and nonverbal cues to deceit
Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., Blank, H., Leal, S., & Mann, S. A. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316225608.017 · Cited by 31
Interviewing Suspects of Fraud: An In-Depth Analysis of Interviewing Skills
Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2010) · The Journal of Psychiatry & Law · doi:10.1177/009318531003800106 · Cited by 29
Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): Replication and Gender Differences
Suckle-Nelson, J. A., Colwell, K., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., Florence, S., Youschak, K. E., & Duarte, A. (2010) · The Open Criminology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874917801003010023 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Detecting deception through small talk and comparable truth baselines
Palena, N., Caso, L., Vrij, A., & Orthey, R. (2018) · Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling · doi:10.1002/jip.1495 · Cited by 29
Automated insights: verbal cues to deception in real-life high-stakes lies
McQuaid, S. M., Woodworth, M., Hutton, E. L., Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2015) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2015.1008477 · Cited by 32
Should Police Use ACID? Training and Credibility Assessment Using Transcripts Versus Recordings
Colwell, K., James-Kangal, N., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., & Phelan, V. (2015) · Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice · doi:10.1080/15228932.2015.1035187 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Detecting truth in suspect interviews: the effect of use of evidence (early and gradual) and time delay on Criteria-Based Content Analysis, Reality Monitoring and inconsistency within suspect statements
McDougall, A. J., & Bull, R. (2014) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2014.994631 · Cited by 24
Interviewing to detect omission lies
Leal, S., Vrij, A., Deeb, H., & Fisher, R. P. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4020 · Cited by 24
“Pain Is What the Patient Says It Is”: Nurse–Patient Communication, Information Seeking, and Pain Management
Miller, L. E., Eldredge, S. A., & Dalton, E. D. (2016) · American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® · doi:10.1177/1049909116661815 · Cited by 24
How Fake News Differs From Personal Lies
Chiu, M. M., & Oh, Y. W. (2020) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764220910243 · Cited by 19
The Pinocchio effect and the Cold Stress Test: Lies and thermography
Moline, A. D., Galvéz-García, G., Fernández‐Gómez, J., de la Fuente, J., Iborra, O., Tornay, F. J., Mata, J. L., Puertollano, M., & Milán, E. G. (2017) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12956 · Cited by 22
Drawing-based deception detection techniques: a state-of-the-art review
Giolla, E. M., Granhag, P. A., & Vernham, Z. (2017) · Crime Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/23744006.2017.1393986 · Cited by 19
The mental nose and the Pinocchio effect: Thermography, planning, anxiety, and lies
Moline, A. D., Domínguez, E. F., Salazar-López, E., Galvéz-García, G., Fernández‐Gómez, J., de la Fuente, J., Iborra, O., Tornay, F. J., & Milán, E. G. (2018) · Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling · doi:10.1002/jip.1505 · Cited by 21
Using Specific Model Statements to Elicit Information and Cues to Deceit in Information-Gathering Interviews
Porter, C. N., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Vernham, Z., Salvanelli, G., & McIntyre, N. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.10.003 · Cited by 19
Police accuracy in truth/lie detection when judging baseline interviews
Caso, L., Palena, N., Carlessi, E., & Vrij, A. (2019) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2019.1642258 · Cited by 16
The Science of Lie Detection by Verbal Cues: What Are the Prospects for Its Practical Applicability?
Brennen, T., & Magnussen, S. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835285 · Cited by 21
Teaching Professionals to Detect Deception: The Efficacy of a Brief Training Workshop
Colwell, L. H., Colwell, K., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., Hartwig, M., Cole, L. M., Werdin, K., & Youschak, K. E. (2012) · Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice · doi:10.1080/15228932.2012.629592 · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Detecting children's false allegations and recantations of a crime
Wyman, J. D., Foster, I., Lavoie, J., Tong, D., & Talwar, V. (2017) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2017.1402018 · Cited by 12
Verbal cues in omission lies: The effect of informing sources about the essential part of the event
Leal, S., Vrij, A., Deeb, H., & Fisher, R. P. (2024) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4232 · Cited by 11
Pathways to truth: using criteria-based content analysis in missing person cases
Richards, Y., & Keatley, D. A. (2023) · Journal of Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1108/jcp-11-2022-0032 · Cited by 11
Observers’ performance at evaluating truthfulness when provided with comparable truth or small talk baselines
Caso, L., Palena, N., Vrij, A., & Gnisci, A. (2019) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2018.1553471 · Cited by 11
Sorting Insiders From Co-Workers: Remote Synchronous Computer-Mediated Triage for Investigating Insider Attacks
Dando, C. J., Taylor, P. J., Menacere, T., Ormerod, T. C., Ball, L. J., & Sandham, A. L. (2024) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211068292 · Cited by 10
“This disparity offers opportunities for detection (e.g., K. Colwell et al., 2007; Kohan et al., 2020; Vrij et al., 2017).”
Background
Public appeals, news interviews and crocodile tears: an argument for multi-channel analysis
Archer, D., & Lansley, C. (2015) · Corpora · doi:10.3366/cor.2015.0075 · Cited by 10
True and intentionally fabricated memories
Justice, L. V., Morrison, C. M., & Conway, M. A. (2012) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.734832 · Cited by 10
A comparison of different investigative interviewing techniques in generating differential recall enhancement and detecting deception
De Rosa, J., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., Blythe, A., Bogaard, G., Hally, A., & Colwell, K. (2019) · Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling · doi:10.1002/jip.1519 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Eliciting information and cues to deception using a model statement: Examining the effect of presentation modality
Porter, C. N., & Salvanelli, G. (2020) · Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling · doi:10.1002/jip.1541 · Cited by 11
Lie-detection by strategy manipulation: Developing an asymmetric information management (AIM) technique.
Porter, C. N., Morrison, E. R., Fitzgerald, R. J., Taylor, R., & Harvey, A. C. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.01.004 · Cited by 11
Deception Detection: The Relationship of Levels of Trust and Perspective Taking in Real-Time Online and Offline Communication Environments
Friend, C., & Hamilton, N. F. (2016) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0643 · Cited by 9
The Reciprocal Nature of Lying and Memory: Memory Confabulation and Diagnostic Cues to Deception
Dianiska, R. E., Cash, D. K., Lane, S. M., & Meissner, C. A. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_18 · Cited by 8
Amplifying deceivers’ flawed metacognition: Encouraging disclosures after delays with a model statement
Harvey, A. C., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Hope, L., & Mann, S. A. (2019) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102935 · Cited by 8
Detecting lies about past and future actions: the strategic use of evidence (SUE) technique and suspects' strategies
Clemens, F. (2013) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) · Cited by 8
Timing does matter: Examining imagery's impact on the temporal origins of false beliefs
Bays, R. B., Foley, M. A., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2012) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.10.004 · Cited by 7
Home is where the heart lies? A study of false address giving to police
Roach, J. O. (2009) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1348/135532509x466344 · Cited by 7
A trifactorial model of detection of deception using thermography
Galvéz-García, G., Fernández‐Gómez, J., Bascour–Sandoval, C., Albayay, J., González-Quiñones, J. J., Moline, A. D., Pérez-Luco, R., Boso, À., & Milán, E. G. (2020) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2020.1815198 · Cited by 6
A Commentary on Information Manipulation Theory 2
Walczyk, J. J. (2014) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x14535395 · Cited by 6
Task-related spontaneous thought: A novel direction in the study of true and false intentions.
Giolla, E. M., Granhag, P. A., & Ask, K. (2016) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.04.010 · Cited by 6
Observers' accuracy in detecting deception in non‐native speakers versus native speakers: A systematic review
Wylie, K., Pena, M. M., Miller, K. B., Palmer, M. E., & Tate, E. (2022) · Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling · doi:10.1002/jip.1595 · Cited by 6
Making the Subjective Objective? Computer-Assisted Quantification of Qualitative Content Cues to Deception
Sporer, S. L. (2012) · Cited by 6
Justifications and Questions in Detecting Deception
Paik, J. E., & Swol, L. M. V. (2017) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-017-9536-8 · Cited by 6
Assessing the efficacy of baselining in deception detection: A comparative analysis of the reality interview and structured interview
Bogaard, G., van de Bovekamp, A. M., & Colwell, K. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104112 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Es posible discriminar declaraciones reales de imaginadas y huella psíquica real de simulada en casos de violencia de género
Vázquez, M. V. (2011) · Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · Cited by 5
The Effect of Synchrony of Happiness on Facial Expression of Negative Emotion When Lying
Solbu, A., Frank, M. G., Fei, X., Nwogu, I., & Neurohr, M. (2023) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10919-023-00447-4 · Cited by 4
Lying about intentions
Warmelink, L. (2012) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University) · Cited by 4
Towards a theory of true and false intentions
Giolla, E. M. (2016) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) · Cited by 4
The effect of statement type and repetition on deception detection
Cash, D. K., Dianiska, R. E., & Lane, S. M. (2019) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-019-0194-z · Cited by 3
Masking the truth: the impact of face masks on deception detection
Cash, D. K., & Pazos, L. A. (2023) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2023.2195092 · Cited by 3
To Nod or Not to Nod: How Does Interviewer Nonverbal Behavior Affect Rapport Perceptions and Recall in Truth Tellers and Lie Tellers?
Deeb, H., Leal, S., Vrij, A., Mann, S. A., & Dabrowna, O. (2024) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10919-024-00452-1 · Cited by 3
Verbal Deception Cue Training for the Detection of Phishing Emails
Lim, J., Zhou, L., & Zhang, D. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) · doi:10.1109/isi53945.2021.9624738 · Cited by 3
Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality
Harvey, A. C., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Deeb, H., Hope, L., & Mann, S. A. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103130 · Cited by 3
Credibility and event frequency: Assessing the credibility of adults who recall a repeated event using reality monitoring.
Deck, S. L., & Paterson, H. M. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.01.002 · Cited by 3
Arabic within culture forensic interviews: Arabic native speaking lay-observer truth and lie accuracy, confidence, and verbal cue selection
Dando, C. J., Sandham, A. L., Sibbons, C., & Taylor, P. J. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0310384 · Cited by 2
Honesty repeats itself: comparing manual and automated coding on the veracity cues total details and redundancy
Deeb, H., Vrij, A., Palena, N., Hypšová, P., Dib, G., Leal, S., & Mann, S. A. (2024) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716424000298 · Cited by 2
Lie Detection and Nonverbal Behaviour: Present and Future
Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70064-4_15 · Cited by 3
Catching liars by listening carefully
Bogaard (2017) · doi:10.26481/dis.20170127gb · Cited by 2
CORMAS: A Computerized Tool for the Analysis of Eyewitness Memory Correspondence
Mulder, R. V. D., van Noortwijk, K., Goldsmith, M., Pansky, A., Koriat, A., & Labin, S. K. (2010) · European journal of law and technology · Cited by 1
Veracity Judgments Based on Complications: A Training Experiment
Deeb, H., Vrij, A., Burkhardt, J., Leal, S., & Mann, S. A. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14090839 · Cited by 1
Why Methods Matter: Approaches to the Study of Deception and Considerations for the Future
Carr, Z. M., Solbu, A., & Frank, M. G. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_14 · Cited by 1
True and False Intentions: A Science of Lies About the Future
Giolla, E. M., & Granhag, P. A. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_20 · Cited by 1
Lie to me: investigating the strategic regulation of fine-grain details in truth-tellers and liars
Harvey, A. C. (2013) · e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) · Cited by 1
Eliciting admissions from suspects in criminal investigations
Tekin, S. (2016) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) · Cited by 1
Truth and Deception in Informants' Accounts of Criminal Admissions
Boydell, C. A., & Read, J. D. (2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e669802012-187 · Cited by 1
Fact, fiction or belief? Generating, reporting and distinguishing real and fabricated memories
Justice, L. V. (2012) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University)
Deception
Kadva, A. K. (2010) · doi:10.31979/etd.xrwb-mhf5
CORMAS: A Computerized Tool for the Analysis of Eyewitness Memory
van Noortwijk, K., Goldsmith, M., Pansky, A., Koriat, A., Labin, S. K., & Mulder, D. (2010)
Detecting Individual-Level Deception in the Digital Age
de Silva, E. (2015) · Advances in digital crime, forensics, and cyber terrorism book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9661-7.ch015
An Examination of the Credibility of Witnesses who Recall a Repeated Event: Cognitive Competence, Honesty, and Perceived Credibility
Deck, S. L. (2021) · The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney)
Using cognitive instructions to elicit narrative differences between children's true and false testimonies
Tong, D., Wyman, J. D., & Talwar, V. (2021) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3890 · Cited by 1
Detecting Individual-Level Deception in the Digital Age
de Silva, E. (2019) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-2535-7.ch012
Ulric Neisser's contribution to the study of autobiographical memory accuracy
Sotgiu, I. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4006
‘Liars are less detailed’ …So what? Comparing two recall instructions to detect deception within‐subject
Srour, C., Py, J., Grimaud, C., & Roche, S. (2023) · Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling · doi:10.1002/jip.1617
The effect of tailored reciprocity on information provision in an investigative interview
Weiher, L., Winters, C. L., Taylor, P. J., Luther, K., & Watson, S. J. (2024) · Journal of Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1108/jcp-01-2024-0004
Breaking the truth bias: the impact of comparable truth baselines and reality interview on veracity judgments by laypeople and police officers
Bogaard, G., Nieuwkamp, V., & Colwell, K. (2025) · Police Practice and Research · doi:10.1080/15614263.2025.2570276
Self-citation

Augmenting acid with affective details to assess credibility
Fleck, R., Hines, A., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., Colwell, K., Ansarra, R., Cole, L. D., & Belarde, D. (2011) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Training in Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception to Improve Credibility Judgments
Colwell, K., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., Memon, A., Colwell, L. H., Taylor, L. A., & Woods, D. M. (2009) · Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice · doi:10.1080/15228930902810078 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): Replication and Gender Differences
Suckle-Nelson, J. A., Colwell, K., Hiscock‐Anisman, C., Florence, S., Youschak, K. E., & Duarte, A. (2010) · The Open Criminology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874917801003010023 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Using reality monitoring to improve deception detection in the context of the cognitive interview for suspects.
Logue, M., Book, A. S., Frosina, P., Huizinga, T., & Amos, S. (2015) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000127 · Cited by 24
Using the Reality Interview improves the accuracy of the Criteria‐Based Content Analysis and Reality Monitoring
Bogaard, G., Colwell, K., & Crans, S. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3537 · Cited by 33
Self-citation

Authors: Colwell, K., Hiscock‐Anisman, C. K., Memon, A., Taylor, L., & Prewett, J.
Affiliations: Southern Connecticut State University (US)
National University (US)
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Valdosta State University (US)
Corresponding author: Colwell, Kevin
ORCID: Colwell, Kevin
Memon, Amina
Taylor, Laura
Venue: Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2007-10
Volume: 4
Issue: 3
Pages: 167-180
ISSN: 1544-4759 (ISSN-L)
1544-4767
DOI: 10.1002/jip.73
OpenAlex: W2136831731
Cited by: 108
References: 25
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI: 4.13
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 351 d)
Locations: Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Torture, Ethics, and Law
Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords: deception detection, investigative interviewing, reality monitoring, interpersonal deception, criteria-based content analysis, interview techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): an integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks