The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The structure of the digital setae of lizards
Abstract
Light and electron microscope studies of the digital lamellar setae of geckos and anoline lizards demonstrate that the free ends of the setae consist of flattened spatulas of less than 1 μ in width. The anoline setae are simple structures usually less than 30 μ in length and with a single terminal spatula to each seta. In contrast the setae of geckos are complex structures of about 100 μ in length, with numerous branchings, and having many spatulas per seta. The spatulas of Gekko and Aristelliger were smaller (0.2‐0.4 μ in width) than the spatulas of Anolis (0.8 μ in width). The electron microscope studies indicate that the scales of lizards appear to be covered with small epidermal spines (1.5 μ long). The setae of anoles and geckos are considered to have evolved independently from these more primitive epidermal spines. It is further suggested that the mechanism that allows the lamellae to adhere to the substratum is a surface phenomenon. The spatulas provide a large surface that is in contact with the substratum and thus produces a large total frictional force. The α layer of the lizard stratum corneum can be readily identified in the lamellae. However, the structure of the β layer is not easily interpreted and there is evidence of a fibrous layer between the Oberhautchen and the α layer in the skin of the outer lamellar surface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair
Autumn, K., Liang, Y. A., Hsieh, S. T., Zesch, W., Chan, W. P., Kenny, T. W., Fearing, R., & Full, R. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35015073 · Cited by 2,758
Biological materials: Structure and mechanical properties
Meyers, M. A., Chen, P.-Y., Lin, A. Y.-M., & Seki, Y. (2008) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.002 · Cited by 2,573
A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos
Lee, H., Lee, B. P., & Messersmith, P. B. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05968 · Cited by 2,043
Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae
Autumn, K., Sitti, M., Liang, Y. A., Peattie, A. M., Hansen, W. R., Sponberg, S., Kenny, T. W., Fearing, R., Israelachvili, J. N., & Full, R. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.192252799 · Cited by 1,949
Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae
Hansen, W. R., & Autumn, K. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408304102 · Cited by 601
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruibal, R., & Ernst, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Morphology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1965-11
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-293
- ISSN
- 0362-2525 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2143175951
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The structure of the digital setae of lizards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmor.1051170302
- The paper
- Ruibal, R., & Ernst, V. (1965). The structure of the digital setae of lizards. Journal of Morphology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051170302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.