The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessing tumor angiogenesis using macromolecular MR imaging contrast media
Abstract
MRI enhanced with a macromolecular contrast medium (MMCM) has previously been shown to estimate tumor microvascular characteristics that correlate closely with histologic microvascular density, an established surrogate of tumor angiogenesis. A similar MMCM‐enhanced MRI technique has now been used to investigate the acute tumor microvascular effects of antibody‐mediated inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a well‐studied and potent angiogenesis stimulator. Athymic rats xenografted with a human breast carcinoma (MDA‐MB‐435) were imaged after administration of albumin‐gadolinium diethylenetri‐amine pentaacetic acid (Gd‐DTPA 30) using a heavily TI‐weighted three dimensional‐spoiled gradient‐refocused acquisition in a steady‐state pulse sequence before and 24 hours after treatment with anti‐VEGF antibody (single dose of 1 mg). Changes in longitudinal relaxivity (ΔR1) were analyzed using a bidirectional two‐compartment kinetic model to estimate tumor fractional blood volume (fBV) and permeability surface area product (PS). Data showed a significant decrease (P < .05) of tumor PS with respect to macromolecular contrast medium at 24 hours after treatment with anti‐VEGF antibody. No significant change was observed in fBV. Suppression of tumor microvascular permeability induced by anti‐VEGF antibody can be detected and quantified by MMCM‐enhanced MRI. MRI grading of tumor angiogenesis and monitoring of anti‐angiogenesis interventions could find wide clinical application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Weissleder, R., & Mahmood, U. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma19316 · Cited by 1,315
Scaling down imaging: molecular mapping of cancer in mice
Weissleder, R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc701 · Cited by 708
Villaraza, A. J. L., Bumb, A., & Brechbiel, M. W. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900232t · Cited by 632
Reimer, P., & Balzer, T. (2003) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-002-1721-7 · Cited by 614
Jensen, R. L. (2009) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11060-009-9827-2 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Brasch, R., Pham, C., Shames, D., Roberts, T., Van Dijke, K., Van Bruggen, N., Mann, J., Ostrowitzki, S., & Melnyk, O.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-74
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W2033288321
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing tumor angiogenesis using macromolecular MR imaging contrast media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.1880070110
- The paper
- Brasch, R., Pham, C., Shames, D., Roberts, T., Van Dijke, K., Van Bruggen, N., Mann, J., Ostrowitzki, S., & Melnyk, O. (1997). Assessing tumor angiogenesis using macromolecular MR imaging contrast media. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880070110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.