Cited by 1,327Statistical and numerical algorithmsStatistical Methods and ApplicationsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

Fitting curves to data using nonlinear regression: a practical and nonmathematical review

Motulsky, Harvey J., Ransnas, Lennart A.·1987·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

Many types of data are best analyzed by fitting a curve using nonlinear regression, and computer programs that perform these calculations are readily available. Like every scientific technique, however, a nonlinear regression program can produce misleading results when used inappropriately. This article reviews the use of nonlinear regression in a practical and nonmathematical manner to answer the following questions: Why is nonlinear regression superior to linear regression of transformed data? How does nonlinear regression differ from polynomial regression and cubic spline? How do nonlinear regression programs work? What choices must an investigator make before performing nonlinear regression? What do the final results mean? How can two sets of data or two fits to one set of data be compared? What problems can cause the results to be wrong? This review is designed to demystify nonlinear regression so that both its power and its limitations will be appreciated.— M otulsky , H. J.; R ansnas , L. A. Fitting curves to data using nonlinear regression: a practical and nonmathematical review. FASEB J. 1: 365‐374; 1987.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fasebj.1.5.3315805

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Motulsky, H. J., & Ransnas, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Department of Pharmacology University of California, San Diego La Jolla California 92093 USA
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-11
Volume
1
Issue
5
Pages
365-374
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W1497432777
Cited by
1,327
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 30
FWCI
44.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
nonlinear regression, curve fitting, polynomial regression, cubic splines, model selection, goodness-of-fit comparison, interpretation of regression results
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, Microcomputers, Regression Analysis, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review