Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of automated and manual MRI volumetry of hippocampus in normal aging and dementia

Open access
Hsu, Yuan‐Yu, Schuff, Norbert, Du, An‐Tao, Mark, Kevin, Zhu, Xiaoping, Hardin, Dawn, Weiner, Michael W.·2002·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether automatic and manual measurements of hippocampal volume differences on MRI between normal aging, cognitive impairment (CI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) yield similar results. Materials and Methods: Reliability was determined for an automatic and a manual method on nine volunteers (22–83 years old) who underwent MRI twice in 1 day. Hippocampal volumes of 20 cognitively normal subjects (mean age 74.0 ± 6.2 years) and age‐matched patients (20 CI and 20 AD) were compared. Results: The intraclass correlation for automatic calculations of hippocampal volume was 0.94; for manual tracing it was 0.99. Volume differences between cognitively normal, CI, and AD subjects from the automatic and manual methods were similar. Conclusion: Because the automatic calculations were faster and less susceptible to rater bias than manual tracing, this automated method is expected to be very useful for analyzing hippocampal changes in studies of aging and dementia. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2002;16:305–310. Published 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.10163

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Hsu, Y., Schuff, N., Du, A., Mark, K., Zhu, X., Hardin, D., & Weiner, M. W.
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08-20
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
305-310
ISSN
  • 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2586
OpenAlex
W2123305958
Cited by
215
References
9
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of automated and manual MRI volumetry of hippocampus in normal aging and dementia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.10163
The paper
Hsu, Y., Schuff, N., Du, A., Mark, K., Zhu, X., Hardin, D., & Weiner, M. W. (2002). Comparison of automated and manual MRI volumetry of hippocampus in normal aging and dementia. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10163

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.