The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neutrophils, host defense, and inflammation: a double-edged sword
Abstract
Neutrophils play important roles in host defense against all classes of infectious agents but, paradoxically, they are also involved in the pathology of various inflammatory conditions. Their microbicidal armory consists of oxidative and nonoxidative processes that are activated simultaneously upon phagocytosis. Although destruction of infectious agents occurs intracellularly, release of cytotoxic molecules into the extracellular milieu can damage body tissues. Neutrophils are heterogeneous. Subpopulations exist in various stages from dormant to primed to fully activated. The activities of neutrophils are regulated locally in microenvironments and systemically by a plethora of mediators including cytokines, “classical” neuroendocrine hormones, and bioactive lipids. The net response depends on a complex balance of stimulatory and inhibitory pathways that are regulated by these mediators. Although some effector and regulatory pathways are vital, considerable redundancy is also evident. Identification of the essential mediators and the unraveling of any interactions may be the keys to understanding the neutrophil paradox and developing therapeutic strategies that optimize microbial killing and minimize host tissue damage. Finally, reports that neutrophils can act as drug delivery vectors and that their function is influenced by stress and other lifestyle factors suggest that new homeostatic functions for these cells, outside their traditional roles in host defense and inflammation, remain to be identified: some are speculated on here. J. Leukoc. Biol. 56: 672–686; 1994.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clancy, R. M., Leszczynska-Piziak, J., & Abramson, S. B. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci115929 · Cited by 686
Stress and immunity: An integrated view of relationships between the brain and the immune system
Dantzer, R., & Kelley, K. W. (1989) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/0024-3205(89)90345-7 · Cited by 534
McKenna, S. M., & Davies, K. J. A. (1988) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2540685 · Cited by 183
Cited by
Role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in apoptosis induction
Simon, H.-U., Haj-Yehia, A., & Levi-Schaffer, F. (2000) · Apoptosis · doi:10.1023/a:1009616228304 · Cited by 2,774
Gorbet, M. B., & Sefton, M. V. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.023 · Cited by 1,347
Regulation of progenitor cell proliferation and granulocyte function by microRNA-223
Johnnidis, J. B., Harris, M. H., Wheeler, R. T., Stehling-Sun, S., Lam, M. H., Kirak, O., Brummelkamp, T. R., Fleming, M. D., & Camargo, F. D. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06607 · Cited by 1,208
Keel, M., & Trentz, O. (2005) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.037 · Cited by 885
Selders, G. S., Fetz, A. E., Radic, M. Z., & Bowlin, G. L. (2017) · Regenerative Biomaterials · doi:10.1093/rb/rbw041 · Cited by 538
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Leukocyte Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-12-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 672-686
- ISSN
- 0741-5400 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3673
- OpenAlex
- W2113842263
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.