Cited by 601Adhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityAdvanced Materials and Mechanics

Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae

Open access
Hansen, W. R., Autumn, K.·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A tokay gecko can cling to virtually any surface and support its body mass with a single toe by using the millions of keratinous setae on its toe pads. Each seta branches into hundreds of 200-nm spatulae that make intimate contact with a variety of surface profiles. We showed previously that the combined surface area of billions of spatulae maximizes van der Waals interactions to generate large adhesive and shear forces. Geckos are not known to groom their feet yet retain their stickiness for months between molts. How geckos manage to keep their feet clean while walking about with sticky toes has remained a puzzle until now. Although self-cleaning by water droplets occurs in plant and animal surfaces, no adhesive has been shown to self-clean. In the present study, we demonstrate that gecko setae are a self-cleaning adhesive. Geckos with dirty feet recovered their ability to cling to vertical surfaces after only a few steps. Self-cleaning occurred in arrays of setae isolated from the gecko. Contact mechanical models suggest that self-cleaning occurs by an energetic disequilibrium between the adhesive forces attracting a dirt particle to the substrate and those attracting the same particle to one or more spatulae. We propose that the property of self-cleaning is intrinsic to the setal nanostructure and therefore should be replicable in synthetic adhesive materials in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0408304102

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Autumn, K., Sitti, M., Peattie, A., Hansen, W., Sponberg, S., Liang, Y. A., Kenny, T., Fearing, R., Israelachvili, J. & Full, R. J. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12252-12256.
  2. Huber, G., Gorb, S., Spolenak, R. & Arzt, E. (2005) Biol. Lett. (in press).
  3. Spolenak, R., Gorb, S., Gao, H. & Arzt, E. (2005) Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A (in press).
  4. Johnson, K. L., Kendall, K. & Roberts, A. D. (1973) Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 324, 310-313.
  5. Cassie, A. & Baxter, S. (1944) Trans. Faraday Soc. 40, 546-551.
  6. Patrick, R. L. (Dekker, New York), Vol. 2, pp. 219-260.
  7. Campolo, D., Jones, S. D. & Fearing, R. S. (2003) in IEEE NANO 2003 Conference Proceedings, San Francisco, August 12-14, 2003 (IEEE, New York), pp. 856-859.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansen, W. R., & Autumn, K.
Affiliations
  • Lewis & Clark College (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Autumn, K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-01-03
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
385-389
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2114147125
Cited by
601
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 42
FWCI
45.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0304730)
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
Keywords
gecko setae, self-cleaning, van der Waals adhesion, spatulae, Tokay gecko, dry adhesion, contact mechanics, synthetic adhesives
MeSH terms
Adhesiveness, Animals, Lizards, Models, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review