Cited by 465Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsResearch Data Management Practices

Human Connectome Project informatics: Quality control, database services, and data visualization

Open access
Marcus, Daniel S., Harms, Michael P., Snyder, Abraham Z., Jenkinson, Mark, Wilson, J. Anthony, Glasser, Matthew F., Barch, Deanna M., Archie, Kevin A. +16 more·2013·NeuroImage

Abstract

The Human Connectome Project (HCP) has developed protocols, standard operating and quality control procedures, and a suite of informatics tools to enable high throughput data collection, data sharing, automated data processing and analysis, and data mining and visualization. Quality control procedures include methods to maintain data collection consistency over time, to measure head motion, and to establish quantitative modality-specific overall quality assessments. Database services developed as customizations of the XNAT imaging informatics platform support both internal daily operations and open access data sharing. The Connectome Workbench visualization environment enables user interaction with HCP data and is increasingly integrated with the HCP's database services. Here we describe the current state of these procedures and tools and their application in the ongoing HCP study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.077

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurobiologically relevant fluctuations represent only about 4% of total temporal variance in the minimally preprocessed datasets.

    “Neurobiologically relevant fluctuations, which ideally should be the only signals used to drive functional connectivity analyses, represent only a small fraction (~4%) of the total temporal variance in the minimally preprocessed datasets (Glasser et al., 2013b; Marcus et al., 2013).”

    From The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Marcus et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcus, D. S., Harms, M. P., Snyder, A. Z., Jenkinson, M., Wilson, J. A., Glasser, M. F., Barch, D. M., Archie, K. A., Burgess, G. C., Ramaratnam, M., Hodge, M., Horton, W., Herrick, R., Olsen, T., McKay, M., House, M., Hileman, M., Reid, E., Harwell, J., Coalson, T., Schindler, J., Elam, J. S., Curtiss, S. W., & Van Essen, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Marcus, Daniel S.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
80
Pages
202-219
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148519294
Cited by
465
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UniTERAMO Research Catalog (University of Teramo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (1U54MH091657, U54 MH091657, U24 GM104203, R01 EB009352)
  • McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
Human Connectome Project, quality control, data sharing, XNAT, data visualization, neuroimaging informatics, automated data processing, data mining, database services
MeSH terms
Brain, Database Management Systems, Humans, Models, Anatomic, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Quality Control, User-Computer Interface, Databases, Factual, Information Storage and Retrieval, Computational Biology, Data Mining, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review