Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

T1 independent, T2* corrected MRI with accurate spectral modeling for quantification of fat: Validation in a fat‐water‐SPIO phantom

Open access
Hines, Catherine D.G., Yu, Huanzhou, Shimakawa, Ann, McKenzie, Charles A., Brittain, Jean H., Reeder, Scott B.·2009·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Purpose: To validate a T 1‐independent, T 2*‐corrected fat quantification technique that uses accurate spectral modeling of fat using a homogeneous fat‐water‐SPIO phantom over physiologically expected ranges of fat percentage and T 2* decay in the presence of iron overload. Materials and Methods: A homogeneous gel phantom consisting of vials with known fat‐fractions and iron concentrations is described. Fat‐fraction imaging was performed using a multiecho chemical shift‐based fat‐water separation method (IDEAL), and various reconstructions were performed to determine the impact of T 2* correction and accurate spectral modeling. Conventional two‐point Dixon (in‐phase/out‐of‐phase) imaging and MR spectroscopy were performed for comparison with known fat‐fractions. Results: The best agreement with known fat‐fractions over the full range of iron concentrations was found when T 2* correction and accurate spectral modeling were used. Conventional two‐point Dixon imaging grossly underestimated fat‐fraction for all T 2* values, but particularly at higher iron concentrations. Conclusion: This work demonstrates the necessity of T 2* correction and accurate spectral modeling of fat to accurately quantify fat using MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;30:1215–1222. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.21957

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Hines, C. D. G., Yu, H., Shimakawa, A., McKenzie, C. A., Brittain, J. H., & Reeder, S. B.
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-23
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
1215-1222
ISSN
  • 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2586
OpenAlex
W2064245412
Cited by
221
References
2
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: T1 independent, T2* corrected MRI with accurate spectral modeling for quantification of fat: Validation in a fat‐water‐SPIO phantom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.21957
The paper
Hines, C. D. G., Yu, H., Shimakawa, A., McKenzie, C. A., Brittain, J. H., & Reeder, S. B. (2009). T1 independent, T2* corrected MRI with accurate spectral modeling for quantification of fat: Validation in a fat‐water‐SPIO phantom. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21957

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.