The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in membrane receptor screening and analysis
Abstract
During the last decade there has been significant progress in the development of analytical techniques for the screening of ligand binding to membranes and membrane receptors. This review focuses on developments using label‐free assays that facilitate ligand–membrane–receptor screening without the need for chemical‐, biological‐ or radiological‐labelled reagents. These assays include acoustic, optical surface plasmon resonance biosensing, sedimentation (analytical ultracentrifugation), chromatographic assays, isothermal titration calorimetry and differential scanning calorimetry. The merits and applications of cell‐based screening systems and of different model membrane systems, including planar supported lipid layers, bead‐supported membranes and lipid micro‐arrays, are discussed. Recent advances involving more established techniques including intrinsic fluorescence, FRET spectroscopy, scintillation proximity assays and automated patch clamping are presented along with applications to peripheral membrane proteins, ion channels and G protein‐coupled receptors. Novel high‐throughput assays for determination of drug‐ and protein‐partitioning in membranes are also highlighted. To aid the experimenter, a brief synopsis of the techniques commonly employed to purify and reconstitute membranes and membrane receptors is included. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Annexins: From Structure to Function
Gerke, V., & Moss, S. E. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00030.2001 · Cited by 2,029
Fitting curves to data using nonlinear regression: a practical and nonmathematical review
Motulsky, H. J., & Ransnas, L. A. (1987) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.1.5.3315805 · Cited by 1,327
Kansy, M., Senner, F., & Gubernator, K. (1998) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm970530e · Cited by 1,304
Guilt-by-association goes global
Oliver, S. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001165 · Cited by 557
Cited by
SHANKARAN, D., GOBI, K., & MIURA, N. (2007) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2006.09.014 · Cited by 607
Patching, S. G. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.04.028 · Cited by 458
Surface Plasmon Resonance: Applications in Understanding Receptor–Ligand Interaction
Pattnaik, P. (2005) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/abab:126:2:079 · Cited by 364
Hit discovery and hit-to-lead approaches
Keserű, G. M., & Makara, G. M. (2006) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2006.06.016 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Recognition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06-24
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 286-315
- ISSN
- 0952-3499 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1352
- OpenAlex
- W2135280506
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in membrane receptor screening and analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmr.675
- The paper
- Cooper, M. A. (2004). Advances in membrane receptor screening and analysis. Journal of Molecular Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmr.675
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.