Cited by 321Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Quantification of liver fat content with CT and MRI: state of the art

Open access
Starekova, Jitka, Hernando, Diego, Pickhardt, Perry J., Reeder, Scott B.·2021·Radiology

Abstract

Hepatic steatosis is defined as pathologically elevated liver fat content and has many underlying causes. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, with an increasing prevalence among adults and children. Abnormal liver fat accumulation has serious consequences, including cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition, hepatic steatosis is increasingly recognized as an independent risk factor for the metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and, most important, cardiovascular mortality. During the past 2 decades, noninvasive imaging-based methods for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis have been developed and disseminated. Chemical shift-encoded MRI is now established as the most accurate and precise method for liver fat quantification. CT is important for the detection and quantification of incidental steatosis and may play an increasingly prominent role in risk stratification, particularly with the emergence of CT-based screening and artificial intelligence. Quantitative imaging methods are increasingly used for diagnostic work-up and management of steatosis, including treatment monitoring. The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to provide an overview of recent progress and current state of the art for liver fat quantification using CT and MRI, as well as important practical considerations related to clinical implementation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2021204288

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Starekova, J., Hernando, D., Pickhardt, P. J., & Reeder, S. B.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Radiology
Published
2021-11
Volume
301
Issue
2
Pages
250-262
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W3199340922
Cited by
320
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health contsponsor (R01 DK088925, R01 DK100651, R44-EB025729, R01-DK117354)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
hepatic steatosis, liver fat quantification, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, chemical shift MRI, non-invasive imaging, cardiovascular risk, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, artificial intelligence, treatment monitoring
MeSH terms
Fatty Liver, Humans, Liver, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review