Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 401

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Real‐time diffusion‐perfusion mismatch analysis in acute stroke

Open access
Straka, Matus, Albers, Gregory W., Bammer, Roland·2010·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Diffusion‐perfusion mismatch can be used to identify acute stroke patients that could benefit from reperfusion therapies. Early assessment of the mismatch facilitates necessary diagnosis and treatment decisions in acute stroke. We developed the RA pid processing of P erfus I on and D iffusion (RAPID) for unsupervised, fully automated processing of perfusion and diffusion data for the purpose of expedited routine clinical assessment. The RAPID system computes quantitative perfusion maps (cerebral blood volume, CBV; cerebral blood flow, CBF; mean transit time, MTT; and the time until the residue function reaches its peak, Tmax) using deconvolution of tissue and arterial signals. Diffusion‐weighted imaging/perfusion‐weighted imaging (DWI/PWI) mismatch is automatically determined using infarct core segmentation of ADC maps and perfusion deficits segmented from Tmax maps. The performance of RAPID was evaluated on 63 acute stroke cases, in which diffusion and perfusion lesion volumes were outlined by both a human reader and the RAPID system. The correlation of outlined lesion volumes obtained from both methods was r2 = 0.99 for DWI and r2 = 0.96 for PWI. For mismatch identification, RAPID showed 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity. The mismatch information is made available on the hospital's PACS within 5–7 min. Results indicate that the automated system is sufficiently accurate and fast enough to be used for routine care as well as in clinical trials. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:1024–1037. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.22338

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 401

Metadata

Authors
Straka, M., Albers, G. W., & Bammer, R.
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-28
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
1024-1037
ISSN
  • 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2586
OpenAlex
W2086121111
Cited by
401
References
30
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real‐time diffusion‐perfusion mismatch analysis in acute stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.22338
The paper
Straka, M., Albers, G. W., & Bammer, R. (2010). Real‐time diffusion‐perfusion mismatch analysis in acute stroke. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22338

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.