The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol
Open accessAbstract
Temporal stability during an fMRI acquisition is very important because the blood oxygen level‐dependent (BOLD) effects of interest are only a few percent in magnitude. Also, studies involving the collection of groups of subjects over time require stable scanner performance over days, weeks, months, and even years. We describe a protocol designed by one of the authors that has been tested for several years within the context of a large, multicenter collaborative fMRI research project (FIRST‐BIRN). A full description of the phantom, the quality assurance (QA) protocol, and the several calculations used to measure performance is provided. The results obtained with this protocol at multiple sites over time are presented. These data can be used as benchmarks for other centers involved in fMRI research. Some issues with the various protocol measures are highlighted and discussed, and possible protocol improvements are also suggested. Overall, we expect that other fMRI centers will find this approach to QA useful and this report may facilitate developing a similar QA protocol locally. Based on the findings reported herein, the authors are convinced that monitoring QA in this way will improve the quality of fMRI data. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intermediate phenotypes and genetic mechanisms of psychiatric disorders
Meyer-Lindenberg, A., & Weinberger, D. R. (2006) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1993 · Cited by 1,216
Human Connectome Project informatics: Quality control, database services, and data visualization
Marcus, D. S., Harms, M. P., Snyder, A. Z., Jenkinson, M., Wilson, J. A., Glasser, M. F., Barch, D. M., Archie, K. A., Burgess, G. C., Ramaratnam, M., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.077 · Cited by 465
Yan, C.-G., Craddock, R. C., Zuo, X.-N., Zang, Y.-F., & Milham, M. P. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.081 · Cited by 440
Using high-resolution quantitative mapping of R1 as an index of cortical myelination
Lutti, A., Dick, F., Sereno, M. I., & Weiskopf, N. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.005 · Cited by 346
Mapping anterior temporal lobe language areas with fMRI: a multicenter normative study
Binder, J. R., Gross, W. L., Allendorfer, J. B., Bonilha, L., Chapin, J., Edwards, J. C., Grabowski, T. J., Langfitt, J. T., Loring, D. W., Lowe, M. J., et al. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.048 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedman, L., & Glover, G. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-28
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 827-839
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W2034089470
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.20583
- The paper
- Friedman, L., & Glover, G. H. (2006). Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20583
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.