Cited by 68Ultrasound Imaging and ElastographyDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Magnetic resonance elastography of frontotemporal dementia

Open access
Huston, John, Murphy, Matthew C., Boeve, Bradley F., Fattahi, Nikoo, Arani, Arvin, Glaser, Kevin J., Manduca, Armando, Jones, David T. +1 more·2016·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of utilizing brain stiffness as a potential biomarker for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) patients. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a noninvasive technique for evaluating the mechanical properties of brain tissue in vivo. MRE has demonstrated decreased brain stiffness in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Materials and Methods: We examined five male subjects with bvFTD and nine cognitively normal age‐matched male controls (NC) with brain 3T MRE. Stiffness was calculated in nine regions of interest (ROIs): whole brain (entire cerebrum excluding cerebellum), frontal lobes, occipital lobes, parietal lobes, temporal lobes, deep gray matter / white matter (GM/WM; insula, deep gray nuclei and white matter tracts), cerebellum, sensorimotor cortex (pre‐ and postcentral gyri), and a composite region labeled FT (frontal and temporal lobes excluding the pre‐ and postcentral gyri). Results: Significantly lower stiffness values were observed in the whole brain (P = 0.007), frontal lobe (P = 0.001), and temporal lobes (P = 0.005) of bvFTD patients compared to NC. No significant stiffness differences were observed in any other ROIs of bvFTD patients compared to NC (P > 0.05). These results demonstrate that statistically significant brain softening occurs in the frontal and temporal lobes of bvFTD patients, which corresponds to the expected pathophysiology of bvFTD. Conclusion: Future studies evaluating the feasibility of brain MRE for early disease detection and monitoring disease progression could shed new insights into understanding the mechanisms involved in bvFTD. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:474–478.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.24977

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huston, J., Murphy, M. C., Boeve, B. F., Fattahi, N., Arani, A., Glaser, K. J., Manduca, A., Jones, D. T., & Ehman, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Huston, John
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-30
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
474-478
ISSN
  • 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2586
OpenAlex
W1482687773
Cited by
68
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01 EB001981, AG11378)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
magnetic resonance elastography, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, brain stiffness, cerebral softening, biomarkers, frontal lobe, temporal lobe, cerebellum, sensorimotor cortex, deep gray matter, white matter, early disease detection, disease progression monitoring
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain, Brain Mapping, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review